707 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Evaluates claims trading market with trading levels, holder identification, and blocking position analysis. Use when analyzing claims markets, tracking distressed debt trading, or evaluating ad hoc group dynamics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or customizing industry-specific guided processes in Salesforce Industries clouds: insurance claims lifecycle (FNOL through closure), telecom order management decomposition, and utility service request workflows. Trigger keywords: FNOL process design, claims OmniScript customization, Industries order decomposition workflow, utility service order design, insurance claim lifecycle stages, telecom commercial-to-technical order flow. NOT for the Industries object model — use architect/industries-data-model. NOT for Insurance Cloud licensing and policy architecture — use architect/insurance-cloud-architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep analysis of competitor patent claims: element decomposition, scope interpretation, equivalents prediction, prosecution history estoppel analysis. Automatically converts PDF/DOCX/DOC patent files to structured Markdown via patent-pdf-to-md skill before analysis. Invoke when user asks to analyze/parse competitor patent claims, decompose claim elements, assess claim scope, or perform 权利要求解析/要素分解/保护范围解读. 竞品专利权利要求深度解析：要素分解、保护范围解读、等同范围预判、审查历史限制分析。自动调用patent-pdf-to-md技能将PDF/DOCX/DOC专利文件转换为结构化Markdown后再进行分析。当用户要求解析竞品专利权利要求、要素分解、保护范围时触发。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate trained models and analytical claims against their intended decision, independent evidence, and human-reviewed ground truth. Use when reviewing model performance, analysis conclusions, launch claims, or evaluation reports; use failure diagnosis instead when the main task is locating a known defect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces and audits externally published marketing copy where factual claims must survive scrutiny — landing pages, product pages, launch emails, one-pagers, search/social metadata. Every statistic, competitor comparison, capability description, and proof point is traced to a fetched source or the project's own documents, labeled, and adversarially verified before it ships. Use when writing or rewriting high-stakes marketing copy; when copy must pass legal, compliance, brand, or claims review; when the audience is skeptical technical or executive buyers; when the company has little or no customer proof yet (pre-launch, zero customers); or when auditing existing copy for unsupported claims, invented capabilities, unverified statistics, or AI-slop language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
公開前の文章やコードを二つの独立したエージェントが同じ基準で審査し、両方の合格まで修正と再審査を繰り返し、上限を超えたら人へ判断を引き継ぐスキル。
機械学習・AIの研究論文を、関連文献の調査から実験設計、結果分析、執筆、投稿準備まで支援します。引用の検証や査読への対応も扱います。
Join and operate a signed cross-host agentbbs federation, and coordinate work claims across nodes. Use when: connecting ruflo agents across machines, sharing status/tasks/results between hosts, propagating work claims across a swarm, or standing up a federation hub. Skip when: single-host local work with no other nodes to coordinate with.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fact-checks OpenSpec user documentation with a fresh-context subagent that re-runs commands and checks claims against source. Manually triggered; not part of the drafting loop. Use when the user asks to verify, fact-check, or accuracy-check a docs page, section, or set of changed claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for JWT, JWS, and JWE validation paths, header parsing, key selection, claim acceptance, audience and issuer checks, role derivation, and token-to-identity confusion bugs. Use when the user asks to inspect JWT headers or claims, key lookup, `kid` handling, `alg` confusion, audience or issuer validation, role claims, or explain how a token becomes accepted identity or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute any of 240+ specialized prompt patterns natively across Extraction, Summarization, Analysis, Creation, Improvement, Security, Rating. Common: extract_wisdom, create_threat_model, analyze_claims, improve_writing, review_code, mermaid, youtube_summary. CLI used only for YouTube transcript (-y) and URL fallback (-u). Two workflows: ExecutePattern, UpdatePatterns. USE WHEN fabric, fabric pattern, run fabric, update patterns, threat model, analyze claims, improve writing, review code, mermaid, STRIDE, sigma rules. NOT FOR multi-agent investigation (Research) or content-adaptive extraction (ExtractWisdom).