8,114 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Build and verify Error boundary state for Commerce and checkout with Bootstrap v5.3 using a working semantic implementation, responsive RTL/LTR behavior, theme tokens, test plan and design verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and verify Expandable filter section for Documentation and knowledge with Bootstrap v5.3 using a working semantic implementation, responsive RTL/LTR behavior, theme tokens, test plan and design verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and verify Error boundary state for Mobile-first interface with Bootstrap v5.3 using a working semantic implementation, responsive RTL/LTR behavior, theme tokens, test plan and design verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and verify Error boundary state for Marketing landing with Bootstrap v5.3 using a working semantic implementation, responsive RTL/LTR behavior, theme tokens, test plan and design verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and verify Error boundary state for Documentation and knowledge with Bootstrap v5.3 using a working semantic implementation, responsive RTL/LTR behavior, theme tokens, test plan and design verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and verify Error boundary state for Data-heavy application with Bootstrap v5.3 using a working semantic implementation, responsive RTL/LTR behavior, theme tokens, test plan and design verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and verify Expandable filter section for Commerce and checkout with Bootstrap v5.3 using a working semantic implementation, responsive RTL/LTR behavior, theme tokens, test plan and design verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and verify Expandable filter section for Mobile-first interface with Bootstrap v5.3 using a working semantic implementation, responsive RTL/LTR behavior, theme tokens, test plan and design verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and verify Expandable filter section for Data-heavy application with Bootstrap v5.3 using a working semantic implementation, responsive RTL/LTR behavior, theme tokens, test plan and design verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and verify Expandable filter section for Marketing landing with Bootstrap v5.3 using a working semantic implementation, responsive RTL/LTR behavior, theme tokens, test plan and design verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test-driven development: production-level red green refactor and boundaries. Use when implementing, reviewing or testing test-driven development for React, Vite, Next.js or Perfect_AI projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
React component architecture: production-level ownership, composition, state, error boundaries. Use when implementing, reviewing or testing react component architecture for React, Vite, Next.js or Perfect_AI projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
تاریخ شمسی assistant for Codex; apply when building Persian/RTL web products, localizing content or integrating the related Iranian workflow. Local independent adaptation inspired by publicly documented VibeFarsi topics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Next.js architecture: production-level RSC boundaries, routes, metadata, cache. Use when implementing, reviewing or testing next.js architecture for React, Vite, Next.js or Perfect_AI projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits and realigns UI to match design system standards, spacing, tokens, and patterns. Use when the user mentions consistency, design drift, mismatched styles, tokens, or wants to bring a feature back in line with the system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds reusable Convex components with isolated tables and app-facing APIs. Use for new components, reusable backend modules, integrations, or component boundary work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shared foundation for all human-voice writing skills. Load before any profession-specific skill. Contains: burstiness principle, perplexity principle, soul injection techniques, community-discovered AI patterns with sources, additional core patterns, banned AI vocabulary, and scoring rubric.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: implement a scoped ticket, fix a bug, add tests, prepare a PR-ready code change, or reuse a standard builder workflow across software engineer agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: assumptions audit, audit assumptions, check for hidden assumptions, plan/ticket has ambiguous scope edges, pre-flight before finalizing a ticket, unstated assumptions, or 'what am I assuming'. Surfaces unstated assumptions, ambiguous scope edges, and untested preconditions in a finished plan/ticket/ADR before it is handed to Builder. Optional pass — Architect judges when to apply it; not a mandatory gate on every ticket.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use immediately after RBR confirms a root cause, or after any confirmed finding from security-audit-lens, legacy-investigation-lens, a scan skill, or a Critical/Required code-review finding, before considering the finding complete. Checks whether the confirmed defect is one instance of a structurally identical pattern elsewhere in the same file family, workflow, or business-domain area, and folds in or explicitly defers every other instance found. Mandatory for Architect — not an optional lens the agent judges when to apply.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: UI standards discovery, UI pattern research, UI audit, pre-handoff UI state coverage review, or when a business-specific child skill needs a stack-agnostic UI methodology to load first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal guardrails loaded by every agent. Defines Verify Before Reporting (VBR), Write-Ahead Log (WAL), and the security baseline. Always-on, role-independent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: investigating a legacy, inherited, third-party-built, or otherwise newly-unfamiliar codebase before scoping a migration or major refactor. Formalizes a repeatable five-step investigation pass — entry-point census, business-rule classification, side-effect/idempotency cataloging, implicit-contract discovery, semantic-duplication detection — plus a canonical per-project Open Questions document. Requires checkable signals: ticket keywords or prior documentation gaps. Not a mandatory gate; reserved for entry-point-heavy work in code areas with no prior investigation record.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: a general codebase assessment, pre-migration/pre-rewrite review, feasibility question about converting/migrating/rewriting a codebase (how hard, effort), or explicit security-focused request needs a structured, repeatable security audit pass covering hardcoded secrets, injection-prone constructs, auth/debug backdoors, insecure config defaults, and weak credential storage. Complements (does not replace) the built-in /security-review command. Not a mandatory gate on every ticket.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。