「check」の検索結果

Djangoの公開や変更提案の前に、環境・コード品質・データベース変更・テスト・脆弱性・設定を順に検証し、段階別の合否と修正すべき問題をレポートにまとめます。

• Djangoの変更提案前の確認
• マイグレーションを確認したいとき
• テストカバレッジの目標確認

Health-check the user's Claude Code setup and fix issues: diagnose installation health — what the `claude doctor` terminal diagnostics cover — from local data (duplicate or leftover installs, PATH, unparseable settings files, broken or colliding agent definitions, skills whose frontmatter fails to parse); find unused skills, MCP servers, and plugins versus their context cost and disable dead weight; deduplicate local CLAUDE.md files against checked-in ones; trim checked-in CLAUDE.md files by cutting content a session could derive from the codebase (directory layouts, tech-stack lists, architecture overviews) while keeping gotchas, rationale, and non-standard conventions; migrate always-loaded CLAUDE.md guidance into lazy skills and nested CLAUDE.md files; flag slow hooks and context-heavy extensions; check the installed version is current; make auto mode the default permission mode; and pre-approve frequently denied read-only commands. Use when the user asks for a doctor run, checkup, audit, tune-up, or cleanup of their Claude Code setup or configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What's blocking close — maintain the closing checklist with status, critical path, and days to close. Self-updating: ingests new items from diligence findings and schedule builds, tracks status, surfaces what's blocking. Use when user says "closing checklist", "what's left to close", "checklist status", "add to the checklist", or on a scheduled status pull.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production-ready CSS transitions for web apps. Use when implementing notification badges, dropdowns, modals, panel reveals, page transitions, card resizes, number pop-ins, text swaps, icon swaps, success checks, avatar group hovers, error state shakes, search/input clear, skeleton loaders, shimmer text, sliding tabs, tooltips, staggered text reveals, card hover tilt, plus-to-menu morph, accordions, toasts, like buttons, learn-more hovers, checkbox checks, spinning counters, toggles, AI thinking states, reasoning streams, streaming text, matrix dot loaders, or banner stacking. Triggers on "add a transition", "animate the dropdown", "make the modal open smoothly", "swap icon", "page slide", "stagger animation", "open / close transition", "make it animate", "fade between", "success animation", "form error", "shake on invalid", "hover lift", "avatar stack hover", "clear the search", "skeleton loader", "loading shimmer", "shimmer text", "sliding tabs", "segmented control", "tooltip", "reveal text", "tilt card", "3D hover tilt", "cursor glare", "plus to menu", "FAB morph", "accordion", "collapsible", "expand / collapse", "disclosure", "toast", "snackbar", "like button", "heart animation", "learn more arrow", "checkbox", "check animation", "spinning counter", "odometer", "slot machine digits", "toggle", "switch", "thinking states", "AI status line", "agent reasoning", "reasoning stream", "streaming text", "stream words in", "matrix loader", "dot loader", "banner stack", "stacked toasts". Also "motion tokens", "scan for ad-hoc transitions", "replace hardcoded durations with motion tokens", "tokenize my animations", and the commands transitions reveal, transitions review, transitions apply, transitions refine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

