「search」の検索結果

Coder-agent working-file budget discipline: keep the editable working set (files you /add into writable context) under ~25k tokens, separate "read" from "edit", delegate breadth to a read-only repo-map, and drop files once edited. Use when an LLM coder-agent edits multiple files, when the working set must stay focused, or when the model starts editing the wrong file / missing targets because too much context dilutes attention. Search keywords: context window full, agent edits wrong file, too much context, /add /drop files, working file budget, context dilution, lost in the middle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhancement-overlay SOP for adding sparse (BM25 / keyword) retrieval alongside dense (embedding) retrieval. Activate when a calling agent is building, reviewing, or debugging a retrieval pipeline whose corpus contains exact-match tokens — identifiers, error codes, SKUs, API/function names, proper nouns, citations, rare jargon — that pure dense embedding silently misses. Encodes the single decision rule (**hybrid is traffic-driven, not theoretical: add sparse only when the query share that depends on exact tokens is non-trivial**), the wiring of QueryFusionRetriever-style fusion (RRF vs alpha-weighted), and per-query-type alpha tuning. Frame the work as recovering lexical identity that dense pooling destroys, not as "add keyword search for completeness". Cross-links [[llamaindex]].

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lifecycle SOP for **per-model prompt artifacts** — the compiled prompts, instructions, few-shot demos, edit-format pins, and embedding-bound indices that change behavior when the underlying LM, dataset, or framework version changes. Activate when adopting compiled prompts (DSPy, GEPA, BootstrapFewShot output), when supporting multiple LMs in production, when a provider deprecates a model snapshot, or when a framework deprecates a config surface (LlamaIndex `ServiceContext` → `Settings`, Aider edit-format defaults). Do NOT activate for one-off raw prompt edits or for truly model-agnostic system prompts that have been swap-tested. Search keywords: prompt portability, model swap, recompile prompt, model deprecation, prompt per model, prompt breaks on new model, version compiled prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-framework enhancement overlay for choosing a multi-agent topology BEFORE writing any agent. A binary-question rubric — is single-agent + tools enough? do agents need to know about each other? does the output need one voice? — maps the answer to single-agent / supervisor / swarm / sequential / hierarchical. Activates when a coder agent is tempted to "split the work into roles" or reaches for a multi-agent framework. Encodes the *selection rubric* that the per-framework skills assume but never surface. Search keywords: when to use multi-agent, single vs multi agent, do I need multiple agents, supervisor vs swarm, multi-agent vs single agent, agent team design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Split a multi-call LM workflow by cognitive load, not by accuracy: let one strong model make the few reasoning decisions and a cheap model do the many mechanical executions (Aider architect+editor, DSPy optimizer-LM vs task-LM, vLLM speculative draft+target, LangGraph supervisor+worker are the same shape). Use when designing or cost-optimizing a pipeline that calls an LM many times, when deciding which steps need a strong reasoner vs a cheap executor, or when adding an escalation valve for when the cheap tier degrades. Search keywords: reduce LLM cost, cheaper model, lower token cost, model cascade, route to cheap model, strong model plus cheap model, LLM cost optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ENHANCE overlay on [[dspy]] — the upfront rubric for choosing a reasoning SHAPE (Predict / ChainOfThought / ReAct / ProgramOfThought) BEFORE you write a prompt or pick an optimizer. The local `dspy` skill lists the modules but never surfaces the *selection criterion*: reasoning shape is chosen by task structure, not by reflexively defaulting to CoT. Activate every time a new LM-calling node/step is added to a pipeline. Do NOT activate for one-shot prompts, optimizer/teleprompter choice (that is the dspy SOP's job), or non-LM control flow. Search keywords: chain of thought vs ReAct, when to use CoT, reasoning type, ReAct vs CoT vs PoT, which dspy module, predict vs chain of thought.