「abstractions」の検索結果

Crossplane for infrastructure as code using Kubernetes CRDs. Use when the user needs to provision and manage cloud resources declaratively through Kubernetes APIs, compose custom infrastructure abstractions, or build internal platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for every task that plans, writes, edits, debugs, tests, refactors, reviews, or maintains code. Apply to professional repositories, scripts, apps, services, prototypes, beginner work, vibe coding, and bounded code changes inside large systems. Choose the fewest clear lines, files, paths, states, and abstractions that correctly implement the requested behavior. Do not invent fallbacks, compatibility paths, defensive layers, or future scale without evidence. Do not use for ordinary conversation, emotional support, prose, translation, summarization, social-media content, or general research or technical discussion that is not part of planning, changing, or reviewing code. Never weaken real security, integrity, concurrency, compatibility, privacy, accessibility, legal, or regulatory requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repo-wide structural-maintainability review — code-judo restructurings, 1k-line file guard, anti-spaghetti branching, canonical-layer enforcement, anti-magic abstractions, explicit type/boundary contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critical Akka.NET best practices including EventStream vs DistributedPubSub, supervision strategies, error handling, Props vs DependencyResolver, work distribution patterns, and cluster/local mode abstractions for testability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert C++ developer specializing in modern C++20/23, systems programming, and high-performance computing. Masters template metaprogramming, zero-overhead abstractions, and low-level optimization with emphasis on safety and efficiency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to simplify, clean, or refine code. Not for new abstractions or whole-codebase refactors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Readable functional patterns — orchestrators, pure functions, named abstractions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design Agentforce conversations that span multiple turns without losing context: session variable scoping, conversation memory, clarifying-question patterns, topic-to-topic (now subagent) handoff, and the right abstractions for accumulating state across turns. NOT for deciding the topic boundaries themselves or out-of-scope behavior — use agentforce/agent-topic-design. NOT for single-turn agent actions and their input/output contracts — use agentforce/agent-actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write readable, maintainable code: naming, small functions, clear control flow, and honest abstractions. Use when writing new code, refactoring, or reviewing for readability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an explicitly requested, unusually strict dygo maintainability audit that seeks structural simplification, removes accidental complexity, and challenges weak abstractions without changing behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-build pass reducing complexity without changing behavior. Catches dead code, needless abstractions, over-engineering. NOT for style (mk:clean-code) or diff review (mk:review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation simplification pass. Reduces complexity without changing behavior. Use after Phase 3 (Build GREEN) and before Phase 4 (Review). Catches dead code, unnecessary abstractions, over-engineering, and redundant patterns. Triggers on "simplify", "clean up", "reduce complexity", "too complex". NOT for style/convention enforcement (see mk:clean-code); NOT for reviewing diffs or PRs (see mk:review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review proposed abstractions, dependencies, and configuration for concrete consumers and maintenance cost when simplifying a design or checking overengineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate, introduce, or refactor persistence abstractions when direct Eloquent is insufficient. Use for repository requests, complex aggregate reconstruction, or multiple persistence implementations; reject CRUD wrappers without a concrete benefit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor duplicated code by extracting helpers, shared abstractions, or clearer reusable structure. Use when asked to apply DRY, remove duplication, consolidate repeated logic, or run `/refactor:dry`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, grade, rewrite, and issue funny evidence-backed tickets for generic AI-slop patterns in prose, social posts, UI/design, and code. Use when asked to de-slop writing, humanize AI copy, grade a draft, review a landing page or generated interface, remove vague claims and repetitive rhetoric, inspect AI-written code for generic abstractions and happy-path-only logic, or ticket someone for a specific quality offense. Do not use to determine whether AI authored something.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, simplicity, and maintainability. Identifies unnecessary abstractions, duplicated logic, oversized functions, missing error handling, and naming issues — then fixes them automatically before presenting the result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when refactoring, evaluating diff size, or tempted to add abstractions, layers, or signal threading. Bias toward deletion and the smallest change that solves the problem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。