2,544 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create Pydantic models following the multi-model pattern with Base, Create, Update, Response, and InDB variants. Use when defining API request/response schemas, database models, or data validation in Python applications using Pydantic v2.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enumerates chemical libraries through reaction SMARTS transformations using RDKit. Generates virtual compound libraries from building blocks using defined chemical reactions with product validation. Use when creating combinatorial libraries or enumerating products from synthetic routes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive cell type annotation for IMC data. Covers napari-based annotation, marker-guided labeling, training data generation, and annotation validation. Use when manually annotating cell types for training classifiers or validating automated phenotyping results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Targeted metabolomics analysis using MRM/SRM with standard curves. Covers absolute quantification, method validation, and quality assessment. Use when quantifying specific metabolites using calibration curves and internal standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end binder design using BindCraft hallucination. Use this skill when: (1) Designing protein binders with built-in AF2 validation, (2) Running production-quality binder campaigns, (3) Using different design protocols (fast, default, slow), (4) Need joint backbone and sequence optimization, (5) Want high experimental success rate. For backbone-only generation, use rfdiffusion. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc. For tool selection guidance, use binder-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidance for SPR and BLI binding characterization experiments. Use when: (1) Planning binding kinetics experiments, (2) Troubleshooting poor/no binding signal, (3) Interpreting kinetic data artifacts, (4) Choosing between SPR vs BLI platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify likely causal variants within GWAS loci using SuSiE for sum of single effects regression and FINEMAP for shotgun stochastic search. Computes posterior inclusion probabilities and credible sets to prioritize variants for functional follow-up. Use when narrowing GWAS association signals to candidate causal variants or building credible sets for functional validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guidance for systematic backtesting of trading strategies. Use when developing, testing, stress-testing, or validating quantitative trading strategies. Covers "beating ideas to death" methodology, parameter robustness testing, slippage modeling, bias prevention, and interpreting backtest results. Applicable when user asks about backtesting, strategy validation, robustness testing, avoiding overfitting, or systematic trading development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert abstract edge concepts into strategy draft variants and optional exportable ticket YAMLs for edge-candidate-agent export/validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect IBD-style Distribution Days for QQQ/SPY (close down at least 0.2% on higher volume), track 25-session expiration and 5% invalidation, count d5/d15/d25 clusters, classify market risk (NORMAL/CAUTION/HIGH/SEVERE), and emit TQQQ/QQQ exposure recommendations. Use after market close, before TQQQ exposure changes, or as input to FTD/market-state frameworks. Does not execute trades.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculate contract-based futures position sizes from a direction, entry, and stop-loss, using verified per-symbol contract specs (multiplier, tick size, tick value). Use when the user asks how many futures contracts to trade, wants to size a futures position (ES, NQ, ZB, GC, CL, 6E/E6, VX, BT, ...), or is handing off a contrarian-setup-gate READY_FOR_PLAN direction/invalidation_level for sizing. Pure, offline calculation -- no API keys, no network.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize the three Jason Shapiro contrarian-pipeline verdicts (COT crowding, news-reaction failure, weekly price-action confirmation) into one actionable setup_status via a fail-closed precedence state machine. Pure, offline synthesis -- no network, no API keys, no computation beyond validation and precedence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Abstract detector tickets and hints into reusable edge concepts with thesis, invalidation signals, and strategy playbooks before strategy design/export.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides installation of gitagent and creation of first agent with scaffolding, configuration, and validation. Use when the user is new to gitagent, asks how to get started, wants to install gitagent, set up their first agent, or says 'how do I start?'