4万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Claude Agent SDK（Python / TypeScript）を使った機能実装の設計をサポートするスキル。 ヒアリング型ワークフローでユーザーの要件を明確化し、 公式ドキュメントに基づいた最適なアーキテクチャと実装パターンを提案する。 Trigger: Agent SDK, claude_agent_sdk, claude-agent-sdk, ClaudeAgentOptions, ClaudeSDKClient, Agent SDKで, エージェントSDK, エージェントを作りたい, agent-sdkを使って, query(), createSdkMcpServer, サブエージェント構成, agent architecture
Single-page SEO audit: content quality under Google's E-E-A-T framework and Helpful Content guidelines, on-page factors, search intent, technical signals and readability. Pulls GSC data for the page, crawls the live HTML, checks metadata, schema, internal linking and depth, and produces a scored report with fixes. Use whenever the user wants to analyze a specific page or URL, not the whole site. Trigger on: "analyze this page", "audit this URL", "how is this page doing", "evaluate my blog post", "check this landing page", "page SEO", "content quality check", "is this page good enough", "review this page's SEO", "what's wrong with this page", "how can I improve this page", "page analysis", "single page audit", "content audit for [URL]", or any request naming a specific URL/page for SEO evaluation. If the user provides a specific URL (not just a domain), this is likely the right skill; use /seo-analysis for full-site audits instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and resources end to end. USE FOR: foundry, azd ai agent, azd provision/deploy, hosted agent scaffold/develop/run/deploy/troubleshoot, prompt agent create, create agent, update agent, add tool to agent, invoke agent, agent.yaml, agent insights, pull agent insights, evaluate agent, batch eval, continuous eval, continuous monitoring, agent CI/CD, optimize prompt, improve prompt, prompt optimizer, optimize agent instructions, Agent Optimizer scaffold, dataset curation from traces, deploy model, model fine-tuning (SFT/DPO/RFT), Foundry project, RBAC, role assignment, permissions, quota, capacity, region, deployment failure, AI Services, create Foundry resource, knowledge index, customize deployment, onboard, availability, training-data, grader, distillation, large file upload. DO NOT USE FOR: Azure Functions, App Service, general Azure deploy (use azure-deploy), general Azure prep (use azure-prepare).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and resources end to end. USE FOR: foundry, azd ai agent, azd provision/deploy, hosted agent scaffold/develop/run/deploy/troubleshoot, prompt agent create, create agent, update agent, add tool to agent, invoke agent, agent.yaml, agent insights, pull agent insights, evaluate agent, batch eval, continuous eval, continuous monitoring, agent CI/CD, optimize prompt, improve prompt, prompt optimizer, optimize agent instructions, Agent Optimizer scaffold, dataset curation from traces, deploy model, model fine-tuning (SFT/DPO/RFT), Foundry project, RBAC, role assignment, permissions, quota, capacity, region, deployment failure, AI Services, create Foundry resource, knowledge index, customize deployment, onboard, availability, training-data, grader, distillation, large file upload. DO NOT USE FOR: Azure Functions, App Service, general Azure deploy (use azure-deploy), general Azure prep (use azure-prepare).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a webinar or live event registration page as a self-contained HTML file with countdown timer, speaker bio, agenda, and registration form. Triggers on: "build a webinar registration page", "create a webinar sign-up page", "event registration landing page", "live training registration page", "workshop sign-up page", "create a webinar page", "build an event page", "free webinar landing page", "live demo registration page", "online event page", "create a registration page for my webinar", "build a training event page".