1,473 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Apply test-driven development with small, behavior-focused feedback loops. Use when the user asks to build or fix something test-first, mentions red-green-refactor, or wants integration tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defines where UI components belong in Operately (TurboUI-first). Use when creating, changing, reviewing, or migrating UI components, adding features that need UI, or deciding whether to refactor legacy app UI in app/assets/js/components or app/assets/js/features. Covers pure TurboUI components, component reuse, the app bridge pattern, and legacy migration scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strict quality-first TDD specialist. Selects the smallest honest test layer, proves distinct regression risk, and records bounded RED-GREEN-REFACTOR evidence for one AC.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build modern React Native components using function components and composition. Use when building or refactoring React Native function components and composable UI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write PHP following PSR coding standards, SOLID principles, and code-quality guidelines. Use for PHP style, design, refactoring, naming, and guard clauses—not Composer/PSR-4 project configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write maintainable Python with small functions, explicit boundaries, guard clauses, and readable state flow. Use when refactoring Python services, helpers, modules, or async logic for clarity—not generic test writing, tooling setup, or database transaction implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply core Effective Java patterns for robust, maintainable code. Use when applying SOLID principles, choosing between inheritance and composition, refactoring Java code smells, or reviewing class design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Idiomatic JavaScript patterns and conventions for maintainable existing code. Use when reviewing or refactoring JavaScript language patterns; defer project scaffolding, dependency setup, and tool configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standardizes the creation and evaluation of high-density Agent Skills (Claude, Cursor, Windsurf). Ensures skills achieve high Activation (specificity/completeness) and Implementation (conciseness/actionability) scores. Use when: writing or auditing SKILL.md, improving trigger accuracy, or refactoring skills to reduce redundancy and maximize token ROI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standardizes visual audits, responsive design, and behavioral testing for web apps. Use to verify a web UI fix or cross-browser behavior; defer backend API refactors, Playwright installation/tooling setup, and Appium/mobile automation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides quality-first TDD for new behavior, bug fixes, and test changes. Selects the smallest test layer, proves a distinct regression risk, and runs bounded RED-GREEN-REFACTOR verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce SOLID principles, guard-clause style, function size limits, and intention-revealing naming across all languages. Use when refactoring for readability, applying clean-code patterns, reviewing naming conventions, or reducing function complexity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Elixir/Phoenix technical debt — duplicates, refactoring; Use when asked about code quality, cleanup, or what…
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Narrow bare rescue in Elixir so real errors like KeyError and typos; Use to audit rescues and refactor error handling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Elixir/Phoenix technical debt — duplicates, refactoring opportunities, credo issues. Use when asked about code quality, cleanup, or what to improve.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Elixir/Phoenix technical debt — duplicates, refactoring opportunities, credo issues. Use when asked about code quality, cleanup, or what to improve.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scope or freeze which files Claude can edit during debugging, a refactor, or review. Use when edits should stay in specific dirs, or for a read-only investigate lock. Backed by a sentinel + PreToolUse hook.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route ambiguous or mixed Phoenix/LiveView/Ecto requests before choosing a workflow. Use when user is unsure where to start/how to approach work, asks for the right workflow, or combines intents such as fixing and refactoring. NOT for a clear task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Narrow bare rescue in Elixir so real errors like KeyError and typos propagate instead of being swallowed. Use to audit rescues and refactor error handling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stress-tests a fuzzy or vague feature idea before any PRD, spec, or ticket is written. TRIGGER when: the user has a fuzzy feature idea — one or two paragraphs, vague on users / scope / success — and wants to harden it, or says "grill / stress-test / pressure-test this idea." DO NOT TRIGGER when: the idea is already turned into a spec or PRD; bug fixes or refactors; the idea is hardened and you are ready to write the PRD → creating-prd.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test-driven development workflow with philosophy guide - plan → write tests → implement → validate
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。