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for upgrading Grails applications from Grails 7.x to Grails 8, covering Java 21, Groovy 5 name resolution and static compilation, Spring Boot 4.1, Spring Framework 7, dependency management, Micronaut, Jackson 3, Hibernate 7, TagLibs, testing, content negotiation, asset pipeline wildcard paths, and validation behavior changes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a form end to end — field order, grouping, validation, and completion. Use when the artifact is a form. For product-wide error strategy use `error-handling-ux`; for first-run signup use `onboarding-design`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design error prevention, detection, and recovery across a product — message content, placement, and escape routes. Use when errors span multiple flows. For validation inside a single form, use `form-design`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SkillOpt-flavored offline training loop for any SKILL.md. Treats accumulated learn-rule corrections as training trajectories, proposes bounded patches via an optimizer LLM, gates each candidate against a held-out validation set built from the user's own past corrections, and ships only candidates that demonstrably improve the score. Inspired by Microsoft SkillOpt's ReflACT pipeline (rollout → reflect → aggregate → select → update → evaluate) adapted to pro-workflow's SQLite store. Use when a skill has accumulated 8+ learn-rule rows and the user wants the skill itself to get better, not just longer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deploying your agent to AWS, or when a deploy has failed. Handles pre-flight validation, CDK/IAM/quota error diagnosis, version management, rollback, and canary deployments. Triggers on: "deploy my agent", "agentcore deploy", "deploy failed", "CDK error", "rollback", "canary deploy", "pin version", "redeploy", "deploy stuck". Not for production hardening — use agents-harden. Not for adding capabilities before deploy — use agents-build or agents-connect. Not for VPC configuration errors — use agents-build.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing your agent for production — IAM scoping, inbound auth (JWT, SigV4), secrets management, cold start optimization, session lifecycle, rate limiting, input validation, and quota guidance. Triggers on: "production checklist", "harden agent", "production ready", "secure agent", "inbound auth", "going live", "cold start optimization", "session lifecycle", "StopRuntimeSession", "quota", "throttling", "maxVms", "rate limit", "security audit of outbound API calls", "gateway target audit for production", "restrict who can call", "lock down endpoint", "only our app can call". Not for Cedar tool-restriction policies — use agents-connect. Not for quality measurement — use agents-optimize. Not for outbound credential storage or API key wiring — use agents-connect. Not for A2A agent-to-agent auth — use agents-build. Cold start observation and diagnosis (not optimization) routes to agents-debug.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures Amazon CloudFront content delivery across six workflows: when to use CloudFront and how it fits with AWS WAF, Shield, CloudFront Functions, Lambda@Edge, Route 53, and origins (creating a distribution, caching, and Flat Rate Pricing (FRP) versus pay-as-you-go pricing); managing custom-domain TLS certificates (ACM in us-east-1); configuring multi-tenant distributions; protecting origins with origin access control (OAC), VPC origins, and origin mutual TLS (mTLS); securing content with signed URLs and cookies, geographic restrictions, viewer mutual TLS, and edge token validation; and observing traffic with standard and real-time logs. Applicable when the customer wants to put CloudFront in front of content, choose pricing, lock an origin, restrict who can view content, or analyze logs. Not applicable for the Route 53 DNS side of a CloudFront custom domain or failover between distributions (see the route53-cloudfront skill), or for pure-Route 53 DNS work (see the route53 skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the end-to-end AWS resilience lifecycle integrating Resilience Hub v2, Fault Injection Service, and Application Recovery Controller. Covers the Define → Test → Operate workflow: from policy creation through failure mode assessment, to FIS experiment validation, to ARC operational controls. Applicable when the user wants a complete resilience strategy, needs to connect findings to experiments to controls, or is planning a resilience program. Also applicable for the meta question of whether marking NGRH findings as resolved is enough, whether they are "done" after resolving findings, or how to validate findings before resolving them. Not applicable for resolving or remediating a specific individual finding (see resilience-hub-failure-mode-assessment), or when a single service is explicitly named (e.g. "what FIS experiment should I run").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs, reviews, and debugs DynamoDB data layers from design axioms — enumerates access patterns, chooses partition/sort keys and GSIs, decides single-table vs. multi-table, configures Streams, Global Tables, TTL, vector indexes for similarity search, and zero-ETL integrations to OpenSearch/Redshift/SageMaker Lakehouse, and produces a defensible data-layer design with a monthly cost estimate and optional live validation. Applies whenever a user is designing, reviewing, or refactoring anything backed by DynamoDB — schemas, access patterns, GSIs, single- vs. multi-table choices, Streams consumers, transactional outboxes, Global Tables, zero-ETL pipelines, or storing embeddings and running semantic/vector similarity search with SearchVectors on items already in DynamoDB — even when they don't say "axioms" or "design review." Also applies when debugging hot partitions, throttling, unbounded Scans, LWW conflicts, or surprise bills on DynamoDB workloads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。