APSA style checker for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks numbers, capitalization, abbreviations, italics, in-text citations, titles of works, neutral and unbiased language, and APSA-specific terminology against the APSA Style Manual for Political Science (2018, updated 2023). Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to check APSA style, fix citations, review capitalization, check number formatting, or flag biased language in a .qmd document. For grammar, spelling, and punctuation, use the proofread skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Risky command screened by Jev: Jev action check before a risky command: secrets, outbound sends, blast radius; can only add a hold. Use when the user says: jev-action-check, jev action check, ask jev if this command is safe, jev risk check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Completion claim tested by Jev: Jev done check: does the gathered evidence support the completion claim? It can only object. Use when the user says: jev-done-check, jev done check, ask jev if this is done, jev evidence check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-deployment validation for Azure readiness. Run deep checks on configuration, infrastructure (Bicep or Terraform), RBAC role assignments, managed identity permissions, and prerequisites before deploying. WHEN: validate my app, check deployment readiness, run preflight checks, verify configuration, check if ready to deploy, validate azure.yaml, validate Bicep, test before deploying, troubleshoot deployment errors, validate Azure Functions, validate function app, validate serverless deployment, verify RBAC roles, check role assignments, review managed identity permissions, what-if analysis, validate Container Apps deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualify a check before it is allowed to clear anything — prove it can detect the failure it is meant to catch. Seeds known defects into a copy of a real artifact plus a clean control, runs the checker, and reports recall and false-positive rate into a qualification ledger. Use when the user says "does this check work", "qualify the gate", "test my reviewer", "seed defects", "vaccinate", "qualify the checks", "can I trust this review", "does it pass for the right reason", or before relying on any automated check or referee simulation for a decision that matters. NOT a code fixer and NOT a reviewer itself — it grades the grader.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-deployment validation for Azure readiness. Run deep checks on configuration, infrastructure (Bicep or Terraform), RBAC role assignments, managed identity permissions, and prerequisites before deploying. WHEN: validate my app, check deployment readiness, run preflight checks, verify configuration, check if ready to deploy, validate azure.yaml, validate Bicep, test before deploying, troubleshoot deployment errors, validate Azure Functions, validate function app, validate serverless deployment, verify RBAC roles, check role assignments, review managed identity permissions, what-if analysis, validate Container Apps deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks about work done outside this session - "check work", "check the others", "check other sessions" - or to accept one: "the session is done, check it", "can we merge it" - in any language. You are the receiving party: treat the report as a claim, verify each part against machine state, name every gap between claimed and true. Verified-ready work merges in the same pass. End with what is left, one next step, and any reply another session needs, ready to paste.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks to check Simulink model compliance against a standard (MISRA, MAB, JMAAB, ISO, DO, IEC, EN, CERT C/CWE, AUTOSAR, Simulink Code Inspector (SLCI)), wants to run Model Advisor checks, or needs a compliance report with fix suggestions. For JMAAB/MAB, supplement deterministic checks with agentic review of uncheckable guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic final verification pass on completed deliverables. Runs at the end of every fable-mode run — those skills invoke it before delivery. Also triggers when the user says "double check this". Uses a panel of fresh checker agents when spawning is authorized (otherwise a cold self-check) to verify the finished output — not to redo the task. Any FAIL gets fixed and re-checked before delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies UK case-law citations, pinpoint references and quotations against the official public register — The National Archives' Find Case Law — and statutory references against legislation.gov.uk, before a document that cites them is relied on, served or filed. Every check returns a graded verdict: VERIFIED, MISMATCH (the citation resolves to a different case — the classic AI miscitation), NOT ON REGISTER, OUTSIDE COVERAGE (the register cannot answer — absence proves nothing), or UNCHECKABLE (a law-report citation). The grading exists because there are two ways to get this wrong: citing a case that does not exist, and accusing a real case of not existing. Use when asked to check citations, verify a case exists, confirm a quotation is verbatim, check a pinpoint paragraph, audit a draft's authorities, screen a document for hallucinated cases, or check a statutory provision is in force. Not a substitute for reading the judgment: existence is not authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want to brainstorm and check available .com domains for a new project — brand naming, aftermarket pricing (HugeDomains / Afternic / Sedo / Dan), USPTO trademark screening, and social handle availability. Built on Laura Roeder's "work backwards from availability" method. Combines Vercel CLI, whois, Domainr, Namecheap, and agent-browser, each for what it reliably does. Workflow: budget → brainstorm → availability check → whois cross-check → price → aftermarket sweep (plus liveness probe and drop-watch) → bucket → negotiate → trademark + socials → buy. Triggers on "/domain," "find a domain," "check domain availability," "brainstorm a domain," "what .com is available for X," "domain hunt," "name my project," "is X.com available," "aftermarket price on X.com," "trademark check for X."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Due diligence checklists for A-share investments and M&A transactions. Adapted from the original dd-checklist skill for Chinese market due diligence requirements, regulatory filings, and business practices. Triggers on "A股尽调清单", "尽调清单", "due diligence China", "DD checklist A-share", "尽调checklist [company]", or "due diligence questions [company]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality check investment banking pitch decks for A-share M&A and capital raising transactions. Adapts the original ib-check-deck skill for Chinese market standards, CAS financials, and domestic IB conventions. Triggers on "投行deck检查", "IB deck QC", "check pitch deck China", "deck quality check", "材料质量检查", or "review deck [company/transaction]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Always-on spam and deliverability guardrails for cold email copy. Apply these rules whenever writing, reviewing, or QA-ing subject lines, openers, follow-ups, CTAs, or any cold outreach copy. Trigger on phrases like "check this for spam", "spam word check", "deliverability review", "QA this copy", "flag banned words", "check subject line", "is this safe to send", "scan for spam triggers", or any time cold email copy is being generated or reviewed. Also trigger automatically as a background rule whenever the campaign-copywriting or cold-email-copywriting skill is active -- these guardrails apply to EVERY piece of outbound copy generated, even if the user does not explicitly ask for a check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates a Check for Understanding (CFU) for a math topic or standard: 1–3 targeted formative items whose distractors come from documented student misconceptions, plus a teacher guide routing each likely response to a specific next instructional step. Load BEFORE asking any clarifying question about grade, standard, or topic. This skill is for math; for other subjects, help as you normally would and don't mention the skill to the user. Triggers on asks to create, write, generate, or design a check for understanding, formative check, quick check, or exit ticket for a math concept or standard, and on implicit signals like "I need to see who got it before I move on." Not a quiz, test, or practice set — a CFU is read for what it reveals, not scored, so a numbered quiz or a bare answer key is a different job. Does not create a lesson (k12-lesson-plan-creation, which brings its own exit ticket), tier one (k12-lesson-differentiation), or prepare a teacher to teach one (k12-lesson-prep).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages privacy compliance for employee background checks including criminal record processing under Art. 10 GDPR, DBS checks (UK), national law variations, and reference verification. Applies proportionality and data minimisation to pre-employment screening, defines retention limits, and addresses role-based necessity assessments. Keywords: background check, criminal record, Art. 10, DBS, pre-employment screening, vetting, data minimisation, proportionality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check behavioral consistency between high-level hardware specifications and RTL implementations. Use when asked to check RTL consistency, verify RTL against spec, check hardware specification compliance, validate RTL implementation, find spec violations in RTL, check behavioral consistency, or when working with hardware designs that need verification against protocol specifications, timing requirements, or functional specifications in Verilog, VHDL, or SystemVerilog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits any domain's AI-readiness by using curl to directly probe robots.txt, llms.txt, and llms-full.txt, then scores each file against a structured checklist and delivers a formatted report with pass/warn/fail findings and actionable fixes. Use this skill whenever a user provides a domain or URL and wants to know if llms.txt or llms-full.txt is available, discoverable, or properly structured. Trigger on phrases like "check llms.txt for", "does this site have llms.txt", "find llms.txt", "check llms for this url", "audit llms.txt", "is llms-full.txt available", or any time a user shares a domain/docs URL and wants AI-readiness checked. Also trigger when the user wants to verify GEO/AEO readiness of a documentation site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all statistical claims (numbers, percentages, named sources), fetches each cited URL via WebFetch, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。