9,661 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Test AI agent systems for tool abuse, unauthorized actions, privilege escalation through tool chaining, and safety bypass via agentic workflows. Use this skill when assessing autonomous AI agents that use tool-calling (function calling, plugins, actions) to interact with external systems. Covers multi-step attack chains, implicit trust exploitation, and capability boundary testing for AI agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute and analyze AI Data Poisoning attacks. By subtly injecting malicious or targeted misinformation into an LLM's training or fine-tuning dataset, an attacker can covertly manipulate the model's future outputs, implant backdoors, or enforce biases without altering the model architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anti-debugging detection and bypass playbook. Use when reversing protected binaries that detect debuggers via ptrace, PEB flags, timing checks, or signal/exception handlers on Linux and Windows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically extract hidden system prompts, core directives, and invisible context intentionally concealed within Large Language Model (LLM) applications. This skill utilizes targeted linguistic engineering and boundary manipulation to bypass prompt opacity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute sophisticated Prompt Injection and Jailbreak techniques against Large Language Models (LLMs) to bypass safety filters, extract system prompts, and manipulate the AI's output to perform malicious or disallowed actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Arbitrary write to RCE playbook. Use when you have an arbitrary write primitive (from heap exploitation, format string, or OOB write) and need to convert it into code execution by targeting GOT, hooks, _IO_FILE vtable, exit_funcs, TLS_dtor_list, modprobe_path, .fini_array, or C++ vtables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bootstrap a new standalone skill repo under gaia-research/ from the canonical template set at gaia-research/gaia-research/templates/skill-repo/. Handles the full flow: interactive prompts for all placeholders, fetches templates via the GitHub API, substitutes values, creates the new repo (gaia-research/skill-<name>), writes README.md / SKILL.md / install.sh / .gitignore / LICENSE / powered-by-gaia.svg, makes the initial commit and pushes. Also supports update mode: re-applies the template structure to a pre-existing skill repo and opens a draft PR with the drift. Use when the user says "new skill repo", "bootstrap a skill repo", "/skill-template", "create skill-foo", "spin up a gaia-research skill repo", "template a new skill", "align skill-fuse to the template", or "/skill-template update <repo>". Requires: gh CLI (authenticated with gaia-research org access), python3, git.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Append a session/state snapshot to MEMORY.md (regardless of where it lives — for this repo it's `founder/MEMORY.md`). Use when the user says "snapshot memory", "save state to memory", "/memory-snapshot", "log what happened in MEMORY", or otherwise asks to record the current session's outcomes for the next orchestrator. Locates the project's MEMORY.md, prepends a dated entry above the previous snapshot (newest first), preserves every existing entry (NEVER overwrites or truncates), and reports back the file path + byte delta. Not for one-off feedback memories (use the user-level memory system at ~/.claude/.../memory/ for those). Not for trimming or deleting old entries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This repo is indexed by graft/. For ANY task here, whether understanding how something works, finding where code lives, tracing what calls a symbol or what a change breaks, or scoping an edit, get your context from graft before grepping or reading source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculate and display the token usage, turns, and estimated cost for the active session and subagent runs by parsing the harness session logs. Use when the user asks for token usage, session cost, or types `/pi-cost`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Focused single-target audit of one Gaia skill, named skill, or real-skill catalog item. Use this skill when: auditing a specific skill by ID or name, a skill looks overpromoted, evidence feels thin or dead, a contributor's skill seems outdated or superseded, the rank doesn't match the source quality, evidence is mapped to the wrong Evidence Type, a skill at 3★+ is missing a working GitHub link, someone asks "does this skill deserve its stars?", or you want the smallest possible correction with validation — not a bulk sweep. This is NOT for bulk curation passes (use /gaia-curate for that) or meta-level registry sweeps (use /gaia-meta-audit). It is specifically for "fix this one skill, get it right."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One-fix-at-a-time, approval-gated design fix recovery. Given a checklist of fixes (handover doc, CHECKLIST.md, or inline list), applies each individually, presents a diff, and waits for an explicit APPROVE / REJECT / NO CHANGES decision before committing. Trigger phrases: /design-iteration, "go through the checklist one by one", "fix these one at a time", "bucket recovery", "design fix pass".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run this skill for Phase 3 of the evidence verification pipeline — the adversarial audit step. Use when you need to check the evidence data lake for bad data before ingestion: dead links, wrong URL formats (tree/ vs blob/), subjective wording ("elite", "high-quality"), stale migration notes, benchmark catalog misuse/vendor-claim leakage, or skills whose star evidence conflicts with classified evidence level. Triggers on phrases like: "audit the data lake", "adversarial check", "ev-adversarial-audit", "check for noise in evidence", "flag bad evidence", "run the audit phase", "quality check the by-type files", or any reference to Phase 3 of the pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measure CI churn cost for a pull request: how many commits and how many CI-compute seconds were burned on avoidable "fix the CI" push rounds. Use when you want to understand the efficiency cost of a PR's iteration cycle, get actionable pre-push check suggestions, or include a churn summary in a pipeline report. Triggers: "ci churn", "how much CI did we burn", "avoidable commits", "ci efficiency", "wasted CI time", "churn report", "/ci-churn". Called automatically by /fp-drift at pipeline close.