「concrete design」の検索結果

Assesses whether a medical research topic is worth starting now by separating true novelty from pseudo-novelty, auditing real feasibility under stated resource constraints, and forcing a concrete start / narrow / redesign / stop decision. Always require explicit assumptions and never fabricate references, datasets, resource availability, precedent studies, or publication claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When two design requirements seem mutually exclusive, name the contradiction, separate conflicting states, then invent a concrete no-compromise resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the scientific method to debugging by helping users form specific, testable hypotheses, design targeted experiments, and systematically confirm or reject theories to find root causes. Use when a user says their code isn't working, they're getting an error, something broke, they want to troubleshoot a bug, or they're trying to figure out what's causing an issue. Concrete actions include isolating failing components, forming and testing hypotheses, analyzing error messages, tracing execution paths, and interpreting test results to narrow down root causes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a repo's agent context — CLAUDE.md files, codebase docs, skills, and tool/MCP designs — against Anthropic's Claude 5 context-engineering guidance ("unhobbling": Anthropic cut ~80% of Claude Code's system prompt with no eval loss). Finds overconstraint, conflicting instructions, redundancy, stale facts, and missing "unknown knowns"; produces a scored findings report with concrete rewrites, then applies approved fixes. Use when someone says "audit my CLAUDE.md", "context audit", "unhobble this repo", "review our agent docs/skills/tools", or after upgrading to Claude 5-generation models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits an existing lesson against UDL's three principles — engagement, representation, and action/expression. Identifies specific access barriers and suggests concrete modifications ranked by impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a direct experience into a full learning cycle with concrete experience, reflection, and conceptual transfer. Use when planning field trips, simulations, or practical tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the SUCCESs Framework from Made to Stick by Chip Heath and Dan Heath. Use when crafting messages that need to be remembered, writing pitches, creating presentations, designing training materials, telling stories that drive action, or diagnosing why a message isn't landing. The six principles (Simple, Unexpected, Concrete, Credible, Emotional, Stories) diagnose and fix communication failures. Triggers include 'how do I make this memorable', 'my pitch isn't landing', 'people forget what we told them', 'how do I tell a better story', 'our training materials are boring', 'how do I present data compellingly', 'nobody remembers our message', 'how do I get people to care about this', 'my writing is too abstract'. NOT for channel selection (use Traction), not for brand messaging structure (use StoryBrand), not for positioning (use Obviously Awesome).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review uncommitted code changes to find unreasonable design, unfinished requirements, potential bugs, missed reuse opportunities, and optimization opportunities. Use when the user asks for a review of pending, uncommitted, or unpublished code changes and expects both findings and concrete improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize Android strings, drawables, fonts, themes, localization, and concrete resource-backed Compose values such as MaterialTheme colors. Use for resource declarations and their direct UI lookup; defer design-system token architecture, network image loading, lint-rule configuration, and general Compose implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screenshot comparison QA for frontend development. Takes a screenshot of the current implementation, scores it across multiple visual dimensions, and returns a structured PASS/REVISE/FAIL verdict with concrete fixes. Use when implementing UI from a design reference or verifying visual correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Java change needs independent Behavior-Driven Development guidance from trusted behavior facts through concrete examples and observable scenarios, with focused clarification when behavior is pending or ambiguous. This should trigger for requests such as Apply BDD; Facilitate behavior examples; Discover scenarios with Given When Then; Review these examples for shared domain language; Complete BDD discovery as a self-contained interaction. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have an approved research question and need a concrete analysis plan, before touching outcome data or fitting any model

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn rich agent answers and any file, folder, URL, or export into a polished single-file HTML page. Auto-picks a default route plus 17 concrete design systems (teaching, dashboard, atlas, timeline-story, document, …).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn rich agent answers and any file, folder, URL, or export into a polished single-file HTML page. Auto-picks a default route plus 17 concrete design systems (teaching, dashboard, atlas, timeline-story, document, …).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits an existing lesson against UDL's three principles — engagement, representation, and action/expression. Identifies specific access barriers and suggests concrete modifications ranked by impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a direct experience into a full learning cycle with concrete experience, reflection, and conceptual transfer. Use when planning field trips, simulations, or practical tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the PLAN artifact from SAM Stage 2 needs contextualization against actual codebase state — grounds the design plan in reality by performing scope analysis (NEW/MODIFY/COMPLETE classification), conflict detection between plan assumptions and codebase patterns, and resource mapping to concrete file paths and integration points. Produces an updated ARTIFACT:PLAN registered via MCP with a Contextualization section appended.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Construct well-structured arguments using the hypothesis-argument-example triad. Covers formulating falsifiable hypotheses, building logical arguments (deductive, inductive, analogical, evidential), providing concrete examples, and steelmanning counterarguments. Use when writing or reviewing PR descriptions that propose technical changes, justifying design decisions in ADRs, constructing substantive code review feedback, or building a research argument or technical proposal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a repo's agent context — CLAUDE.md files, codebase docs, skills, and tool/MCP designs — against Anthropic's Claude 5 context-engineering guidance ("unhobbling": Anthropic cut ~80% of Claude Code's system prompt with no eval loss). Finds overconstraint, conflicting instructions, redundancy, stale facts, and missing "unknown knowns"; produces a scored findings report with concrete rewrites, then applies approved fixes. Use when someone says "audit my CLAUDE.md", "context audit", "unhobble this repo", "review our agent docs/skills/tools", or after upgrading to Claude 5-generation models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review proposed abstractions, dependencies, and configuration for concrete consumers and maintenance cost when simplifying a design or checking overengineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure design/ADR changes include a concrete migration plan, rollout strategy, rollback conditions, and compatibility considerations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Raw, anti-design aesthetic inspired by concrete architecture with unadorned elements, jarring layouts, and functional minimalism.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a detailed, step-by-step implementation plan for a feature or project. Load when the user asks to plan a feature, create a technical roadmap, break down a PRD into tasks, design an implementation strategy, or sequence engineering work. Also triggers on "how should we build this", "implementation plan for", "technical breakdown", "task list for", or any request to turn a high-level requirement into a concrete execution plan. Supports phased rollouts, architecture-first, and MVP-focused planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。