「repo」の検索結果

Use when working with Gcp Artifact Registry — google Artifact Registry repository management, vulnerability scanning analysis, cleanup policy configuration, and artifact lifecycle management via gcloud CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

REQUIRED helper functions (never raw curl), workspace/repo_slug patterns, suggestion block syntax for code review

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Aws Billing — analyze, break down, and report AWS costs and bills. Covers cost breakdown by service, account, or usage type; monthly/daily billing trends; cost anomaly detection; RI/SP utilization; cost forecasting; credit/discount analysis; and multi-account cost comparison. Uses anti-hallucination rules, mandatory currency/credit detection workflow, and reusable Cost Explorer functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for cache scan, cleanup, skill archiving, and warm-cache reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploratory QA of web apps: find bugs, evidence, reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author in-repo SKILL.md files: frontmatter and structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when internet_learner cycles all report rejected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for the self-evolving civilization - skills, memories, swarm agents, energy economy, grid duels, metacognition. Run `python scripts/autonomous_loop.py --loop` from the repo root (or `darwin_engine.py --full` for skill evolution only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reporting build, test, or deploy results - enforces real tool output over plausible claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, execute, and document validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP <1220>/<1225>/<1226>, ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays whenever the question is whether a procedure is fit for its intended purpose. Triggers include "method validation", "analytical method validation", "AMV", "validation protocol", "acceptance criteria", "linearity", "reportable range", "accuracy and precision", "repeatability", "intermediate precision", "recovery", "LOD", "LOQ", "detection limit", "quantitation limit", "specificity", "robustness", "method transfer", "method comparison", "Deming", "Passing-Bablok", "Bland-Altman", "equivalence testing", "OOS investigation", "ICH Q2", "Q2(R2)", "Q14", "USP 1225", "ICH M10", "incurred sample reanalysis", "ISR", "CLSI EP", and any request to show that an assay works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clean Architecture patterns for Android and Kotlin Multiplatform projects — module structure, dependency rules, UseCases, Repositories, and data layer patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Tavily's multi-source research workflow for comparisons, market analysis, literature-oriented exploration, or detailed cited reports. Use only when bounded search and extraction are insufficient.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Trigger only when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do not trigger for general maintainer lists or non-security ownership questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure GitHub secret scanning and push protection, triage secret alerts, and run local pre-commit secret audits. Use when enabling secret scanning, handling blocked pushes, defining custom patterns, or checking a repo for accidental credentials before commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Netlify projects via netlify.toml and the _headers/_redirects files — covering build settings and deploy contexts alongside environment variables/scopes and the Secrets Controller plus redirect/rewrite/proxy and custom-header rules. Use when setting a build command or publish directory, adding redirect or rewrite or proxy rules, configuring custom headers or basic auth, setting or scoping environment variables and secrets, wiring up a monorepo or SPA fallback, or skipping unnecessary builds. Reach for this whenever you touch netlify.toml or ask "why is my env var undefined in a function" or "how do I redirect this path".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when tasks involve reading, creating, or reviewing PDF files where rendering and layout matter; prefer visual checks by rendering pages (Poppler) and use Python tools such as `reportlab`, `pdfplumber`, and `pypdf` for generation and extraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage Netlify deploys — Git continuous deployment, CLI manual/anonymous deploys, Deploy to Netlify buttons, drag-and-drop, and per-context netlify.toml build settings. Use when linking a repo, deploying from the CLI, setting up Deploy Previews or branch deploys, configuring deploy contexts, adding skew protection, fixing a failed or secrets-flagged deploy, or wiring build hooks and Deploy to Netlify buttons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run AI agent tasks remotely on Netlify using Claude, Codex, or Gemini. Use when the user wants to run an AI agent on their site, get a second opinion from another model, or delegate development tasks to run remotely against their repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Hugging Face Hub via MCP server tools. Search models, datasets, Spaces, papers. Get repo details, fetch documentation, run compute jobs, and use Gradio Spaces as AI tools. Available when connected to the HF MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then guide a user-directed decision loop for the selected candidate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。