Algorithmic philosophies are computational aesthetic movements that are then expressed through code. Output .md files (philosophy), .html files (interactive viewer), and .js files (generative algorithms).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
93 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Algorithmic philosophies are computational aesthetic movements that are then expressed through code. Output .md files (philosophy), .html files (interactive viewer), and .js files (generative algorithms).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Algorithmic philosophies are computational aesthetic movements that are then expressed through code. Output .md files (philosophy), .html files (interactive viewer), and .js files (generative algorithms).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Algorithmic philosophies are computational aesthetic movements that are then expressed through code. Output .md files (philosophy), .html files (interactive viewer), and .js files (generative algorithms).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Algorithmic philosophies are computational aesthetic movements that are then expressed through code. Output .md files (philosophy), .html files (interactive viewer), and .js files (generative algorithms).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Algorithmic philosophies are computational aesthetic movements that are then expressed through code. Output .md files (philosophy), .html files (interactive viewer), and .js files (generative algorithms).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create generative art using p5.js with seeded randomness so every render is reproducible. Useful for procedural posters, motion-style stills, and artistic frame studies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Train reasoning and verifiable-task behavior with GRPO and reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR). Use when task success is algorithmically checkable (math, code, tool calls, structured output), when designing GRPO reward functions, or when a GRPO run diverges or reward-hacks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hummingbot trading bot framework - automated trading strategies, market making, arbitrage, connectors for crypto exchanges. Use when working with algorithmic trading, crypto trading bots, or exchange integrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cryptofeed - Real-time cryptocurrency market data feeds from 40+ exchanges. WebSocket streaming, normalized data, order books, trades, tickers. Python library for algorithmic trading and market data analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced API exploitation methodology focused on business logic abuse and sophisticated attack patterns that bypass traditional security controls. Covers business logic bypass through API call chaining and workflow manipulation. Addresses GraphQL-specific attacks including batching for credential brute-force, query depth exploitation, and introspection abuse. Includes pagination exploitation for data exfiltration, webhook hijacking for SSRF and data interception, and resource exhaustion through algorithmic complexity attacks. Covers race conditions in API transactions using parallel request techniques. Provides comprehensive JWT manipulation including algorithm confusion, kid injection, jku/x5u abuse, and claim tampering. Details API key leakage detection across source repositories, client-side code, and error messages. Covers undocumented endpoint discovery through predictable naming, debug routes, and source map analysis. Tooling includes Arjun, ParamSpider, jwt_tool, and GraphQL Voyager. Designed for authorized penetration testers targeting business logic layers that automated scanners miss.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
English LaTeX academic paper assistant for existing `.tex` projects. Use this skill whenever the user wants to compile, lint, audit, or improve an English LaTeX conference or journal paper such as IEEE, ACM, Springer, NeurIPS, or ICML submissions. Trigger even when the user only mentions one paper issue, such as bibliography errors, grammar cleanup, sentence splitting, logic review, expression polishing, translation, title optimization, figure checks, pseudocode review, algorithm block cleanup, de-AI editing, experiment-section review, table structure validation, three-line table generation, abstract structure diagnosis, or journal adaptation. Also trigger for "proofread my paper", "fix my LaTeX", "prepare for submission", "check my manuscript", "improve my writing", "three-line table", "booktabs", "check abstract", "reformat for another journal", "换投", `algorithm2e`, `algorithmicx`, `algpseudocodex`, `Require/Ensure`, or "Algorithm 1" when the user has a .tex file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Typst academic paper assistant for existing `.typ` paper projects in English or Chinese. Use this skill whenever the user wants to compile, audit, or improve a Typst paper, including format checks, bibliography validation for BibTeX or Hayagriva, grammar/sentence/logic review, expression polishing, translation, title optimization, pseudocode review, algorithm block cleanup, de-AI editing, experiment-section review, table structure validation, three-line table generation, abstract