「business case」の検索結果

Generates a structured attorney work product memorandum from an initial client consultation for commercial litigation. Extracts verifiable facts from uploaded documents, builds a chronological narrative, identifies parties and contracts, flags preliminary legal claims and defenses, and produces a prioritized action plan. Triggers at matter intake when a business client needs a foundational case evaluation document for a pre-filing commercial dispute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[user] Business Legal Counsel / CLO level contract drafting, review, and legal risk assessment. Handles domestic Chinese contracts (中文), cross-border contracts, and offshore international contracts in Chinese and English. Jurisdictions: PRC law (Civil Code, Company Law, Anti-Unfair Competition Law), US law (UCC, common law), Hong Kong law (common law, HK ordinances). Combines relevant laws, regulations, and litigation case precedents in contract analysis. Generates Word (.docx) files with track changes and persuasive margin comments for contract review markup. Use when user mentions contracts, legal review, contract drafting, legal risk assessment, NDA, agreement, 合同, 法律, 审核, 起草, 合同审查, 法务, legal negotiation, due diligence, 尽职调查, 风险评估, 条款谈判, 反不正当竞争, or any contract-related task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, modify, or refactor application use cases into Laravel-native DDD Actions. Use for business operations such as placing or cancelling orders, extracting controller orchestration, and fixing use-case behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base synthesized from the Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK) v2.14 by the BKCASE Project. Use for the established systems-engineering canon: SE fundamentals and foundations (systems science, systems thinking, the systems approach, modelling/MBSE), the life cycle (ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288/24748/24774 process, development & agile approaches, model selection/tailoring), technical management, concept definition, architecture/realization (the Vee), V&V, maintenance/sustainment, SE standards, and the application contexts (product, service, enterprise, systems-of-systems, healthcare), plus enabling SE (business/team/individual), related disciplines, quality attributes/specialty engineering, implementation examples, and emerging knowledge. Good for grounding background, vocabulary, and prior-art positions across all eight SEBoK Parts. SCOPE LIMITS: this pack is SEBoK v2.14 only (released 2026-05-18); it synthesizes and signposts rather than reproducing the source — it does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE standard text, is a curated guide (not a complete textbook), and is thin on AI-integration depth (Part 8 is a staging area, not settled practice). LICENCE: content is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 — non-commercial use only, attribution to the BKCASE Project required, share-alike obligations carry forward.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as an Investor archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict whose conditions read as terms, findings that cite the exact passage, capital-allocation risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run an investor review", "what would an investor say about this", "pressure-test the capital case" or "prepare me for the investment committee". Do not use for internal budget, cost or finance-function review, use cfo-reviewer instead; for revenue forecast and pipeline, use cro-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Business Officer archetype, covering commercial model, partnerships, deal structure, market positioning, strategic fit and opportunity cost, and returns a DRAFT review with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, commercial risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CBO review", "pressure-test this partnership", "check the deal structure" or "what would a commercial executive say about this". Do not use for pipeline, quota, sales-motion or forecast reviews, use cro-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Customer Advocate archetype, the seat for paying customers not in the room, and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, customer-side risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a customer advocate review", "do a voice-of-the-customer pressure-test", "what would our customers say about this" or "what does this plan really ask of paying customers". Do not use for the product evidence or roadmap case, use cpo-reviewer instead; for revenue or pricing strategy, use cro-reviewer; for the staff who operate the change, use frontline-skeptic-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenDesign renewal + seat-expansion business case for a growing customer: realized value, usage proof, and the expansion ROI. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for champion, finance approver.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenDesign's incident retro: the daemon-restart data bug, the root cause, the fix, and the systemic follow-ups. Built as a decision-grade product management deck for engineering, SRE, leadership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive security requirements from threat models and business context. Use when translating threats into actionable requirements, creating security user stories, or building security test cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user needs to transform business requirements, use case descriptions, or meeting transcripts into a technical Power Platform solution architecture, including component selection and Mermaid.js diagrams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document a business process — flowcharts, RACI, and SOPs. Use when formalizing a process that lives in someone's head, building a RACI to clarify who owns what, writing an SOP for a handoff or audit, or capturing the exceptions and edge cases of how work actually gets done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculate TAM, SAM, and SOM with explicit assumptions, methods, and caveats. Use when sizing a market for a product idea, business case, or executive review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensures projects deliver the value they were approved on — defining measurable benefits, baselining, tracking after delivery, and honest post-implementation review. Use this to define benefits for a business case, set a baseline, track whether value actually landed, or run a post-implementation review that produces something useful.