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-framework enhancement overlay for choosing a multi-agent topology BEFORE writing any agent. A binary-question rubric — is single-agent + tools enough? do agents need to know about each other? does the output need one voice? — maps the answer to single-agent / supervisor / swarm / sequential / hierarchical. Activates when a coder agent is tempted to "split the work into roles" or reaches for a multi-agent framework. Encodes the *selection rubric* that the per-framework skills assume but never surface. Search keywords: when to use multi-agent, single vs multi agent, do I need multiple agents, supervisor vs swarm, multi-agent vs single agent, agent team design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enhancement overlay for multi-agent / tool-using coder agents. Encodes the per-agent tool- scoping discipline that role-based frameworks (CrewAI, LangChain) document only as a passing best-practice: which agent gets which tool, and why blanket-sharing every tool to every agent is a correctness and blast-radius risk. Activates when an agent system has tools AND there is more than one agent (or one agent holding many tools). Treat a tool as a capability grant; scope by least-privilege. ENHANCE overlay — read alongside [[crewai]], [[agentsop-http-tool-wrapping]], [[agentsop-llm-tool-idempotency]]. Search keywords: which tools per agent, least-privilege agent, agent tool access, tool permissions, limit agent tools, scope tools to roles.overlay_type: enhancement
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs Amazon-compliant main product images and the 7 secondary image types (Infographic / Multi-angle / Detail Shot / Lifestyle / Variants / What's in Box / Size Reference) — with platform-mandatory main-image rules, conversion-rate-tuned secondary types per product category, and multi-image consistency anchored to the main image URL. Use when the user says "Amazon main image", "亚马逊主图", "product main image", "white background product image", "Amazon listing image", "亚马逊副图", "secondary images", "product carousel images", or any request for the 1:1 product image suite that lives on the Amazon detail page carousel. For A+ Content / detail-page modules (21:9 Hero Banner and 3:2 module layouts), see the `product-shots-detail-page` skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Branch skill for building and improving agents. Use when creating new agents, adapting marketplace agents, validating agent structure, writing system prompts, or improving existing agents. Triggers: 'create agent', 'improve agent', 'validate agent', 'fix agent', 'agent frontmatter', 'system prompt', 'adapt agent', 'customize agent', 'agent examples', 'agent tools'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when architecting new Claude Code agents following Anthropic best practices. Guides through YAML frontmatter creation, agent structure definition, role boundaries, and validation. Critical for creating minimal agent files (~150 lines) with proper skill invocations. Examples: <example>Context: User wants to create a new agent for security auditing user: "Create a security-auditor agent" assistant: "I'll use the agent-creator skill to build this agent following Anthropic best practices" <commentary>New agent creation requires the agent-creator skill to ensure proper structure and YAML frontmatter.</commentary></example> <example>Context: Existing agent file is too verbose and needs refactoring user: "The architect agent is 2000 lines, refactor it to minimal structure" assistant: "I'll use the agent-creator skill to refactor this into a minimal ~150 line agent with a separate skill file" <commentary>Agent refactoring requires the agent-creator skill to separate identity from technical procedures.</commentary></example>
