「systematic」の検索結果

Use this skill when conducting a self-audit of your DQF library before an FMCSA compliance review. Covers the systematic approach to verifying all 12 documents are current, complete, and properly maintained.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and consolidate reusable components, design tokens, and patterns into your design system. Identifies opportunities for systematic reuse and enriches your component library. Use when the user asks to create components, refactor repeated UI patterns, build a design system, or extract tokens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user requests to create or customize an academic personal website from a GitHub template repository. This skill handles the complete workflow of forking academic template repositories (like academicpages.github.io), extracting structured personal information from memory or provided data, and systematically updating configuration files (_config.yml), navigation menus (_data/navigation.yml), content pages (_pages/about.md), and publication listings (_publications/). It specifically handles academic profiles including personal details, education background, research experience, publications, skills, and contact information. Triggers include requests to 'fork and customize academic homepage', 'build personal academic website', 'create research portfolio', or 'set up GitHub pages with academic template'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user requests information about academic benchmarks, datasets, or research papers, particularly in machine learning, deep learning, or logical reasoning domains. This skill enables systematic research of academic benchmarks by searching web sources, downloading and analyzing arXiv papers, extracting key metadata (number of tasks, training availability, difficulty levels), and compiling comparative summaries. It triggers on requests involving dataset comparisons, benchmark analysis, or academic paper research for table creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Abductive analysis for qualitative interview data following Timmermans & Tavory. Guides you through theory-first analysis that recognizes anomalies and generates novel theoretical insights through systematic puzzle exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5W1H Decision Framework Tool. Use for: (1) Systematic decision-making before creating todos, (2) Preventing duplicate implementation, (3) Detecting avoidance behavior, (4) Ensuring agile refactor compliance with executor/dispatcher separation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically finds and fixes bugs using proven debugging techniques. Traces from symptoms to root cause, implements fixes, and prevents regression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build complex AI systems with declarative programming, optimize prompts automatically, create modular RAG systems and agents with DSPy - Stanford NLP's framework for systematic LM programming

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill instead of WebSearch for ANY question requiring web research. Trigger on queries like "what is X", "explain X", "compare X and Y", "research X", or before content generation tasks. Provides systematic multi-angle research methodology instead of single superficial searches. Use this proactively when the user's question needs online information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior. 4-phase root cause investigation — NO fixes without understanding the problem first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic exploratory QA testing of web applications — find bugs, capture evidence, and generate structured reports

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply systematic performance optimization techniques when writing or reviewing code. Use when optimizing hot paths, reducing latency, improving throughput, fixing performance regressions, or when the user mentions performance, optimization, speed, latency, throughput, profiling, or benchmarking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and improve humor using systems thinking. Use when jokes fall flat, when humor feels forced, when punchlines don't land, or when you want to systematically enhance comedic writing. Treats jokes as engineerable connection systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically evaluate architecture decisions, document trade-offs, and select appropriate patterns. This skill should be used when the user asks about 'architecture decision', 'ADR', 'design pattern selection', 'technology choice', or needs to evaluate architectural trade-offs. Keywords: architecture, ADR, patterns, trade-offs, technical debt, quality attributes, decision record.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic performance profiling and optimization methodology. Covers CPU profiling, memory profiling, heap analysis, goroutine/thread analysis, FlameGraph generation, latency profiling, database query profiling, network I/O profiling, and continuous performance regression detection. USE WHEN: investigating performance issues, optimizing slow code, reducing memory usage, diagnosing GC/CPU bottlenecks, finding N+1 queries, analyzing pprof/flamegraph output, or establishing a performance baseline. Triggers on "profiling", "performance analysis", "slow code", "flame graph", "pprof", "heap dump", "memory leak", "CPU spike", "bottleneck".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Breaks down trading ideas into component parts for systematic Pine Script implementation. Use when analyzing trading concepts, decomposing strategies, planning indicator features, or extracting ideas from YouTube videos. Triggers on conceptual questions, "how would I build", YouTube URLs, or video analysis requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic Power BI performance troubleshooting prompt for identifying, diagnosing, and resolving performance issues in Power BI models, reports, and queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This workflow guides you through a systematic approach to identify missing features, prioritize them, and create detailed specifications for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically audit and remediate accessibility issues in UI, focusing on keyboard navigation, screen reader support, color contrast, semantic HTML, ARIA usage, and motion sensitivity. Use when the user wants to improve accessibility, make a component accessible, fix WCAG violations, add keyboard support, or ensure screen reader compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Extended thinking: This workflow implements a sophisticated debugging and resolution pipeline that leverages AI-assisted debugging tools and observability platforms to systematically diagnose and resolve production issues. The intelligent debugging strategy combines automated root cause analysis with human expertise, using modern 2024/2025 practices including AI code assistants (GitHub Copilot, Claude Code), observability platforms (Sentry, DataDog, OpenTelemetry), git bisect automation for ...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。