「assess」の検索結果

Perform a Computer Systems Validation (CSV) assessment following GAMP 5 methodology. Covers user requirements, risk assessment, IQ/OQ/PQ planning, traceability matrix creation, and validation summary reporting. Use when a new computerized system is being introduced in a GxP environment, when an existing validated system is undergoing significant change, when periodic revalidation is required, or when a regulatory inspection demands a validation gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI context assessment — evaluating problem malleability, mapping structural rigidity versus flexibility, analyzing transformation pressure, and estimating capacity to adapt. Use when a complex task feels stuck and it is unclear whether to push through or pivot, before a significant approach change to assess whether the current reasoning structure can support it, when accumulated workarounds suggest the underlying approach may be wrong, or as a periodic structural health check during extended multi-step tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess business impact of a proposed change. Use when the user says "impact assessment", "impact analysis", "what will this change affect", "change impact", "who is impacted", "ripple effects", "downstream impact", "impact mapping", "what breaks if we change this", "readiness for change" - even if they don't explicitly say "impact assessment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a BSA/AML Risk Assessment for U.S. financial institutions per FinCEN, FFIEC, and OCC standards. Evaluates inherent risks (customer, product, geographic, transaction, third-party), control adequacy, and residual risk. Use when preparing annual BSA compliance assessments, post-acquisition integration reviews, or when business changes trigger reassessment under 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI compliance analysis for EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, OECD, financial services regulations (SEC, FCA, FINRA, DORA, MiFID II), and other frameworks. Use when asked to generate a compliance checklist for an AI tool or use case, determine if a risk assessment is required, score an AI tool's risk level, identify where an AI tool or use case could run afoul of regulatory requirements, perform a gap analysis, recommend remediation steps, assess a vendor, draft an acceptable use policy, map training requirements, or review jurisdiction-specific AI rules. Triggers on phrases like "compliance checklist", "risk assessment", "risk score", "does this comply", "EU AI Act", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF", "AI governance", "gap analysis", "vendor assessment", "acceptable use policy", "MNPI", "AI training requirements", or any request to evaluate an AI tool or use case for regulatory compliance or risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ESG(環境・社会・ガバナンス)レポート作成支援スキル。GRI、SASB、TCFD、CDP等の国際基準に準拠した サステナビリティレポート作成、マテリアリティ分析、KPI設定、データ収集・開示をサポート。 Use when creating sustainability reports, conducting materiality assessments, setting ESG targets, or preparing disclosures aligned with GRI, SASB, TCFD, CDP, or CSRD standards. Triggers: "ESG report", "sustainability report", "TCFD", "GRI", "SASB", "CDP", "materiality assessment", "carbon footprint".

コンプライアンス・内部統制支援の専門スキル。J-SOX/SOX対応、リスクコントロールマトリクス（RCM）作成、 内部監査計画策定をサポート。内部統制の整備・運用評価から監査対応まで一貫した支援を提供。 日英両言語のテンプレートを提供し、グローバル企業にも対応。COSO内部統制フレームワーク（2013年版）に準拠。 Use when: creating J-SOX/SOX compliance documentation, building risk control matrices, planning internal audits, or assessing internal control effectiveness. Triggers: "J-SOX", "SOX", "内部統制", "コンプライアンス", "RCM", "リスクコントロールマトリクス", "内部監査", "compliance", "internal control", "internal audit", "risk assessment", "COSO"

Internal audit support skill aligned with IIA (Institute of Internal Auditors) International Standards. Provides risk-based audit planning, audit program development, workpaper documentation, finding development (Condition/Criteria/Cause/Effect), and Corrective Action Request (CAR) tracking. Use when: planning annual/quarterly audits, creating risk assessment matrices, developing audit programs and test procedures, documenting audit workpapers, writing audit findings and reports, tracking corrective actions and follow-ups, preparing for external audits (SOX, ISO). Triggers: "internal audit", "audit plan", "audit program", "audit workpaper", "audit finding", "risk assessment", "CAR tracking", "corrective action", "IIA Standards", "COSO framework", "監査計画", "監査プログラム", "監査調書", "是正措置", "リスク評価".

Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate any project, product, or system's claims against its actual implementation — scoring each claim for truth, identifying architectural gaps, assessing competitive positioning, proposing creative solutions, and producing an actionable roadmap. Load when the user asks to evaluate claims, reality-check a project, assess what this project actually does vs what it says, validate product claims, or score a system's credibility. Also triggers on "is this real", "does this work as claimed", "evaluate this project", "assess the gap between claims and reality", "how credible is this", "investor assessment", "score these claims", or "what's real vs marketing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Claude Code self-assessment and learning path advisor. Runs a multi-category quiz covering 10 feature areas, produces a detailed skill profile with per-topic scores, identifies specific gaps, and generates a personalized learning path with prioritized next steps. Use when asked to "assess my level", "take the quiz", "find my level", "where should I start", "what should I learn next", "check my skills", "skill check", or "level up".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, assess, and mitigate operational risks. Trigger with "what are the risks", "risk assessment", "risk register", "what could go wrong", or when the user is evaluating risks associated with a project, vendor, process, or decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deeper risk assessment for a single feature or product area when the launch review found something that needs more than a line item. Structured analysis: what could go wrong, how likely, how bad, what mitigates it. Use when user says "deep dive on this risk", "risk assessment for [feature]", "what could go wrong with", or when launch-review flags a novel issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing, then produces a scorecard with evidence-based ratings and a priority-ordered roadmap. Use when assessing or scoring the maturity of a smart contract or blockchain codebase, producing a maturity scorecard or evaluation, or judging how mature, well-tested, or well-documented such a project is against a rubric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a full AWS Well-Architected Framework review evaluating every framework question across all pillars discovered from the live AWS documentation by analyzing code, IaC, and configurations to produce evidence-backed findings with Eisenhower-prioritized remediation. Supports full reviews (every framework best practice with BP ID citations), quick reviews (question-level), pillar-scoped reviews, score-mode reviews (a maturity scorecard with per-pillar scores and filtered findings), and lens-specific reviews using lenses discovered from the live AWS documentation. Triggers on mentions of Well-Architected review, WA review, WAR, pillar assessment, architecture review across pillars, workload assessment, cloud readiness evaluation, or a Well-Architected score, grade, or scorecard request. Does not apply to single-pillar deep-dives, learning WA concepts, ADRs, or migration readiness assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute automate SOC 2 audit preparation including evidence gathering, control assessment, and compliance gap identification. Use when you need to prepare for SOC 2 audits, assess Trust Service Criteria compliance, document security controls, or generate readiness reports. Trigger with phrases like "SOC 2 audit preparation", "SOC 2 readiness assessment", "collect SOC 2 evidence", or "Trust Service Criteria compliance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clinical Research Bias Assessment - Case-Control Study (NOS) v2.3.0. Use when you need to assess the bias of a case-control study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria, or when evaluating the quality of a medical paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get foreign qualifications, degrees, or professional licenses recognised in a new country — figure out whether recognition is even needed, which body assesses it, what evidence they want, and the bridging route if there's a gap. Use when someone says 'get my degree recognised abroad', 'is my foreign license valid here', 'credential evaluation', or 'can I work as a [nurse/engineer/teacher] in [country] with my qualifications'. Produces a recognition roadmap, the assessing body, an evidence checklist, and the bridging options. Routes to official assessment bodies; requirements are country- and profession-specific.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 数据出境要申报吗, 数据出境安全评估还是标准合同, 个人信息出境标准合同怎么备案, 我们把数据传到海外总部合规吗, or decide how to transfer data out of mainland China lawfully. Produces a data map of what leaves China, the route that applies (an exemption, the personal information export standard contract, certification, or a CAC security assessment) with the thresholds to confirm, the filing steps, and the documents to prepare, including the personal information protection impact assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether and how someone can safely stay in their own home as they age — the home hazards, the support gaps, and the modifications and services that make it work. Use when asked can my parent stay in their home safely, aging in place assessment, is it safe for them to live alone, or what do we need for them to stay home. Produces a room-by-room safety read (fall hazards, accessibility), an honest look at the daily-living and support gaps, the modifications and services that could close them, warning signs that home may no longer be safe, and how to raise it respectfully — helping a family make a clear-eyed, dignity-preserving decision. Not medical advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。