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build custom AI agents in Claude Code from a user's problem statement. This skill analyzes the user's use case, asks smart clarifying questions, researches the internet for similar agents (GitHub repos, blogs, Claude Code community patterns), and then architects and builds production-ready Claude Code agents — including subagents, skills, hooks, slash commands, MCP integrations, and CLAUDE.md configuration. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create an agent, build an automation workflow, set up a Claude Code subagent, design a multi-agent system, or says things like 'build me an agent for...', 'automate this with Claude Code', 'I want a subagent that...', 'help me create a workflow', 'set up an agent pipeline', or any variation of wanting Claude Code to do something specialized. Also trigger when the user mentions agent architecture, agent SDK, agentic workflows, or task delegation in Claude Code — even if they don't use the word 'agent' explicitly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized agentic and context engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when designing AI agents — system prompts, tool definitions, context window architectures, failure mode planning, multi-agent coordination, agent evaluation. Trigger on: "design an agent," "build a system prompt for an agent," "architect an agent's context," "design tool definitions," "agent system prompt," "context window architecture," "tool interface design," "evaluate agent behavior," "multi-agent coordination," "context engineering for agents," "ACI design." Provides 12 tested approaches for agent architecture (designing agents, not using them). Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring individual non-agent prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available). Do NOT use for general software architecture that hosts agents (use standard technical reasoning for that).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designing or reviewing Agentforce actions: Flow actions, Apex invocable actions, prompt-template actions, action naming, input and output contracts, confirmation requirements, and safe error behavior. Triggers: 'agent actions', 'build an agent that can look up an order', 'make the agent able to check order status', 'give the agent a capability', 'agent that can retrieve a record', 'flow action for agent', 'agent invocable action', 'action schema design'. NOT for writing the Apex class itself — use agentforce/custom-agent-actions-apex. NOT for the reason_code error envelope that stops an agent retry loop — use agentforce/agent-action-error-handling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing how an Agentforce agent transfers the conversation to a human agent (Omni-Channel), to another bot/agent, or to an alternate workflow — including context package, deflection, escalation triggers, and user messaging. Triggers: 'agent to human handoff', 'agentforce escalate to omni channel', 'agent to agent handoff', 'transfer conversation with context', 'agent deflection fallback'. NOT for topic