2,321 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits AI-assisted legal, compliance, governance, and institutional decisions before reliance to determine whether the responsible human or institution has enough access to the evidence, reasoning basis, uncertainty, authority, and review path to genuinely own the decision rather than merely approve, sign, or transmit it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
U.S. customs and trade-law research assistant for HTS classification, CROSS ruling research, CIT/CAFC decision briefing, duty compilation (General + Special + Chapter 99 + AD/CVD + MPF/HMF), country of origin determination, FTA qualification, and end-to-end import compliance review. Triggers on product classification, tariff questions, customs rulings, trade remedy screening (Section 301/232/201), Partner Government Agency admissibility, and UFLPA forced-labor analysis. Produces attorney-reviewable draft work product with an enforced HTSUS authority hierarchy and explicit evidence ledger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyses contracts for risk across five critical clauses (Limitation of Liability, Indemnities, IP Ownership, Data Protection, Termination). Built for founders with no legal background. Flags red flags, explains risks in plain language, and provides negotiation guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When your bar comes asking "show me how you billed AI-assisted work" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude Code session logs, it drafts reviewable time entries plus a printable HTML audit packet with: SHA-256 chain of evidence (source files + matter.yml + active disclosure pack + verifiable artifact self-hash), attorney identity and signature block, a bar-opinion disclosure pack with starter language for five jurisdictions, and content-aware deterministic narratives derived from filename and tool shape — never from prompt text by default. The tool refuses to bill on its own. --strict mode refuses to ship the artifact if any audit invariant fails (broad routes, missing attorney, missing/unverified disclosure). Comes as a Node CLI and a self-contained browser version (no backend; JSONL never leaves the page). 15 invariant tests verify the contract. AGPL-3.0.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map the epistemic structure of a subject to determine knowledge types and inform curriculum sequencing. Use when designing courses, restructuring programmes, or analysing knowledge architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measure and shrink the always-loaded context of a Claude Code harness (CLAUDE.md + rules without paths frontmatter) back under budget — migrate narrative to reference files, convert rules to path-scoped or skill-triggered loading, and verify zero governance loss with deterministic preservation checks. Use on "harness diet", "context diet", "rules diet", "CLAUDE.md too long", "always-load budget", "trim my rules", "context bloat", "하네스 다이어트", "룰 다이어트", "컨텍스트 다이어트", "always-load 줄여줘". Not for one-off prose editing or project docs cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Count Korean text deterministically with exact grapheme, line, and byte contracts for self-intros and form limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate Temps through the pinned `@temps-sdk/cli` package with bunx or npx. Use when the user mentions Temps CLI, `@temps-sdk/cli`, a CLI command, or asks to deploy, configure, inspect, automate, or administer Temps from a terminal. Covers contexts, projects, deployments, environments, services, domains, monitoring, backups, telemetry, browser Performance Insights/Core Web Vitals, Cloud, platform administration, and read-only managed-data browsing. Apply the target-context, secret-handling, confirmation, and verification rules for every agentic CLI operation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investment Committee memo drafting for China-focused PE/IB deals. Adapted from the original ic-memo skill for Chinese market context, terminology, and decision frameworks. Triggers on "A股投委会", "IC Memo", "investment memo China", "投委会材料", "IC memo A-share", or "committee memo [company]".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create one-page company profile slides (strip profiles) for A-share targets in pitch books and deal materials. Adapted from the original strip-profile skill for Chinese companies, A-share market data, and Chinese business terminology. Triggers on "A股公司简介", "公司概况", "strip profile China", "one-pager A-share", or "target profile for [company]".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write variance commentary for A-share financial results. Adapts the original variance-commentary skill for Chinese financial statements, CAS conventions, and Chinese business terminology. Triggers on "A股业绩点评", "财报点评", "variance commentary China", "业绩分析", "variances [company]", or "commentary on [company] results".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive A-share sector and industry landscape reports — market size, competitive positioning, policy environment, key A-share players, trading multiples, and thematic trends. Adapted from the original sector-overview skill for Chinese market structure and terminology. Triggers on "A股行业分析", "行业研究", "板块分析", "sector overview China", "A-share sector deep dive", "白酒/半导体/新能源 行业分析", or "[industry] landscape China".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate text, images, video, and audio, and make typed decisions from the terminal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performance specialist for full audits. Measures CWV (LCP/INP/CLS), Lighthouse score signals, and emits deterministic report artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce complexity and size limits on Swift code with SwiftLint threshold rules — cyclomatic complexity, function/type/file length, parameter count — adopted via a violations baseline so existing code never blocks. Use when agent-written code needs deterministic size constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gate test coverage with a ratchet — a committed baseline that coverage may never drop below and only ever rises. Ships a coverage-gate script (xccov-based) plus an advisory CRAP report (complexity × uncovered). Use when agent-written code needs a deterministic "tests were actually written" check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write architecture fitness functions — deterministic tests that enforce a project's hard rules (module boundaries, offline guarantees, content contracts) from inside its own test target. Use when a constraint lives only in prose (CLAUDE.md, code review) and should become un-arguable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates state preservation and restoration infrastructure for navigation paths, tab selection, scroll positions, and form data across app launches and background termination. Use when user wants to save/restore app state, remember where the user left off, or persist UI state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TDD and testing skills for iOS/macOS apps. Covers characterization tests, TDD workflows, test contracts, snapshot tests, test infrastructure, and deterministic quality gates (fitness functions, coverage ratchet, mutation testing). Use for test-driven development, adding tests to existing code, or building test infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。