「uat」の検索結果

Specialized business strategy prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output formats) for consulting, M&A, corporate strategy, and strategic planning tasks. Use when building prompts for deal evaluation, due diligence, portfolio strategy, business model analysis, board narratives, investment cases, market entry plans, or strategic options assessments. Trigger on: "build a prompt for M&A analysis," "due diligence prompt," "board narrative," "investment case," "market entry strategy," "strategic options," "portfolio strategy prompt," "business model analysis prompt," "consulting-style analysis." Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or for auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces structured markdown session continuation documents for multi-session workflows. Captures active work streams, decisions with rationale, knowledge-file deltas learned during the session, the exact files to load next conversation, ingested content, artifacts, and open items into an ingestion-optimized handoff. Carries pending KF updates and unresolved items forward across handoff chains so context never drops. Generates a closeout checklist and echoes the starter prompt to chat. Use when approaching context limits, wrapping up a session, or managing work across conversations. Trigger on: "create a handoff," "session closeout," "wrap up this session," "build session handoff," "BSH," "continue next session," "we're running out of context," "context is getting long." Do NOT use for Memory optimization, context budget analysis, project audits, deciding whether work is ready for autonomous/Claude Code execution (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check), or summaries with no continuation intent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Web runtime package: uses memory in this order: connector-backed, project-pack, none. Never assumes subprocess access or unrestricted local files. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles. Also use when the user wants to improve a system prompt, a data pipeline, a writing style, or any artifact where quality can be decomposed into measurable tracks. For inference optimisation tasks (model latency, throughput, quantization, GPU deployment), a* delegates the low-level tuning to AITune while maintaining quality tracking and learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review web design for layout quality, typography, colour usage, spacing, responsive behaviour, brand consistency, and visual hierarchy. Covers design principles evaluation and improvement recommendations. Use when reviewing a design mockup before development, assessing an implemented site for design quality, providing feedback during a design review session, evaluating brand consistency, or checking responsive behaviour across breakpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a peer review of research methodology, experimental design, and manuscript quality. Covers methodology evaluation, statistical appropriateness, reproducibility assessment, bias identification, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing a manuscript, preprint, or internal research report, evaluating a research proposal or study protocol, assessing evidence quality behind a claim, or reviewing a thesis chapter or dissertation section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize, track, and value a trading card game collection. Covers inventory methods, storage best practices, grade-based valuation, want-list management, and collection analytics for Pokemon, MTG, Flesh and Blood, and Kayou cards. Use when starting a new collection and setting up inventory tracking, cataloging an existing collection that has grown beyond casual knowledge, valuing a collection for insurance or sale, or deciding which cards to submit for professional grading based on value potential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grade a trading card using PSA, BGS, or CGC standards. Covers observation-first assessment (adapted from meditate's unbiased observation), centering measurement, surface analysis, edge and corner evaluation, and final grade assignment with confidence interval. Supports Pokemon, MTG, Flesh and Blood, and Kayou cards. Use when evaluating a card before professional grading submission, pre-screening a collection for high-grade candidates, settling condition disputes between buyers and sellers, or estimating the grade-dependent value spread for a card.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and compare levitation mechanisms for a given application through a structured trade study. Covers magnetic (passive diamagnetic, active feedback, superconducting), acoustic (standing wave, phased array), aerodynamic (hovercraft, air bearings, Coanda effect), and electrostatic (Coulomb suspension, ion traps) mechanisms. Use when selecting the most appropriate levitation approach for transport, sample handling, display, bearings, or precision measurement applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and simplify Boolean expressions using truth tables, algebraic laws (De Morgan, distributive, absorption, idempotent, consensus), and Karnaugh maps for up to six variables. Use when you need to reduce a Boolean expression to its minimal sum-of-products or product-of-sums form, verify logical equivalence between two expressions, or prepare a minimized function for gate-level implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI context assessment — evaluating problem malleability, mapping structural rigidity versus flexibility, analyzing transformation pressure, and estimating capacity to adapt. Use when a complex task feels stuck and it is unclear whether to push through or pivot, before a significant approach change to assess whether the current reasoning structure can support it, when accumulated workarounds suggest the underlying approach may be wrong, or as a periodic structural health check during extended multi-step tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze the dynamics of diffusion processes using stochastic differential equations, Fokker-Planck equations, first-passage time distributions, and parameter sensitivity