「check」の検索結果

Measure Mycelium's own scaffold token cost (CLAUDE.md + engine + harness + canvas + memory) and surface a structured estimate. One-shot audit; pair with /framework-health for trend tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose CircleCI failures for a branch, PR, and scheduled nightly builds. Use when asked to check CI, a build, or nightly; report evidence and suggested fixes without opening a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use HTMLHint in .NET repositories that ship static HTML output or standalone frontend templates. Use when a repo needs a focused CLI lint gate for DOM structure, invalid attributes, and basic HTML correctness checks on static pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `Roslynator` analyzer packages and optional CLI for .NET. Use when a repo wants broad C# static analysis, auto-fix flows, dead-code detection, optional CLI checks, or extra rules beyond the SDK analyzers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the free first-party `dotnet format` CLI for .NET formatting and analyzer fixes. Use when a .NET repo needs formatting commands, `--verify-no-changes` CI checks, or `.editorconfig`-driven code style enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use SonarJS-derived rules in .NET repositories that ship JavaScript or TypeScript frontends and need deeper bug-risk, code-smell, or cognitive-complexity checks than a minimal ESLint baseline. Use when the repo wants `eslint-plugin-sonarjs` locally or already runs SonarQube or SonarCloud in CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for any cap-table number, mechanic, or date before a founder signs, from a single SAFE, note or warrant described in chat or a quick 'is this dilution reasonable?' check to any draft or signed SAFE, note, term sheet, option plan, AoA, Carta XLSX, or spreadsheet. A single question gets a short cited answer in about 2–3 minutes; the full report, about 5–10 minutes, runs only when the founder shares documents or asks for it. Source-cited deterministic math (YC, NVCA, Cooley GO) for SAFE/note conversion, priced-round dilution, anti-dilution, option pools, warrants, MFN chains, dual-class voting, QSBS and Israeli §102 dates, and Israeli ↔ Delaware flips. NOT for waterfall modeling, cumulative dividends, RSUs, 83(b), 409A, SPAC, warrant repricing, or pure term definitions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds credible TAM/SAM/SOM analysis with external validation and sensitivity testing for startup fundraising: top-down, bottom-up, or both. Use when the user asks to size a market or check market claims and gives something to size: a product or service description, a market segment, or a deck with TAM/SAM/SOM claims. A full run takes about 15–20 minutes and searches the web, 30 or more with a large data room or a revision round, so for a passing question about market size, answer briefly in chat and offer the analysis instead of starting it. When it runs, every figure is externally sourced and stress-tested, never estimated from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews startup financial models for investor readiness: validates unit economics, stress-tests runway scenarios, and benchmarks metrics against stage-appropriate targets. Use the full review, about 10–15 minutes, when the user provides a financial model (Excel, CSV, or a model pasted as text) and asks for review, validation, runway analysis, or unit-economics scoring. For a single money question with figures to compute, such as 'how long do I have?' or 'is a 4x burn multiple bad?', use its shorter quick check, so the answer comes from the calculator and dated benchmarks, not mental arithmetic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps a startup's competitive landscape, scores moat strength across 6+ dimensions, and writes an investor-ready competition narrative with a positioning map. Use when the user asks for a competitive landscape, moat analysis, or positioning review and gives enough to work from: a deck, a list of competitors, or a clearly named startup. A full run takes about 30–40 minutes and searches the web, so for a passing question such as 'who are my competitors?' or 'is that a real moat?', answer briefly in chat and offer the analysis instead of starting it. When it runs, the competitor set and moat scores are checked adversarially, never recalled from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintainer-only. Use when triaging inbound GitHub issues and pull requests on skyf0xx/hedgehog — "triage the issues", "check the PRs", "review inbound", "what's in the queue". Reads each item read-only, judges it for security and for whether it is real, then fixes and closes or comments and closes. Not part of the Hedgehog discipline a consuming project copies; this only applies to the Hedgehog repo itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever writing a PR title/description, a commit message body, a code review comment, or an issue — in Hedgehog's own repo or any consuming project. Triggers on "open a PR", "write the PR description", "comment on this PR", "file an issue". Covers writing style (terse, info-dense, Simplified Technical English), the Why/What shape, folding deep reasoning under `<details>`, and the pre-open checklist (CI status, scope, verified claims only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use at the start of any session on a project with a build graph (`.hedgehog/hedgehog.db`), and again at every claim/dispatch/verify cycle within it. Owns consuming the build graph — claiming task packets, delegating each to the layer's agent, running `hedgehog verify` to gate the commit, recording debt and decisions, the intent check at an intent's last layer, and when to clear context. Not for a build agent handed an already-claimed packet — that agent never claims, dispatches, or verifies; this skill is the orchestrating session's own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check that a locally running site's WebMCP tools register and execute correctly. Use to verify WebMCP tools, confirm document.modelContext tools appear on the right pages and auth states, or test @nekuda/webmcp-sdk tools in a browser.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze web traffic, SEO performance, and search engine trends using Google Search Console, Google Analytics 4, and Bing Webmaster Tools. Use when the user asks to analyze traffic, check SEO, or find keyword opportunities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes diagnostic investigation tasks to test debugging hypotheses. Runs tests, traces execution, checks git history, and reports evidence. (converted from agent)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a competitive programming or LeetCode solution for correctness, edge cases, and performance. Use when asked to "verify my solution", "check my code", "is this solution correct", "test my solution", "review my competitive programming answer", "validate my algorithm", or any solution verification request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes the Agent Alchemy plugin ecosystem to detect dependency issues across all plugin groups

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference patterns for graph algorithm problems including BFS, DFS, Dijkstra, topological sort, union-find, MST, Bellman-Ford, and bipartite checking. Provides recognition signals, Python templates, edge cases, and common mistakes for each technique. Use when solving problems involving graphs, trees, shortest paths, connectivity, or dependency ordering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when imp outputs differ between two paths that should agree - chunk sizes, prefill vs decode, prefix-cache resend, two engines (imp vs llama.cpp vs HF), two builds or kernels - "output changes with chunk size", "first token differs", "logprobs moved", "which layer diverges", "who is right, imp or llama.cpp", "near-tie". Do NOT use for repetition loops or garbage output (check-degeneration), a new arch that loads wrong (add-model-arch), or perf (benchmark-cuda).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing the imp codebase for structural debt, dead code, god-objects/files, duplication, flag sprawl, or deciding whether a cleanup is worth shipping - "structure audit", "tech debt", "is this still used", "dead code", "refactor for clarity", "should we split this file", "remove this flag", "file size gate red", "alloc sites gate red". Do NOT use for build/test mechanics (building-and-testing), perf/kernel work (benchmark-cuda / sm120-cuda-expert), or output quality (check-degeneration).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, reviewing, or optimizing CUDA kernels targeting sm_120a (RTX 5090 / Consumer Blackwell, GB202) in the imp inference engine. Triggers on CUDA/PTX kernel code, shared-memory layout, bank conflicts, tensor-core MMA (mxf4nvf4, tf32, 3xTF32/3xFP16), GEMV/GEMM/attention/quantization/GDN-scan kernels, decode tok/s under expected, kernel emitting HMMA instead of mxf4nvf4, occupancy, register pressure, __launch_bounds__, spills, PDL. Pair with `benchmark-cuda` for measurement and `check-degeneration` after hot-path changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses founding team composition, complementarity, equity split rationale, and execution capability. Use when evaluating founding teams, assessing management risk, or conducting reference checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures pre-trade compliance with restricted list screening, position limits, and regulatory constraint verification. Use when running pre-trade compliance, screening restricted securities, or verifying trading limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。