「research」の検索結果

Project-first Research pipeline with live gates, source/PDF evidence, claim boundaries, compute and publication controls; includes an optional PubMed/arXiv standard-library helper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds DRAFT user personas from the research notes, interview summaries, survey free text and support themes the user provides: for each persona the goals, pains, jobs to be done, context of use, quotes exactly as supplied with their participant codes, and the evidence count behind every attribute, with names, demographics and any detail no participant stated left UNKNOWN rather than invented. Use when the user asks to "build personas from these interviews", "who are our users based on this research", "draft user personas", "turn these research notes into personas" or "update our personas with the new interviews". Do not use for theming a batch of customer feedback into counts, use customer-feedback-theme-synthesis instead; for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis; for the requirements those personas imply, use product-requirements-draft. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collective research memory for AI coding agents — search prior research before hitting the web, save findings back to the shared cache, view karma stats. Use when the user asks a library/API/framework question, before running WebSearch/WebFetch, or after deep web research so the next agent doesn't repay the cost. Talks directly to the hosted MCP endpoint via JSON-RPC — no local MCP server required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cursorで研究テーマを必要な資料収集・集約・分析・仮説形成へ進める。Web/ローカル資料は問いに必要な場合だけ調べ、確認事実と推測を分ける。ユーザーが /research と入力したときに使う。

研究テーマを、必要な資料収集・集約・分析・仮説形成へ進める親向けスキル。Webやローカル資料は問いに必要な場合だけ調べ、確認事実と推測を分ける。実装・バグ修正・デバッグは対象外で、ユーザーが /research と入力したときに使う。

Researches Reddit using a brand's Brand DNA to find promotable pain-point discussions, target subreddits, and real user search language. Produces a prioritized Reddit opportunity list for content seeding, helpful replies, and prompt research inspiration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Investigator OPSEC — threat-model who might notice you, control your attribution surface across IP, ASN, browser and TLS fingerprint, timing and logged-in accounts, separate research identity from… Use when setting up a research account, avoiding tipping off a subject, worrying about LinkedIn profile-view leakage, needing a burner phone or email, or hardening a research VM or browser profile

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fan one deep-research prompt out to several external LLMs at once through a logged-in browser, then collect the reports, archive the originals and synthesize a consensus. Use at the final stage of a research protocol, instead of hand-pasting one prompt into N sites. Triggers: "/dr-fanout", "fan out the DR", "distribute the research prompt".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for strategic work: recall the knowledge vault, run a gap analysis, emit a deep-research prompt for external tools, then synthesize the returned reports into a decision memo. Use before any new product, feature, market, pricing, GTM or architecture call, where local recall alone is not enough. Triggers: "/alfa-search-recall-deepresearch", "alpha protocol", "R+DR".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform quick web searches, local business lookups, and URL content extraction. Covers web_search for general queries, brave_local_search for location-based discovery, and run_crawl4ai_job for deep page crawling. Use when fact-checking, trend spotting, doing competitor analysis, looking up local businesses, extracting page content, or performing content research that doesn't need multi-step deep research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown files. For creating comparison/alternative pages from profiles, see competitors. For sales-specific battle cards, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep, iterative internet research for current facts, source triangulation, contradiction checks, due diligence, competitive analysis, claim verification, "latest" lookups, and cited reports. Use when the user asks to browse, search, research the web, verify claims, compare sources, gather primary sources, investigate companies, people, products, technical topics, news, events, markets, or create AKBP-ready durable research evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Tavily's multi-source research workflow for comparisons, market analysis, literature-oriented exploration, or detailed cited reports. Use only when bounded search and extraction are insufficient.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research with structured reports and charts. ONLY use when the user explicitly requests research/analysis, or needs data visualization with charts, or quantitative/comparative analysis across multiple sources. Do NOT use for simple questions or quick lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This is the core skill for the deep research and writing tool—combining AI-driven deep research with well-formatted written outputs. Every document produced is backed by comprehensive literature search and verified citations through the research-lookup skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and analyze Reddit discussions for market research, product feedback, and community insights using Xpoz. Use when asked to "search Reddit", "what does Reddit think about X", "Reddit feedback on X", "subreddit analysis", or "Reddit market research".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to analyze competitors' App Store strategy, find keyword gaps, or understand competitive positioning. Also use when the user mentions "competitor analysis", "competitive research", "keyword gap", "what are my competitors doing", or "compare my app to". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Access research-grade sensor data using SensorKit. Use when reading ambient light levels, accelerometer data, rotation rates, device usage patterns, keyboard metrics, or media events for approved research studies. Requires SensorKit entitlement and research study authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

research step of mspec workflow — investigate via subagent and produce research.md

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add GitHub permalinks with fixed SHA/commit references to research documentation containing code snippets. Use when writing technical docs with code examples, creating investigation/research docs that reference source files, user asks to "add permalinks" or "add GitHub links", documenting code research findings with file:line references, or creating audit trails needing permanent code references. Triggers on "add github links", "add permalinks", "link to source", "make code references permanent".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate model specifications, requirements, and evaluation strategy. Use when researching a model before benchmarking: reading HuggingFace model cards, estimating VRAM requirements, selecting GPU providers, and determining evaluation approach. Triggers on "model research", "investigate model", "model info", "VRAM estimate", "which provider", "model card".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legal precedent App-in-Skill (Busabase-backed) desk for internal casebase search, local court-pattern analysis, similar-case packs, citations, and approval-gated research exports. Use when the user invokes $kelly-legal-precedent-desk, mentions 类案检索, 本地裁判尺度, 内部案例库查询, 案例查阅与收藏, precedent research, similar cases, legal research pack, or wants a Busabase-backed desk where lawyers review agent-prepared precedent findings before reuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。