「acceptance」の検索結果

Vendor certification acceptance criteria and equivalence mapping. Covers ISO 27701, SOC 2 Privacy, APEC CBPR, EU Code of Conduct evaluation, certification scope analysis, gap supplementation requirements, and cross-framework equivalence assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive test scenarios, user stories, and acceptance criteria from requirements and specifications. Use this skill when planning testing efforts, writing user stories, creating test cases, documenting acceptance criteria, exploring edge cases, designing test coverage, or translating requirements into actionable scenarios. Supports BDD (Given-When-Then), Gherkin syntax, user story format, and test case documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Разбивает Epic или крупное требование на независимые User Stories с acceptance criteria в формате Given-When-Then, проверкой по INVEST и оценкой Story Points (Fibonacci или T-shirt). На выходе — Story Map с предложением по Sprint-планированию. User-invoked only — do NOT auto-trigger. Triggers on /pm-user-stories, "разбей на user stories", "разбить эпик", "story map", "AC", "acceptance criteria", "break down into user stories", "split this epic", "write user stories".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates completed work against defined acceptance criteria. Use after completing a task that has specific success criteria defined in issues, specs, or task descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a behavioral scenario acceptance matrix for comprehensive test coverage planning. Maps user scenarios to acceptance criteria with stable IDs. Use when planning test coverage for a complex feature, before a release or milestone review, or when someone asks what is tested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agile product ownership for backlog management and sprint execution. Covers user story writing, acceptance criteria, sprint planning, and velocity tracking. Use when writing user stories, creating acceptance criteria, planning sprints, estimating story points, breaking down epics, or prioritizing the backlog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate red-phase acceptance test scaffolds using the TDD cycle. Use when the user says "lets write acceptance tests" or "I want to do ATDD"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute structured acceptance checks and record their observed results for later comparison. Use to capture a pre-change baseline or a post-change verification state without treating expected nonzero baseline results as execution failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kerberos delegation, SPN trust edges, S4U abuse, RBCD, constrained or unconstrained delegation, and service-ticket acceptance. Use when the user asks about constrained delegation, unconstrained delegation, RBCD, S4U, SPNs, ticket acceptance, or how a Kerberos trust edge turns into effective privilege under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

議論・議事録・選定された施策を起点に、対象リポジトリの実構造にgroundした「エンジニア向け Story（User Story + Acceptance Criteria）と Spec（技術仕様）」をSubagentで収束生成する。target_repoで対象コードベースを、backlog_db_urlで起票先バックログを選べる汎用スキル。抽象的な打ち手を実装可能な仕様へ絞り込む収束フェーズの実行に使う。

应用从 AI for Everyone 蒸馏出的「统计化验收标准 — 不追求100%准确」方法论。Use when the user needs practical guidance, diagnosis, workflow design, decision support, or an action plan related to statistical-acceptance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write well-structured work items with proper acceptance criteria. Use when: (1) Creating work items, (2) Adding acceptance criteria, (3) User mentions work item, task, WI, or ticket

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate acceptance criteria and feature completion. Use when checking if features pass, validating test results, verifying acceptance criteria, or determining feature completion status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze features from user perspective and write user stories with acceptance criteria. Use when defining requirements, writing user stories, validating scope against project state, prioritizing features by impact, comparing approaches, analyzing user needs, or planning next work. Triggers: "user story", "acceptance criteria", "scope", "prioritize", "compare requirements", "user needs", "what to build next".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write user stories with acceptance criteria. Use when the user says "write user stories", "convert this to stories", "create acceptance criteria", "break this into tickets", "story map", "walking skeleton", "story for this feature", or wants to translate a feature idea into sprint-ready items - even if they don't explicitly say "user stories".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and write QA test artifacts - test cases, test plans, acceptance criteria, API test specs, and PR testability reviews. Use this skill whenever a QA engineer or SDET needs to translate requirements, user stories, or feature specs into structured test documentation. Trigger on phrases like "write test cases", "create a test plan", "define acceptance criteria", "review this PR for testability", "write API test specs", "test coverage for this feature", "what should we test", "how do we test this", or any request to structure what and how to test before execution begins. Also trigger when a developer asks "is this testable?" or a PM asks "what are the edge cases?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates an approved plan against 8 dimensions before Phase 3 begins. Catches incomplete acceptance criteria, missing dependencies, and unresolved risks. Use after Gate 1 approval and before Phase 2 (Test). Produces a validation report with pass/fail per dimension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-to-requirement coverage mapping. Reads plan acceptance criteria and test files, produces a coverage gap report showing which requirements have no tests. Use during Phase 2 (Test) or Phase 4 (Review) to verify test completeness. Named after the Nyquist sampling theorem — sufficient test coverage prevents aliased (missed) requirements. NOT for running tests (see mk:testing); NOT for structural code review (see mk:review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agile product ownership for backlog management and sprint execution. Covers user story writing, acceptance criteria, sprint planning, and velocity tracking. Use when writing user stories, creating acceptance criteria, planning sprints, estimating story points, breaking down epics, or prioritizing the backlog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying a story or ticket implementation against its spec and acceptance criteria - per-AC verdicts with file:line evidence and proving tests, code reuse and design conformance, dead code, stale docs, comment discipline. Finds the spec from an explicit path, the ticket key in the branch name, or plan files - and asks rather than guessing. For defect-hunting code review use dotnet-techne-code-review instead. Keywords: story QA, acceptance criteria, spec conformance, AC coverage, definition of done, dead code check, reuse check, comment check, verify story, QA this branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a wireframe and everything already agreed into a written spec in traditional agile shape — an initiative broken into epics, epics into user stories with acceptance criteria, and themes as the labels that span them — presented as an interactive drill-down tree the user prunes, edits and annotates in the browser, with a plain-markdown spec generated from it. Use when the user wants a spec, an initiative or epic broken into user stories, acceptance criteria, to formalise what a wireframe or mockup does, or to review and edit a spec visually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。