scope and selector design — use agentforce/agent-topic-design. NOT for the overall Einstein Bot plus Agentforce estate topology — use architect/conversational-ai-architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when designing, auditing, or troubleshooting behavioral boundaries for Agentforce agents — including topic (now subagent) Scope fields, agent-level system instructions, topic/action filters, the Escalation topic, restricted topics, and Instruction Adherence monitoring. Trigger keywords: agent guardrails, agent out of scope, restrict agent behavior, topic scope, subagent scope, agent fallback, Escalation topic, abuse prevention, action filters. NOT for Trust Layer content filtering (Einstein Trust Layer is a separate product concern), NOT for general topic routing design (use agentforce/agent-topic-design), NOT for prompt template construction (use agentforce/prompt-builder-templates).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude Code（.claude）と Codex（.codex / .agents / AGENTS.md）に分裂したエージェント設定を、 実ファイル1つ + symlink と双方向変換で単一化・同期するスキル。 実ファイルをどちら側に置くか（symlink の向き）は共通設定 source で選べる。 プロジェクト単位の導入ウィザード、既に分裂しているリポジトリを危険度の低い順に解決する手順、 片方しか無いリポジトリへもう片方を生成する scaffold、書き換え前のバックアップと復元、常駐の管理を含む。 「エージェント設定を同期して」「.codex と .claude がずれている」「Codex でも同じスキルを使いたい」 「AGENTS.md と CLAUDE.md を一本化したい」「MCP を Codex でも使えるようにして」 「サブエージェントを Codex 側にも作って」「設定の分裂を解消して」「元に戻して」 「agents-sync」「同期デーモン」などと言われたら使う。 Keywords: agents-sync, エージェント設定同期, .claude, .codex, .agents, AGENTS.md, symlink 統合, symlink の向き, 実ファイルを置く側, 双方向同期, scaffold, 分裂解消, MCP 同期, hooks 同期, サブエージェント同期, バックアップ, 復元, fswatch, launchd, 常駐デーモン
Conversation patterns and interaction protocols for multi-agent systems. Covers request/response, pub/sub, blackboard, delegation chains, debate, critique, consensus, fan-out/fan-in, supervisor-worker, and peer negotiation. Deep analysis of AutoGen conversation patterns, CrewAI delegation, LangGraph state passing, and FIPA-ACL performatives. Teaches how to design what agents say to each other and in what order. Activate on: "agent conversation", "agent protocol", "multi-agent debate", "agent delegation", "supervisor worker pattern", "agent voting", "consensus protocol", "fan-out fan-in", "agent negotiation", "blackboard pattern", "agent dialogue", "conversation topology", "agent handoff". NOT for: wire format or serialization (use agent-interchange-formats), orchestration infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026), single agent behavior (use agentic-patterns).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Surfaces user-facing custom messages from a JetFormBuilder custom Form Action — both the idiomatic path (register message types via 'jet-form-builder/form-messages/register' so they appear in the form's Messages panel and can be overridden globally per form) and the action-local path (custom message fields inside the action editor, dispatched via Action_Exception for errors or via context + 'jet-form-builder/form-handler/after-send' + Messages_Manager::dynamic_success() for success messages). Use when a custom JFB action needs configurable messages for cases like "already subscribed", "duplicate row skipped", "API rate limited", or per-action success copy. Triggers on mentions of "JFB messages", "Action_Exception", "Base_Action_Messages", "jet-form-builder/form-messages/register", "_jf_messages", "dynamic_success", "add_context_once" with a message, "after-send" hook, or "custom action message".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
コミット直前に変更ファイルを整形し、既存の型チェックとテストを実行する仕組みを設定します。Huskyとlint-stagedの導入から設定・動作確認まで扱うスキルです。
