「validate」の検索結果

Build a blog-level strategy for a niche or business: audience segments, 3-5 content pillars with hub-and-spoke clusters, competitive gaps, measurement plan, and a 90-day roadmap. Use when the user says "blog strategy", "content strategy", "blog positioning", "content pillars", "what should I blog about". Not for a dated publishing schedule (blog-calendar), SERP-validated cluster maps (blog-cluster), or a brief or outline for one post (blog-brief, blog-outline). Makes no promise of rankings or AI citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite and optimize existing blog posts for Google SEO (May 2026 Core Update, March 2026 core/spam context, June 2026 spam context, E-E-A-T) and AI citation visibility as one SEO discipline. Full rewrite for both Google rankings AND AI citations. For AI-citation-only audit (no Google work), use blog-geo instead. Replaces fabricated statistics with sourced data, applies answer-first formatting, adds Pixabay/Unsplash images, generates built-in SVG charts, validates Article-priority schema, performs AI content detection, adds citation capsules and information gain markers, and updates freshness signals. Works with any blog format (MDX, markdown, HTML). Use when user says "rewrite blog", "optimize blog", "update blog", "improve blog", "fix blog", "refresh blog post", "blog optimization".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing WordPress plugins for GPL compliance, checking license headers or compatibility, evaluating upsell/freemium/trialware patterns, validating plugin naming or trademark rules, checking plugin slugs, running Plugin Check (PCP) to validate plugin changes, interpreting its findings, understanding why a plugin was rejected from WordPress.org, or answering questions about the 18 WordPress.org Plugin Directory guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through creating, updating, debugging, and validating Agent Skills for AI agents. Use when the user wants to create, write, author, design, troubleshoot, validate, or improve a Skill, or needs help with SKILL.md, frontmatter, or skill structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or reviewing tests for DeepSeek Harness plugins, external DSH plugin packages, or package changes in the deepseek-harness repository. Select the minimum sufficient levels from unit tests, coverage, real-API end-to-end tests, snapshots, Web tests, real compositions, and built-artifact smoke tests. For Harness version migrations, use this Skill's built-in seven-touchpoint test workflow and validate the exact target-version runtime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On-demand provisioning guide for a Memmy GUI task that fully connects an explicitly named local Agent: discover its active history store, install or remove its rendered Memmy Skill, bootstrap a scan boundary, persist a validated automatic-sync recipe, and verify GUI-visible readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, inspect, edit, validate, render, and deliver PowerPoint presentations and templates while preserving OOXML structure and user metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, inspect, edit, recalculate, validate, render, and deliver Excel workbooks while preserving formulas, formatting, drawings, links, macros, and metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds out whether a problem is real and a solution would work, before building it — recruiting the right people, interviewing without leading them, separating what users say from what they do, naming the riskiest assumption and testing that one first, and reaching a decision rather than a summary. Use this to validate a problem, test an idea cheaply, decide whether to build something, or fix a discovery process that keeps confirming what the team already believed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates a software or startup idea against problem, market, competition, monetization, defensibility, and execution, and returns a verdict rather than encouragement. Use this when an idea needs pressure-testing before anyone builds, when deciding whether something is worth pursuing, when assessing competition or willingness to pay, or when a validated idea needs a first-customers and MVP plan. Default to scrutiny; the useful answer is usually the unwelcome one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans under genuine uncertainty — building scenarios, identifying which assumptions are load-bearing, setting early-warning indicators, and stress-testing a plan against futures rather than forecasting one. Use this when a decision depends on something unknowable, when a plan assumes conditions that may not hold, before a large irreversible commitment, or when a market, regulatory, or technology shift could invalidate the strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve merge conflicts non-interactively, validate build and tests, and finalize conflict resolution

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts LabArchives notebook data, entry metadata, and authorized ELN exports into manuscript-ready academic writing outputs such as Methods sections, data-availability statements, reproducibility appendices, experiment timelines, and submission support notes. Optional bundled scripts can be used to collect or validate source notebook data before writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work. 2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported as.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extends a mechanistic or association-level biomedical finding into a staged validation pathway that moves from descriptive evidence toward stronger functional support, mechanistic specificity, and clinical relevance. Use this skill when a user has a pathway, biomarker, cell-state, target, mechanism, or association finding and needs to decide what should be validated next, in what order, and which evidence layers are necessary versus optional. Do not default to maximal validation stacks. Build a structured validation ladder with a primary route, stronger upgrade route, and optional extensions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans the biomarker landscape of a disease area by biomarker type, clinical/research use case, evidence layer, validation status, and maturity level. Use this skill when a user wants a field-level biomarker evidence map rather than a generic literature summary. Always separate exploratory biomarkers from externally validated or clinically embedded biomarkers, and never imply clinical maturity without explicit evidence support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organizes the evidence and competitive landscape around a drug, target, or pathway by separating disease relevance, tractability, preclinical evidence, clinical evidence, modality fit, and crowding. Always map what is biologically supported, what is druggable, what has actually advanced, and what remains strategically open. Never confuse target relevance with druggability, preclinical activity with clinical promise, or narrative excitement with validated development maturity. Never fabricate references, trial status, approval status, company activity, or asset metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need a standardized R CLI workflow to run two-class SVM-RFE feature ranking on an expression-like matrix, choose an informative feature count from cross-validated error, and generate reproducible ranking and error plots. NOT for regression, multi-class classification, missing-value imputation, or remote data fetching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses whether study results are trustworthy by auditing design integrity, sample structure, statistical handling, bias control, validation chain, and claim discipline. It identifies where results are robust, fragile, overfit, under-validated, or overclaimed. Always separate reported findings from reliability judgment. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, trial identifiers, study features, or validation claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running controlled perf experiments to validate hypotheses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare and run XQUIC local compilation. Use when asked to compile, build, configure, or diagnose the local build environment for XQUIC, especially across macOS/Linux. Detect intent and platform, then delegate actual compilation to scripts/validate.sh instead of hand-writing CMake commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format, create, and update concise XQUIC pull request bodies and review-state transitions. Use when asked to prepare or edit an alibaba/xquic PR body, create a draft PR from an already-pushed branch, update a PR after code changes pushed a new head, or move a validated draft toward review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to migrate identified PostgreSQL tables to Timescale/TimescaleDB hypertables with optimal configuration and validation. **Trigger when user asks to:** - Migrate or convert PostgreSQL tables to hypertables - Execute hypertable migration with minimal downtime - Plan blue-green migration for large tables - Validate hypertable migration success - Configure compression after migration **Prerequisites:** Tables already identified as candidates (use find-hypertable-candidates first if needed) **Keywords:** migrate to hypertable, convert table, Timescale, TimescaleDB, blue-green migration, in-place conversion, create_hypertable, migration validation, compression setup Step-by-step migration planning including: partition column selection, chunk interval calculation, PK/constraint handling, migration execution (in-place vs blue-green), and performance validation queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。