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive security requirements from threat models and business context. Use when translating threats into actionable requirements, creating security user stories, or building security test cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experiment design reference for problem-class framing, Minimum Viable Experiment coaching, hypothesis formation, vetting and red flags, and experiment readiness. Use when translating a stated business outcome into candidate data-science problem classes, or when framing, vetting, scoping, or evaluating an experiment of any kind, including data feasibility, architecture, LLM, performance, use-case, UX, prototyping, and hardware experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up a chart of accounts and rules for categorizing transactions. Use when asked how to categorize expenses/transactions, set up a chart of accounts, organize bookkeeping, or sort bank transactions into the right buckets. Produces a practical chart of accounts for the business, categorization rules with examples and edge cases, and a clean-books routine — so the books are consistent and ready for an accountant. Not tax/accounting advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize a Power BI or Analysis Services semantic model end to end so it is ready for report authors, Excel users and Copilot - table groups, display folders, Title Case business names and naming conventions, hierarchies, sort-by columns, hiding, Analyze in Excel (IsAvailableInMDX), descriptions, format strings, data categories, context annotations, DAX formatting and UDFs, calculated-object justification, duplicate removal, perspectives, translations and security roles. Use whenever the user asks to "organize", "tidy", "clean up", "polish", "prepare", "standardize" or "make report-ready" a model or one table in it (for example "organize the date table"), to "fix naming conventions", "rename fields", "make names human readable" or "fix abbreviations", even when they name only one of these aspects, and whenever a model is driven through the Tabular Editor 3 MCP or the te CLI for that purpose. Not for DAX performance tuning (dax skill) or model design and star-schema changes (semantic-model skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Works out which documents you have to hand over to the other side in a civil case in England & Wales, and builds the formal list. The part it gets right that trips people up is which disclosure regime applies — Practice Direction 57AD (the Disclosure Pilot, now permanent in the Business and Property Courts, with its Models A–E) or standard disclosure under CPR Part 31 everywhere else. It picks the regime, chooses a Model per issue, structures the Disclosure Review Document, and drafts the disclosure certificate for the party to sign personally. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small teams without a precedent bank. Use when the user says 'disclosure list', 'PD 57AD', 'Model C', 'extended disclosure', 'List of Documents', 'N265', or needs to work out what must be disclosed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a project's infrastructure and SaaS stack, then produce a cost report showing what the user currently pays and what they would save by consolidating onto Temps (self-hosted or Temps Cloud). Detects hosting platforms (Vercel, Netlify, Railway, Render, Heroku, Fly.io), analytics (PostHog, Plausible, Mixpanel, Amplitude, Fathom), error tracking (Sentry, Bugsnag, Rollbar, Honeybadger), session replay (LogRocket, FullStory, Hotjar, Highlight), uptime monitoring (Pingdom, UptimeRobot, Better Stack, Checkly), managed databases (Supabase, Neon, PlanetScale, MongoDB Atlas, Upstash, RDS), and transactional email (SendGrid, Postmark, Resend, Mailgun) from dependencies, config files, and env var names. Use when the user wants to: (1) Know how much they would save by switching to Temps, (2) Audit their SaaS/infrastructure spend, (3) Compare their current stack's cost against self-hosting, (4) Decide whether Temps is worth it, (5) Build a business case for consolidating tools. Triggers: "how much would I save", "temps savings", "cost comparison", "audit my stack", "am I overpaying", "saas spend", "calculate savings", "is temps cheaper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The 3-bullet creative ideas email. Produces three per-company bullets that each sit in a slot the operator defined up front, so the model fills in the company detail and never invents a new idea. Triggers on "creative ideas campaign", "three ideas email", "I had a few ideas for you", "3 bullets", "use cases for their business", "what could they build with us". Outputs creative_idea_1, creative_idea_2, creative_idea_3 plus a rendered bullet block.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dung khi mot CA NHAN can AM THANH bang AI — clone giong noi, lam podcast, audiobook, voiceover cho video: 3 use case gom voiceover ngan cho TikTok va Reels, podcast 30-60 phut, audiobook; quy trinh thu mau giong, chinh cam xuc va toc do, cong bo dung luat, tai su dung 1 podcast thanh 10 clip ngan. Kich hoat khi user nhac 'voice clone', 'clone giong noi', 'ElevenLabs', 'lam podcast', 'audio AI', 'voiceover AI', 'ngai thu am moi ngay', 'cat podcast ra clip ngan'. Khong dung cho — video co hinh anh nguoi hoac avatar thi dung skill 24-ai-avatar-production; viet loi thoai va hook noi thi dung skill 04-script-video; viet bai dai dang chu thi dung skill 26-thought-leadership-content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate requirements via atomic AC decomposition, actor/permission matrices, and truth-table edge cases; enforce User Story standards (scope fences, platform tags, toggles). Use when writing/reviewing Stories or AC with multi-condition logic, feature toggles, or market variants (VN/MY/SG).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculate comprehensive ROI for AI implementation projects. Takes current costs, manual process time, team size, and hourly rates. Generates detailed roi-analysis.md with executive summary, cost-benefit tables, sensitivity analysis, break-even timeline, and comparison scenarios. Use when evaluating AI investments, building business cases, or justifying automation spend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。