「assumptions」の検索結果

Surface the agent's assumptions about a phase approach before planning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

製品の要望や企画書を、開発に着手できる具体的な要件へ整理します。業務ルール、データ、サービス間の接点、未決事項を明文化し、次の担当へ引き継ぎます。

• 製品要求書を開発要件に落としたいとき
• 複数サービスにまたがる機能の要件整理
• レビューで繰り返す前提の文書化

市場規模の推計、競合比較、投資家や技術の調査を、出典付きでまとめるスキル。事実と推測を分け、反証やリスクも含めて事業判断につながる提案を整理します。

• 市場参入前に規模を推計したいとき
• 競合の特徴や立ち位置の比較
• 相談前の投資家調査

曖昧な機能要望や影響の大きい変更を、作業範囲・前提・リスクとともに整理し、期待する動作と検証方法が明確な受け入れ基準や引き継ぎ資料にまとめるスキル。

• 曖昧な機能要望を整理したいとき
• 認証変更やデータ移行の受け入れ基準作成
• 別のエージェントやチームへの実装引き継ぎ

投資家向けの説明資料や財務モデル、資金使途表、応募書類を作成・更新し、事業実績や収益の前提、調達額、チーム情報の食い違いを複数の資料で確認するスキル。

• 投資家向け説明資料を作成・改訂したいとき
• 投資家向け概要資料やメモを作りたいとき
• 収益予測と資金使途表を作りたいとき

正解が一つに定まらない判断を、長期的な影響、前提への疑問、実行の現実性、失敗リスクの四つの視点で検討し、反対意見も見える形で推奨案をまとめるスキル。

• 今すぐ公開するか改善を待つか決めたいとき
• 段階的展開と一斉展開を比較したいとき
• 範囲の縮小と長期的な狙いを検討したいとき

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refines raw ideas into sharp, actionable concepts through structured divergent and convergent thinking. Use when an idea is still vague, when you need to stress-test assumptions before committing to a plan, or when you want to expand options before converging on one. Triggers on "ideate", "refine this idea", or "stress-test my plan".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenDesign's unit-economics and BYOK cost model: the assumptions, the sensitivity, and why it scales. Built as a decision-grade data & finance deck for CFO, investors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing mobile-first layouts, tablet experiences, fullscreen flows, forms, dashboards, or media interfaces. Check rendered behavior in both portrait and landscape and separate genuine layout constraints from unnecessary orientation assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', 'adversarial plan', 'hostile planning', 'cross-critique plan', '하이퍼플랜', '적대적 계획', '교차 비평'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided statistical analysis for research data - test selection, assumption checking, effect sizes, power analysis, Bayesian alternatives, and APA-formatted reporting. Use whenever a user wants to compare groups, test a hypothesis, analyze experimental or survey data, check statistical assumptions, compute required sample sizes, or write up results - even if they never name a specific test. Covers t-tests, ANOVA, chi-square, correlation, regression, non-parametric and Bayesian methods. For low-level model APIs, see the statsmodels and pymc skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs exact symbolic mathematics with SymPy for algebra, calculus, equation solving, symbolic linear algebra, physics, and lambdify or LaTeX code generation. Use when a task needs symbolic results, explicit assumptions, or exact arithmetic; use NumPy or SciPy for purely numerical workloads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supports structured what-if scenario analysis for research planning, experimental contingencies, and scientific project decisions. Explores favorable, reference, adverse, wild-card, contrarian, and second-order scenarios with explicit assumptions, evidence, and decision triggers. Use to stress-test a research plan under uncertainty; scenario narratives do not estimate causal effects or calibrated forecast probabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitates evidence-aware scientific ideation with independent generation, structured discussion, explicit assumptions, transparent evaluation, adversarial review, and decision logs. Use for early-stage research brainstorming or prioritizing candidate directions; hand off empirical validation, study design, ethics or regulatory review, and clinical questions to appropriate experts or skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate and audit closed and open quantum-system models with QuTiP 5, including deterministic, trajectory, steady-state, spectral, and phase-space workflows. Use for local quantum-dynamics work where physical assumptions, dimensions, and numerical convergence must be explicit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures a multi-perspective council exercise for decisions, research trade-offs, and creative challenges. Simulates thinking archetypes, separates evidence from assumptions and values, and synthesizes a conditional recommendation. Use when the user requests a council, panel, devil's advocate analysis, "mind council", or deliberate comparison of perspectives on a difficult choice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for DPAPI masterkeys, vault blobs, browser credential stores, protected secrets, domain backup keys, and secret-to-acceptance replay chains. Use when the user asks to inspect DPAPI blobs or masterkeys, recover browser or vault credentials, trace DPAPI context or backup-key use, or explain how protected Windows secrets become accepted access or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for live container runtime analysis, mounted secrets, sidecars, namespaces, init containers, entrypoint drift, and route-to-container resolution. Use when the user asks why a live container differs from manifests, where a mounted secret is consumed, how a sidecar or init container changes runtime state, or which route resolves to which live container. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for CTF web, API, SSR, frontend, queue-backed app, and routing challenges. Use when the user asks to inspect a site or API, follow real browser requests, debug auth or session flow, trace uploads or workers, find hidden routes, or explain why frontend and backend behavior diverge under sandbox-internal routing. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kerberos, WinRM, SMB, RDP, Windows credential material, replayable tickets, delegation edges, and host-to-host pivot chains. Use when the user asks to replay Kerberos material, trace a WinRM, SMB, or RDP pivot, understand host-to-host privilege movement, or prove which Windows service accepted a credential or ticket. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for image, audio, video, document, and container steganography. Use when the user asks to inspect metadata, alpha or palette channels, LSBs, thumbnails, appended trailers, QR fragments, transcoding artifacts, or recover a hidden payload from media without blind brute force. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。