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decomposed, multi-criteria metric design for LLM pipelines. The metric IS the model — change the metric and the optimizer changes behavior. Decompose by default; bool during compile, float during eval; calibrate against human; mitigate judge bias. Search keywords: LLM-as-judge, llm as judge, eval metric, evaluation score, scoring function, rubric, RAGAS, G-Eval, judge bias, verbosity bias, how to evaluate LLM output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhancement overlay for multi-agent / tool-using coder agents. Encodes the per-agent tool- scoping discipline that role-based frameworks (CrewAI, LangChain) document only as a passing best-practice: which agent gets which tool, and why blanket-sharing every tool to every agent is a correctness and blast-radius risk. Activates when an agent system has tools AND there is more than one agent (or one agent holding many tools). Treat a tool as a capability grant; scope by least-privilege. ENHANCE overlay — read alongside [[crewai]], [[agentsop-http-tool-wrapping]], [[agentsop-llm-tool-idempotency]]. Search keywords: which tools per agent, least-privilege agent, agent tool access, tool permissions, limit agent tools, scope tools to roles.overlay_type: enhancement

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for making side-effectful agent tools idempotent — so when an LLM tool call is retried (timeout, framework resume, user re-run, model duplicate emit), the second call is a no-op instead of a double-send. The load-bearing premise: the LM cannot promise it'll call exactly once; the tool must promise the second call is safe. Framework-agnostic — applies to LangGraph node bodies that re-run on resume, MCP tools, OpenAI tool-calling retries, CrewAI delegated tool invocations, and direct HTTP wrappers. Search keywords: duplicate email sent, charged twice, exactly-once, idempotency key, tool called twice, retry side effect, double-send, at-least-once delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for promoting a prose prompt into a typed DSPy Signature. This is an ENHANCE overlay on top of the [[dspy]] library skill: it does NOT teach DSPy syntax — it answers the coder-agent decision "when do I stop hand-writing a prompt string and declare it as a `dspy.Signature`, and how do I name/describe its fields so the optimizer and the calling code both get a clean contract." Activate when: a prompt string grows past ~50 lines; the LM output is consumed by code (parsed, branched on, stored) rather than read by a human; the same prompt is reused across >1 call site; or a teammate asks "should this be a Signature?". Do NOT activate for one-shot throwaway prompts, or for HOW-TO questions about DSPy modules /optimizers/compile — defer those to the [[dspy]] skill and the [[agentsop-dspy]] workflow skill. Search keywords: typed prompt, structured prompt, DSPy Signature, prompt as a function, prompt contract, when to formalize a prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhancement overlay — version the WHOLE deployable LLM-app artifact as one bundle: prompts + compiled programs + model snapshot pins + retrieval config + eval-set version, versioned together so a deploy is reproducible and rollback is atomic. Activate when preparing to deploy an LLM app, when asking "what exactly is running in prod right now?", when a deploy must be reproducible months later, or when an incident needs a clean rollback. The core reframe: an LLM app artifact is NOT an ML model — it is a manifest over many independently-mutable parts, not one weights file. Do NOT activate for one-off prompt edits with no deploy, for a single-component demo, or where a vendor owns the whole prompt lifecycle. For versioning ONE compiled prompt use [[agentsop-per-model-artifacts]]; for the CI comparison mechanism use [[agentsop-regression-gate]]. Search keywords: prompt versioning, reproducible deploy, what is running in prod, rollback LLM app, model pinning, prompt registry, version prompts and config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal discipline for any LM-driven loop — agent retries, plan-act-observe, multi-agent handoffs, optimiser passes, test-fix cycles. Encodes the one rule every framework documents quietly and every team relearns expensively: the LM in the loop is NEVER a reliable terminator. Termination must be provided by an explicit counter + exit predicate + stagnation signal + escalation path that live OUTSIDE the LM's control. This is a tool- level, framework-agnostic skill. It maps onto LangGraph (recursion_limit + state counter + interrupt), CrewAI (max_iter + max_rpm + human_input), Claude / OpenAI SDKs (max_iterations + tool_use_budget), DSPy (declared evaluation budget), Aider (REPL + explicit retry cap), and AutoGen (max_consecutive_auto_reply). Search keywords: infinite loop, recursion limit, recursion_limit, GraphRecursionError, max iterations, max_iter, agent stuck, agent won't stop, runaway agent, ReAct loop not terminating, agent repeating itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FHIR API development guide for building healthcare endpoints. Use