Plan, run, and measure an adversary engagement operation using the MITRE Engage framework so that deployed deception is driven by strategy instead of deployed ad hoc. Covers the Engage Matrix (Prepare, Expose, Affect, Elicit, Understand), the 10-Step Operational Process, mapping engagement Activities to the ATT&CK techniques they expose, and defining measurable Goals and Operational Objectives. Use when a team has honeypots, honeytokens, or canary tokens but no coordinating strategy, when leadership asks "should we engage attackers and how", when building a deception/denial program, when writing an adversary engagement operation plan, or when deciding which deception Activities to deploy against a specific threat actor. Keywords: MITRE Engage, adversary engagement, cyber deception strategy, denial and deception, Engage Matrix, EAC, EGO, Expose Affect Elicit, deception program, honeypot strategy, engagement operation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user wants to "publish an agent", "publish my ADK agent", "register an agent with Gemini", "publish to Gemini" (formerly Gemini Enterprise), or needs guidance on the agents-cli publish gemini command. Also use when the user wants to "manage agents in Agent Registry", "list/update/delete registered agents", or "register an MCP server". Covers ADK vs A2A registration modes, programmatic and interactive usage, flag reference, auto-detection from deployment metadata, Agent Registry fleet management, and troubleshooting. Part of the agents-cli skills suite. Do NOT use for deployment (use google-agents-cli-deploy).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a single-product deep-dive showcase page as a self-contained HTML file. Triggers on: "build a product showcase page", "deep dive landing page for [product]", "create a product spotlight page", "product feature page", "single product page", "detailed page about [product]", "build a page showing everything about [product]", "create a long-form product page", "build a sales page for [product]", "product deep dive page", "make a feature breakdown page for [product]".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
World-class landing page expertise combining conversion rate optimization science, persuasive design psychology, and the craft of pages that turn visitors into customers. Landing pages are where marketing meets reality—the moment of truth where visitors decide. Great landing pages aren't just pretty—they're conversion machines. The best landing page designers understand that every element must earn its place, that friction is the enemy, and that the goal isn't to impress—it's to convert. Speed, clarity, and persuasion in perfect balance. Use when "landing page, conversion page, lead capture, signup page, pricing page, hero section, above the fold, CTA design, conversion rate, page optimization, lead gen page, squeeze page, sales page, landing-pages, conversion, CRO, design, optimization, lead-generation, signups, forms" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