analysis. Use when deriving probability density evolution for a continuous-time diffusion process, computing mean first-passage times for bounded diffusion, analyzing how drift and diffusion parameters affect process behavior, or validating closed-form solutions against stochastic simulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze pre-trained generative diffusion models (Stable Diffusion, DALL-E, Flux) by computing quality metrics (FID, IS, CLIP score, precision/recall), inspecting noise schedules, extracting and visualizing attention maps, and probing latent spaces. Use when evaluating a pre-trained generative diffusion model's output quality, comparing noise schedule variants, analyzing cross-attention patterns for text-conditioned generation, interpolating between latent codes, or detecting out-of-distribution inputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appraise gemstone value using the four Cs (color, clarity, cut, carat), origin assessment, treatment detection, and market factor analysis. Advisory educational guidance only — not a certified appraisal. Use when understanding factors that determine a gemstone's value, pre-screening stones before a professional appraisal, evaluating whether a seller's asking price is reasonable, learning gemstone grading methodology, or understanding how treatment status affects value.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive primary skill for agents working with Weights & Biases. Covers both the W&B SDK (training runs, metrics, artifacts, sweeps) and the Weave SDK (GenAI traces, evaluations, scorers). Includes helper libraries, gotcha tables, and data analysis patterns. Use this skill whenever the user asks about W&B runs, Weave traces, evaluations, training metrics, loss curves, model comparisons, or any Weights & Biases data — even if they don't say "W&B" explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive US stock analysis including fundamental analysis (financial metrics, business quality, valuation), technical analysis (indicators, chart patterns, support/resistance), stock comparisons, and investment report generation. Use when user requests analysis of US stock tickers (e.g., "analyze AAPL", "compare TSLA vs NVDA", "give me a report on Microsoft"), evaluation of financial metrics, technical chart analysis, or investment recommendations for American stocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates market bubble risk through quantitative data-driven analysis using the revised Minsky/Kindleberger framework v2.1. Prioritizes objective metrics (Put/Call, VIX, margin debt, breadth, IPO data) over subjective impressions. Features strict qualitative adjustment criteria with confirmation bias prevention. Supports practical investment decisions with mandatory data collection and mechanical scoring. Use when user asks about bubble risk, valuation concerns, or profit-taking timing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build evaluation frameworks for agent systems. Use when testing agent performance, validating context engineering choices, or measuring improvements over time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score a PhD applicant's profile and rank candidate advisors using a connection-first 4.0-scale scoring system. Best-supported for physics / HEP and materials science (MSE), with the scoring engine extensible to chemistry, biology, CS, math, EE, ChemE, earth science (each with field-specific caveats — see references/journal_tiers.md). Use when the user wants to evaluate their PhD application chances, find matching advisors at top US programs, score a CV for graduate school, or compare candidate professors. Also triggers when the user mentions phdtaketaketake or its connection-first philosophy of valuing advisor network over h-index.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fundamental Analysis skill — valuation ratios, growth metrics, profitability, balance sheet health, competitive moat analysis, and management quality. Returns Fundamental Score (0-100). Triggered by "trade fundamental <TICKER>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep Single-Candidate Scoring — evaluate one candidate across 5 dimensions (skills match, experience relevance, culture fit signals, growth potential, red flags) with final 0-100 score and hire/no-hire signal

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for rafter. Invoke when a sub-skill is unclear, or when the task needs `rafter run` (remote SAST+SCA), `rafter secrets` (local secrets-only), `rafter audit`, policy checks, or command-risk evaluation. Scope by security surface, not task label: engage when the diff touches auth, credentials/secrets/tokens, untrusted input, SQL, shell/exec, file paths, deserialization, crypto, network endpoints, data deletion, or dependencies; for research/experimental/local-only code with none of that, a quick surface check is enough. When such surface IS present and no rafter skill or CLI call has been made, invoke this before handing the task off — an un-evaluated "done" on genuine security surface is not done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when evaluating VCSDD grading dimensions during adversarial review. Provides concrete evaluation checklists for each of the 5 dimensions and convergence signal detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform critical Rust code reviews covering correctness, edition 2024 compliance, error handling, API design, async pitfalls, and dependency hygiene. ALWAYS use this skill when the user wants to review, audit, or critically evaluate Rust code — whether that's a PR diff, a specific crate or module, a cross-cutting concern like error handling, or the whole codebase. This includes requests to "review my changes", "check this code", "audit for best practices", "look for issues", "what's wrong with this", or "flag anything that could bite us". Use it even when the user doesn't say "review" explicitly but is asking you to find problems, inconsistencies, or anti-patterns in existing Rust code. Do NOT use for requests to write, fix, refactor, test, explain, or implement code — only for evaluating existing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。