「assertions」の検索結果

Set up E2E test harness for CLI applications with process spawning and assertions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs. Evidence before assertions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or unreliable test failures, or when the user mentions flaky tests, test smells, brittle tests, test isolation issues, mock overuse, slow tests, or test maintenance problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies proven testing patterns — Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA), Given-When-Then, Test Data Builders, Object Mother, parameterized tests, fixtures, spies, and test doubles — to help write maintainable, reliable, and readable test suites. Use when the user asks about writing unit tests, integration tests, or end-to-end tests; structuring test cases or test suites; applying TDD or BDD practices; working with mocks, stubs, spies, or fakes; improving test coverage or reducing flakiness; or needs guidance on test organization, naming conventions, or assertions in frameworks like Jest, Vitest, pytest, or similar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run GDScript test suites from the command line with `godot --headless`, using a SceneTree/MainLoop runner script that exits non-zero on failure so CI can gate merges. Use when a Godot project needs unit tests without opening the editor, when wiring a CI job (GitHub Actions or similar) that must fail the build on a failing `.gd` test, or when a `godot --headless` invocation hangs, opens a window, or exits 0 despite failed assertions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures and runs LLM evaluation using Promptfoo framework. Use when setting up prompt testing, creating evaluation configs (promptfooconfig.yaml), writing Python custom assertions, implementing llm-rubric for LLM-as-judge, or managing few-shot examples in prompts. Triggers on keywords like "promptfoo", "eval", "LLM evaluation", "prompt testing", or "model comparison".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up an end-to-end test suite in any repo, following practices that make e2e a reliable per-PR gate: real flows over bypass, layered assertions, a reusable auth/session helper, video+trace evidence, and a compounding suite. Use when a repo has no e2e (or weak e2e) and you want system-level tests — "set up e2e", "add end-to-end tests", "scaffold a test gate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert English-language properties in PROPERTIES.md (produced by the Fizz skill) into Solidity assertions inside the existing fuzz harness, then flip their checkboxes. Trigger on "fizz-convert", "convert properties", "implement properties from PROPERTIES.md", "convert PROPERTIES.md to Solidity".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Import data into the Simulation Data Inspector (SDI) from MAT, CSV, or Excel files, from workspace variables, or from a Simulink simulation. Use when the user wants to view a logged file in SDI, load a bench-test log, or verify what a just-completed `Simulink.sdi.createRun` or `sim(model)` produced. Covers the `'file'`, `'vars'`, and `'namevalue'` sources of `createRun`, the auto-populate behavior after `sim()`, and post-import verification. Not for comparing existing runs (use `Simulink.sdi.compareRuns`); not for streaming data live during a running simulation (use `Simulink.sdi.createRunOrAddToStreamedRun` — a separate API); and not for authoring Gherkin or Simulink Test test cases, assertions, or regression tests (use `testing-simulink-models`). Do not activate on test-authoring or verification prompts even when no test-authoring skill is available — say so and stop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes and migrates Swift Testing framework tests with @Test, @Suite, #expect, #require, confirmation, traits, withKnownIssue, Attachment.record, processExitsWith exit tests and capture lists, Test.cancel, Issue.record warnings/manual failures, XCTest-to-Swift Testing migration, Xcode 27 interoperability modes, XCUITest UI-test boundaries, performance/snapshot boundaries, mocking, async patterns, and test organization. Use when writing tests, converting XCTest assertions such as XCTUnwrap or XCTFail, reviewing advanced Swift Testing API availability, or deciding when to keep XCTest/XCUITest.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes turn-level tests for a LiveKit agent in the user's normal test suite: pytest (Python) or Vitest (Node.js). Use when the user asks to "write tests for my agent", "add a test for this tool", "test the handoff", "pin this bug", "why does my agent test fail", or after building or changing agent behavior that needs regression coverage. Covers the SDK's test session harness, assertions on messages, tool calls and handoffs, LLM judging of a reply against an intent, mocking tools, multi-turn tests, and judging whole conversations with the built-in judges. For interactive poking use debugging-livekit-agents. For grading whole conversations at scale use running-livekit-simulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Terraform provider acceptance test patterns using terraform-plugin-testing with the Plugin Framework. Covers test structure, TestCase/TestStep fields, ConfigStateChecks with custom statecheck.StateCheck implementations, plan checks, CompareValue for cross-step assertions, config helpers, import testing with ImportStateKind, sweepers, and scenario patterns (basic, update, disappears, validation, regression), and ephemeral resource testing with the echoprovider package. Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging provider acceptance tests, including questions about statecheck, plancheck, TestCheckFunc, CheckDestroy, ExpectError, import state verification, ephemeral resources, or how to structure test files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for writing and running Terraform tests. Use when creating test files (.tftest.hcl), writing test scenarios with run blocks, validating infrastructure behavior with assertions, mocking providers and data sources, testing module outputs and resource configurations, or troubleshooting Terraform test syntax and execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces an adversarial attack on a legal argument that survives reply. Runs the opposing-counsel discipline twice: an unrestrained first pass, then the same instrument turned on that pass to cut every point that collapses under challenge - attacks on conceded facts, wrong-forum objections, speculation about documents and motives, gotchas with innocent explanations, overclaims, self-refuting assertions, and padding. The deliverable is one standalone attack containing only what can be defended, capped at five heads, not a discussion of the discarded draft. Use to attack, stress-test, red-team or rebut a submission, brief, motion, witness statement, letter or structured legal reasoning. Triggers on "attack this but only with points that hold", "no cheap shots", "what survives reply", "which points can I actually defend", "give me the version I can file", "double-pass adversarial review". Also use when an earlier adversarial review came back overlong or scattershot. Formal British English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write high-quality JUnit 5 tests with AssertJ assertions. Use when user says "add tests", "write tests", "improve test coverage", or when reviewing/creating test classes for Java code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace `as` in tests, or needs partial test data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates Playwright page objects from an executable test plan, one class per screen with ladder-compliant locators and no assertions, wired into a shared fixture. Use when a web scenario needs a page object that does not exist yet, or when locators drift and the page object must be rebuilt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when making any factual claim about the codebase — existence, absence, or behavior. Converts the claim-verification rule into a systematic action protocol that prevents false assertions from grep-only results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace `as` in tests, or needs partial test data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use dotnet-diagnostics-mcp for MCP-driven .NET CPU, allocation, GC, and test-host profiling. USE FOR: profiling unit tests or investigating runtime bottlenecks. DO NOT USE FOR: writing test assertions, coverage collection, or precise microbenchmark timing. INVOKES: connect the MCP server, select target processes, collect bounded profiles, and attribute hotspots to source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pseudo-mutation analysis ONLY: answer whether tests would catch a bug if production code changed, which meaningful changes would still pass, or which caller-visible mutations existing assertions would miss; verify candidates when requested, then optionally close verified gaps. Includes explicit read-only per-test composition for grading. Activate for behavioral blind spots tied to production behavior. Polyglot. DO NOT USE FOR: suite taxonomy, metadata, or distribution reports (test-tagging); .NET line-vs-branch or Cobertura interpretation, arithmetic, plateaus, project-wide coverage gaps, or coverage-backed test/CRAP priorities (coverage-analysis; use native coverage tooling outside .NET); named-target CRAP (crap-score); new suites (code-testing); assertion/smell audits; or mutation tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。