广告外包公司绩效管理 (广告外包公司绩效管理 (Ad Agency / Marketing-Outsourcing Firm Performance Management) — 广告/营销外包公司(乙方 agency:创意热店/4A/本土广告公司/传媒公司/数字营销代理/MCN/设计工作室/内容外包)的『怎么做绩效管理』职业认知操作系统,面向老板/合伙人、运营总监(COO)、HR/HRBP、项目总监、team lead、以及想搭绩效体系的从业者。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 绩效管理的核心世界观分歧: **创意/知识工作『不可量化』 vs 『必须可考核』(创意难归因、难标准化,硬套 KPI 杀创意;但不考核养懒人——这是本行绩效的元矛盾) ⇄ 结果导向(KPI/业绩/回款) vs 过程导向(OKR/能力/成长) ⇄ 个人绩效 vs 团队协作(广告是集体产物,创意-AE-媒介-设计协作,难拆到个人) ⇄ 强激励(提成制:多劳多得但抢单/短视/不协作/吃老客户) vs 稳定(固定+奖金:公平但大锅饭) ⇄ 规模/流水 vs 利润/人效(低价接单冲规模 vs 保毛利)**; (b) 绩效体系设计 — KPI(关键指标法)/OKR(目标与关键成果)/BSC(平衡计分卡)/360 环评/MBO(目标管理)/KSF(关键成功因子)/积分制/计件提成;考核周期(月/季/年+项目制);绩效面谈、绩效改进 PIP、强制分布(271/活力曲线)争议、绩效结果应用(调薪/晋升/淘汰/奖金); (c) 分岗位绩效(本行难点,各岗量化差异极大) — 创意(文案/美术/创意总监:作品质量、获奖、比稿命中率——最难量化)、AE/客户执行(客户满意度、续约、回款、增购、客诉)、媒介/投放(可量化:ROI/ROAS/CPM/转化——最易量化)、策略/策划(方案通过率、洞察)、设计(产能/返稿率/品质)、项目管理(交付准时率、利润率)、销售/BD(新签、回款、毛利); (d) 项目与客户维度绩效(agency 特有,专业服务公司逻辑) — 项目利润率(收入-人力成本-外部成本)、工时制与人效(billability 可计费工时率/utilization 利用率/realization 实现率,借鉴咨询律所)、人均产值/人均毛利、客户续约率与 LTV、客户集中度风险、比稿投入产出、改稿次数失控; (e) 激励与分配机制 — 提成制(按签单/毛利/回款抽成)、项目奖金分成(如何在创意-AE-媒介间分)、年终奖包、合伙人制/事业合伙人/工作室 studio 制/阿米巴、股权期权、创意人才的非物质激励(署名/获奖/成长); (f) 人效、成本与文化 — 人效比(人力成本占收入比,业内估计通常 40-55%,非普适)、毛利率、加班/血汗工厂文化批判(乙方 996/改稿到凌晨)、人才流失率与保留、招聘与培养、组织架构(客户组 vs 职能组 vs 项目制矩阵); (g) 外包/乙方特有张力对绩效的侵蚀 — 甲乙方权力不对等(甲方压价、无限改稿、比稿白嫖创意、账期长垫款重回款难)、低价内卷与红海、项目制不确定性(旺淡季、大客户依赖)、创意工时不可控如何计入绩效、外包 vs 自建团队的成本对比; (h) 争议/批判 — KPI 量化派 vs 创意不可考核派、提成制养蛊 vs 团队协作、强制分布/末位淘汰是否适合小 agency、工时制(billable hours)被咨询律所验证但绑架员工健康、『向甲方看齐做 OKR』水土不服、绩效主义扼杀创意(索尼绩效主义之殇式批判)、乙方绩效本质是『用考核对冲甲方不确定性』的转嫁; (i) 流派/思想谱系 — 专业服务公司管理派(David Maister《Managing the Professional Service Firm》PSF 圣经:leverage 杠杆/utilization 利用率/billing;借鉴咨询律所会计所) vs agency 专家经营派(David C. Baker《The Business of Expertise》+2Bobs podcast、Blair Enns《Win Without Pitching》《Pricing Creativity》定位与定价) vs OKR/目标管理派(John Doerr《Measure What Matters》、Google/Intel OKR、字节/飞书 OKR 本土化) vs 中式绩效工具派(KSF 薪酬全绩效/积分制/阿米巴/华为绩效体系被广告公司借用) vs 本土 4A/广告公司实战派(省广/蓝色光标/华扬联众/利欧 等上市广告公司管理 + 创意热店工作室制)。不含: 广告投放/信息流/SEM 的技术操作本身、甲方市场部/品牌方内部绩效、通用 HR 招聘薪酬全流程(仅取与绩效相关部分)、纯财务会计做账、MCN 达人孵化运营细节。) Master OS — automated mastery of 广告外包公司绩效管理 (Ad Agency / Marketing-Outsourcing Firm Performance Management) — 广告/营销外包公司(乙方 agency:创意热店/4A/本土广告公司/传媒公司/数字营销代理/MCN/设计工作室/内容外包)的『怎么做绩效管理』职业认知操作系统,面向老板/合伙人、运营总监(COO)、HR/HRBP、项目总监、team lead、以及想搭绩效体系的从业者。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 绩效管理的核心世界观分歧: **创意/知识工作『不可量化』 vs 『必须可考核』(创意难归因、难标准化,硬套 KPI 杀创意;但不考核养懒人——这是本行绩效的元矛盾) ⇄ 结果导向(KPI/业绩/回款) vs 过程导向(OKR/能力/成长) ⇄ 个人绩效 vs 团队协作(广告是集体产物,创意-AE-媒介-设计协作,难拆到个人) ⇄ 强激励(提成制:多劳多得但抢单/短视/不协作/吃老客户) vs 稳定(固定+奖金:公平但大锅饭) ⇄ 规模/流水 vs 利润/人效(低价接单冲规模 vs 保毛利)**; (b) 绩效体系设计 — KPI(关键指标法)/OKR(目标与关键成果)/BSC(平衡计分卡)/360 环评/MBO(目标管理)/KSF(关键成功因子)/积分制/计件提成;考核周期(月/季/年+项目制);绩效面谈、绩效改进 PIP、强制分布(271/活力曲线)争议、绩效结果应用(调薪/晋升/淘汰/奖金); (c) 分岗位绩效(本行难点,各岗量化差异极大) — 创意(文案/美术/创意总监:作品质量、获奖、比稿命中率——最难量化)、AE/客户执行(客户满意度、续约、回款、增购、客诉)、媒介/投放(可量化:ROI/ROAS/CPM/转化——最易量化)、策略/策划(方案通过率、洞察)、设计(产能/返稿率/品质)、项目管理(交付准时率、利润率)、销售/BD(新签、回款、毛利); (d) 项目与客户维度绩效(agency 特有,专业服务公司逻辑) — 项目利润率(收入-人力成本-外部成本)、工时制与人效(billability 可计费工时率/utilization 利用率/realization 实现率,借鉴咨询律所)、人均产值/人均毛利、客户续约率与 LTV、客户集中度风险、比稿投入产出、改稿次数失控; (e) 激励与分配机制 — 提成制(按签单/毛利/回款抽成)、项目奖金分成(如何在创意-AE-媒介间分)、年终奖包、合伙人制/事业合伙人/工作室 studio 制/阿米巴、股权期权、创意人才的非物质激励(署名/获奖/成长); (f) 人效、成本与文化 — 人效比(人力成本占收入比,业内估计通常 40-55%,非普适)、毛利率、加班/血汗工厂文化批判(乙方 996/改稿到凌晨)、人才流失率与保留、招聘与培养、组织架构(客户组 vs 职能组 vs 项目制矩阵); (g) 外包/乙方特有张力对绩效的侵蚀 — 甲乙方权力不对等(甲方压价、无限改稿、比稿白嫖创意、账期长垫款重回款难)、低价内卷与红海、项目制不确定性(旺淡季、大客户依赖)、创意工时不可控如何计入绩效、外包 vs 自建团队的成本对比; (h) 争议/批判 — KPI 量化派 vs 创意不可考核派、提成制养蛊 vs 团队协作、强制分布/末位淘汰是否适合小 agency、工时制(billable hours)被咨询律所验证但绑架员工健康、『向甲方看齐做 OKR』水土不服、绩效主义扼杀创意(索尼绩效主义之殇式批判)、乙方绩效本质是『用考核对冲甲方不确定性』的转嫁; (i) 流派/思想谱系 — 专业服务公司管理派(David Maister《Managing the Professional Service Firm》PSF 圣经:leverage 杠杆/utilization 利用率/billing;借鉴咨询律所会计所) vs agency 专家经营派(David C. Baker《The Business of Expertise》+2Bobs podcast、Blair Enns《Win Without Pitching》《Pricing Creativity》定位与定价) vs OKR/目标管理派(John Doerr《Measure What Matters》、Google/Intel OKR、字节/飞书 OKR 本土化) vs 中式绩效工具派(KSF 薪酬全绩效/积分制/阿米巴/华为绩效体系被广告公司借用) vs 本土 4A/广告公司实战派(省广/蓝色光标/华扬联众/利欧 等上市广告公司管理 +
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。