structure diagnosis, or journal adaptation. Trigger even when the user only mentions one Typst file, one bibliography issue, one pseudocode block, one section rewrite, "three-line table", "check abstract", or "reformat for another journal". Also trigger when the user mentions ".typ files", "typst compile error", "typst export", "typst bibliography", `algorithm-figure`, `lovelace`, or `algorithmic` even without saying the word "Typst" explicitly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates your campaign and ad set structure against your actual goals and budget. Flags over-segmentation that fragments your data, under-segmentation that hides performance differences, budget allocation issues, and consolidation opportunities that would improve algorithmic delivery and your ability to optimize. Platform: Google and Meta.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with a risk tier score, pre-deployment checklist, and prioritised mitigations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a software codebase for algorithmic complexity and performance hotspots, then propose or implement safe optimizations without breaking behavior. Use when Codex is asked to scan many files, find inefficient loops, nested iteration, repeated scans, costly rendering/recomputation, N+1 queries, avoidable O(n^2) or O(n) operations, or reduce complexity such as O(n^2) to O(n log n) / O(n), while preserving tests, APIs, outputs, and maintainability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Algorithmic and generative art with Canvas 2D - particles, flow fields, noise, fractals, L-systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hummingbot trading bot framework - automated trading strategies, market making, arbitrage, connectors for crypto exchanges. Use when working with algorithmic trading, crypto trading bots, or exchange integrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cryptofeed - Real-time cryptocurrency market data feeds from 40+ exchanges. WebSocket streaming, normalized data, order books, trades, tickers. Python library for algorithmic trading and market data analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the security slice). Use when the user mentions 'AI risk,' 'AI governance,' 'NIST AI RMF,' 'AI compliance,' 'ML governance,' 'model risk management,' 'AI fairness,' 'AI bias,' 'algorithmic accountability,' 'AI Bill of Rights,' 'EU AI Act,' 'AI transparency,' 'model card,' 'AI red team,' 'AI safety,' 'responsible AI,' 'model drift,' 'concept drift,' 'AI monitoring,' 'AI incident,' or needs to assess or govern an AI / ML system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies math-heavy code for algorithmic correctness and numerical stability. Use when reviewing scientific algorithms, ML models, or numerical code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Addresses healthcare AI privacy at the intersection of HIPAA and the EU AI Act for clinical decision support systems. Covers training data PHI handling, model transparency and explainability, patient rights in algorithmic decisions, FDA/OCR regulatory coordination, and bias monitoring. Keywords: healthcare AI, HIPAA, AI Act, clinical decision support, PHI training data, model transparency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning, principles, and frameworks of Jürgen Schmidhuber (LSTM co-inventor and deep learning pioneer). Reach for this skill whenever tackling problems involving sequence learning, artificial curiosity, intrinsic motivation, reinforcement learning architectures, or predicting long-term technological and cosmic evolution. Use this when discussing AGI timelines, the history and attribution of AI breakthroughs, data compression as learning, or when designing autonomous agents that must set their own goals. Trigger this skill for topics like recurrent neural networks, algorithmic information theory, open-source AI democratization, and evaluating true existential risks versus media hype.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when reasoning about generative AI, adversarial machine learning, neural network security, algorithmic fairness, or deep learning fundamentals. This skill channels the thinking of Ian Goodfellow, inventor of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). Trigger this skill when the user asks about model robustness, mitigating bias, evaluating AI guardrails, designing generative models, or defending against adversarial attacks. Apply his frameworks of minimax games, adversarial feature learning, and worst-case robustness analysis to shift the user's perspective from average-case optimization to adversarial resilience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract language-agnostic pseudocode from formally verified programs (Isabelle/HOL, Coq) while preserving verified control flow, data dependencies, and algorithmic logic. Use when: (1) Users have verified code and need readable pseudocode, (2) Documenting verified algorithms for broader audiences, (3) Translating verified implementations to other languages, (4) Creating algorithm specifications from verified code, (5) Preserving verification guarantees in pseudocode form, or (6) Abstracting proof-heavy code to essential logic. Maintains semantic faithfulness to verified implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。