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. A secondary Codex agent evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. Codex MCP evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Claude Ads contracts, scoring inputs, run bundles, capabilities, source freshness, safety, installation, uninstall, or release readiness. Use for ads validate, ads status, ads next, stale claims with missing tool access, maturity checks, ownership-manifest uninstall, preserving unrelated ads-* skills, checksum verification, preflight, QA, or release audits. Missing access must demote stale evidence for the run and block dependent release-current claims before recovery guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review paper quality", "check paper completeness", "validate paper structure", "self-review before submission", "audit claims", "check overclaiming", "verify whether results support claims", or mentions systematic paper quality checking. Provides comprehensive quality assurance checklist for academic papers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to verify CLAIM-LEVEL grounding of a documentation page (or set of pages) against the source code. Activate when you have specific pages to check for factual accuracy -- not when sweeping a whole corpus (use docs-corpus-audit for that) and not when triaging a PR diff (use docs-sync for that). Trigger nouns: "is this doc accurate", "verify the page against the code", "fact-check this section", "any claims that drifted from source", "fact-checking", "grounding audit", "drift hunt", "claim verification". Returns per-claim verdicts (GROUNDED | PARTIAL | CONTRADICTED | UNSUPPORTED) with file:line evidence citations. Catches paragraph-level inaccuracies that page-level audit averages over -- e.g. a paragraph with 5 claims where 4 are grounded and 1 is fabricated. Does NOT modify files (returns advisory only); does NOT re-architect the docs; does NOT triage PRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research competitor products, launch history, and acquisition evidence from public sources or supplied materials. Use when evaluating growth claims, comparing competitors, or choosing growth experiments. Produces a cited brief that separates observations, attributed claims, estimates, and hypotheses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query the bundled research knowledge graph for methodology guidance. Routes questions through a 3-tier knowledge base — WHY (research claims), HOW (guidance docs), WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE (domain examples) — plus structured reference documents. Returns research-backed answers grounded in specific claims with practical application to the user's system. Triggers on "/ask", "/ask [question]", "why does my system...", "how should I...".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Microsoft Entra Authentication Events SDK for .NET. Azure Functions triggers for custom authentication extensions. Use for token enrichment, custom claims, attribute collection, and OTP customization in Entra ID. Triggers: "Authentication Events", "WebJobsAuthenticationEventsTrigger", "OnTokenIssuanceStart", "OnAttributeCollectionStart", "custom claims", "token enrichment", "Entra custom extension", "authentication extension".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "build our pitch deck narrative", "write a fundraising story", or "structure the sales pitch narrative"; derives from the narrative canon a company pitch/deck narrative — problem → the undeniable shift → product-as-hero → proof → the ask — as a slide-beat outline (one narrative beat per slide, with the claim ID each proof beat rests on), for both a sales pitch and a fundraising deck. Every proof beat is labeled Measured / User-provided / '[needs source]' and unverified ones route to the claims candidates. Not for the launch-window battle cards and talk track — use sales-enablement-kit; not for the durable message hierarchy or the arc itself — use message-system-architect / strategic-narrative-designer; not for finished deck visual design — out of scope; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 路演叙事/融资故事/销售 pitch/幻灯节拍
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "plan launch pricing", "design pricing tiers / packaging", or "set up a launch discount / early-bird offer"; produces a launch pricing and packaging plan — tier structure and naming, a value-to-price map aligned to the message house, a launch-offer ladder with a true deadline reason, beta / early-adopter pricing with a post-launch graduation path, and guarantee / refund terms — with every price claim and offer term submitted to memory/events/claims.ndjson. Not for the canonical offer / claim record — use offer-claims-registry; not for paid-newsletter subscription economics — use newsletter-monetization-planner; not for ad bidding — use bid-strategy-planner. 发布定价/梯度打包/早鸟优惠/保证设计
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "measure how our narrative is landing", "track echo rate against our canon lexicon", or "check how AI answer engines describe our brand"; produces a resonance report — echo rate (overlap of market language with the narrative-registry canon lexicon, method declared), AI-answer perception via tavily.py --answer (proxy-labeled), share-of-voice on a locked competitor panel (reusing share-of-voice-tracker), and resonance signals from bluesky.py / gdelt.py / pageviews.py — every number labeled Measured / proxy / User-provided, feeding the TALE E dimension and the upstream of the E1 evidence-integrity veto. Not for rebuilding share-of-voice machinery — use share-of-voice-tracker; not for own-site GA4/GSC analytics — use performance-monitor; not for scoring TALE profile result — use narrative-quality-auditor; not for adjudicating claims — use offer-claims-registry. 回声率/AI回答感知/份额之声/共鸣信号
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。