when: (1) Creating FHIR REST endpoints (Patient, Observation, Encounter, Condition, MedicationRequest), (2) Validating FHIR resources and returning proper HTTP status codes and error responses, (3) Implementing SMART on FHIR authorization and OAuth scopes, (4) Working with Bundles, transactions, batch operations, or search pagination. Covers FHIR R4 resource structures, required fields, value sets (status codes, gender, intent), coding systems (LOINC, SNOMED, RxNorm, ICD-10), and OperationOutcome error handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate clinical trial protocols for medical devices or drugs. This skill should be used when users say "Create a clinical trial protocol", "Generate protocol for [device/drug]", "Help me design a clinical study", "Research similar trials for [intervention]", or when developing FDA submission documentation for investigational products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct proactive, hypothesis-driven threat hunts — search SIEM / EDR / logs for adversaries who haven't tripped an alert yet. ATT&CK-driven, hypothesis-based methodology. Use when the user mentions 'threat hunting,' 'proactive hunt,' 'TaHiTI,' 'PEAK framework,' 'MITRE ATT&CK hunt,' 'hypothesis-driven hunt,' 'hunt hypothesis,' 'living off the land,' 'LOLBins,' 'beaconing,' 'lateral movement detection,' 'data staging,' 'persistence hunting,' or wants to find threats that have evaded existing detections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gather and correlate open source intelligence from public sources for authorized investigations, threat intelligence, and attack surface assessment. Use when the user mentions 'OSINT,' 'open source intelligence,' 'digital footprint,' 'public records,' 'threat intelligence,' 'investigate a domain,' or needs to research a target using publicly available data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scholarly writing and research compliance. Use for CRediT, preregistration, Plan S, Nelson Memo, preprints, ORCID, LLM disclosure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview preparation and recording-consent law. Use for research, question frameworks, one-party or all-party consent rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read from a UModel object-graph semantic layer with the `umctl` CLI (MCP alternative noted). Three kinds of read: (1) entities & relationships / topology (`.entity`, `.topo`) and (2) the model itself (`.umodel`, and `.entity_set` methods, including entity-linked `list_skills`) return real rows; (3) metrics & logs (`get_metrics` / `get_logs`) return an executable *plan* — PromQL / Elasticsearch DSL with the entity id pre-substituted — that you run against the backend. Against a PaaS endpoint the same calls return data rows instead of a plan. Use to query or read UModel entities, relations, topology, or model metadata; to read a service's metrics or logs; to look up services and dependencies; or to discover what objects, datasets, and methods exist. For root-cause analysis on top of these reads, see the `umodel-rca` skill. Triggers: UModel, object graph, .entity / .topo / .umodel / .entity_set, query entities, read topology, read metrics / logs, get_metrics / get_logs, list services / dependencies / datasets / skills, 实体查询, 关系/拓扑查询, 读模型, 读指标, 读日志, 查指标, 查日志, 查服务依赖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrade project dependencies with breaking change research for major version updates. Use when the user asks to "update dependencies", "upgrade packages", "upgrade dependencies", "update deps", "upgrade deps", "update npm deps", "update Swift packages", "cargo update", "go get updates", "bundle update", "pip upgrade", or "update GitHub Actions".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the least code that works, and cut what an AI agent over-built. Use on any coding task: write, fix, refactor, or review a diff. Also when the user says 'less', 'simplify', 'too complex', 'over-engineered', or 'what can we delete'. Not for prose, research, or non-code questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANUAL-ONLY: challenge a product idea, design, PRD, or architecture from first principles. Use only when the user names this skill. Research first, then write a local review and PRD handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when drafting GitHub issues for the Positron repository. It provides workflows for searching duplicates, selecting appropriate labels, gathering complete context through questioning, and writing terse, fluff-free issues that precisely describe what is needed or wrong. The skill prepares issues for manual submission by the user. Use this skill when the user asks to draft or prepare an issue for Positron.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。