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce the rendered evidence a human-gated frontend PR owes its reviewer: capture each changed surface (plus the before state for anything modified, plus mobile width), then generate one self-contained local HTML page the founder can open and review without checking anything out. Use when a PR is gated by the "Frontend changes are HUMAN-GATED" section of CLAUDE.md, or when the user says "/design-gate", "screenshot evidence for this PR", "prep this for founder review", "build the design evidence page", "what does this look like before and after". The page comes from a template script, not hand-written markup. Output is session-local and never committed. Do NOT use for non-gated changes: typo/grammar/factual fixes in an unchanged block, dead link targets, alt/ARIA fixes with no visual change, cache-bust bumps, or refactors with no rendered diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and repair Gaia user-tree timelines so every skill's current rank is explained by a chain of Hero's Journey events. Trigger this skill when: a contributor's profile chart shows a stale rank (e.g. still shows 3★ after a demotion to 1★); someone asks to "trace what happened" to a skill's rank; `validate_timelines.py` is failing in CI; you need to backfill missing `demote` or `rank_up` events before cutting a release; a skill was reclassified or Star-Bar-reset and the user tree was never updated; or any time the registry node and user tree disagree on a skill's current level. Uses `scripts/trace_timeline.py` (dry-run + apply) and `scripts/validate_timelines.py` (CI gate). Do NOT hand-edit `timeline[]` arrays — the script synthesises properly labelled events with `previousValue`/`newValue` so the rank chart plots correctly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 2 of the evidence verification pipeline. Validates GitHub star counts in registry skill files against live GitHub API data and flags stale or inflated metrics without repartitioning evidence by rank. Use this after /ev-collection has compiled the unified data lake and before /ev-adversarial-audit begins. Trigger phrases: "verify stars", "check star counts", "refresh stargazer metrics", "run star verification", "ev-star-verification", "Phase 2", "live star check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-review intake closing skill. After an intake is resolved (whether accepted via review/meta PR merge or rejected/deferred at triage/evidence review), run this skill to post standardized, personalized closing comments on the PR (if any) and each intake issue. Comments include: evidence pipeline findings with /trust-appraise TM output, per-row artifact scores, decisions rationale, path-to-promotion/acceptance guidance, and a mandatory badge status note including the universal Powered by Gaia badge. Use after curation completes, before or immediately after merge for accepted intakes, or immediately upon rejection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Train safer, more steerable AI by having the model critique and revise itself against an explicit written constitution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research libraries and APIs automatically by pulling live documentation into the agent's context before answering. Use when writing code against unfamiliar or fast-moving libraries so examples match current versions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Elicit step-by-step reasoning from language models to boost accuracy on math, logic, and multi-step problems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Proven prompts behind viral AI-made videos across 4 models — Claude, Muse AI, ChatGPT, Gemini. Browse by model, category, or tech tag, copy a creator's prompt, adapt it to your own model and renderer. Use when you need a motion-graphic, explainer visual, 3D scene, interactive animation, or AI video-gen prompt that already worked in the wild.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire or the AI annex buyers now attach to it, executing sales sequences, coaching qualification, or deciding what the website's AI chat agent is allowed to say. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, reply handling, reply classification, out-of-office replies, auto-replies counted as replies, our reply rate is inflated, prospect replied remove me, opt-out by reply, is this list ready to send, launch readiness, CRM segment outbound, we emailed a current customer, outbound hit an open opportunity, ownerless leads, prospects engaging our competitors, competitor connections, displacement list, is this personalization creepy, can we mention they visited our site, signal freshness, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, objection handling, common objections, why do we keep hearing this objection, mine call transcripts for objections, objection register, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, AI security questionnaire, AI annex, AI vendor due diligence, the buyer is asking if we train on their data, do you train on customer data, which model do you use, model provider sub-processor, AI subprocessor disclosure, where does inference run, can the customer turn the AI feature off, AI-CAIQ, CSA AI Controls Matrix, ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Article 50, are we a provider or a deployer, AI feature disclosure, our model vendor changed and nobody told the buyer, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss, website chatbot, chat widget, AI chat agent, AI SDR, inbound AI SDR, conversational marketing, live chat, what should our chatbot be allowed to say, our chatbot quoted the wrong price, the bot promised a discount, do we have to disclose it is AI, EU AI Act chatbot disclosure, chatbot handoff to sales, chat transcript review, prompt injection on our chatbot, Drift, Qualified, Intercom.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。