「contribution」の検索結果

Draft Apache Airflow commit messages, PR titles and descriptions, or GitHub comments and reviews. Also use for release-note decisions when preparing a contribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare or carry out authorized publication of Apache Airflow changes, including remote checks, pre-push verification, PR creation, and tracking deferred work. Also use when planning these steps or managing contribution issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft performance reviews, self-assessments, peer reviews, and upward feedback in your own voice. Analyzes your contributions, emails, and meeting history via WorkIQ, then produces honest, impact-focused drafts using the STAR format. USE FOR: write my performance review, draft self-assessment, peer review, 360 feedback, annual review, mid-year review, upward feedback, write review for colleague, performance appraisal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

All changes to code must follow the guidance documented in the repository. Before any issue is filed, branch is made, commits generated, or pull request (or PR) created, a search must be done to ensure the right steps are followed. Whenever asked to create an issue, commit messages, to push code, or create a PR, use this skill so everything is done correctly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make any repo AI-ready — analyzes your codebase and generates AGENTS.md, copilot-instructions.md, CI workflows, issue templates, and more. Mines your PR review patterns and creates files customized to your stack. USE THIS SKILL when the user asks to "make this repo ai-ready", "set up AI config", or "prepare this repo for AI contributions".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a pull request against the SGLang Cookbook (docs/, Mintlify) contribution checklist — the config-driven format (per-model config + benchmarks JSX consumed by the shared _deployment.jsx / _playground.jsx engines). Run with /cookbook-review-pr <PR number>.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before opening a PR, or whenever asked to self-review a diffusers contribution. Applies the same rubric as the `@claude` CI (checks the diff against references/review-rules.md, traces call paths for dead code). Reports findings grouped by severity, flagging what to fix before submitting (blocking issues + dead code) vs what to leave for the actual review. Report-only — does not edit files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The house format and rules for writing or updating an agentmemory skill. Use when adding a new skill, restructuring an existing one, or reviewing a skill contribution for consistency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes /cs:boardroom, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage context-mode GitHub issues, PRs, releases, and marketing with parallel subagent army. Orchestrates 10-20 dynamic agents per task. Use when triaging issues, reviewing PRs, releasing versions, writing LinkedIn posts, announcing releases, fixing bugs, merging contributions, validating ENV vars, testing adapters, or syncing branches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer NemoClaw maintainer policy questions about triage, labels, Project fields, releases, or competing contributions. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when modifying an existing PEFT method (its forward method, parameters/buffers, state_dict handling, or config defaults) to ensure that existing checkpoints keep working.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap. Use after `research-refine`, or when the user asks for a detailed experiment plan, ablation matrix, evaluation protocol, run order, compute budget, or paper-ready validation that supports the core problem, novelty, simplicity, and any LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL-based contribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "merge a PR", "review and merge pull requests", "integrate external contributions", "handle PR conflicts", "cherry-pick from a PR", or needs to merge GitHub PRs while maximizing contributor attribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up a Superset open-source contribution, from forking and cloning superset-sh/superset through local dev setup and the repo's rules to a merge-ready PR. Use when the user wants to contribute to Superset, fix a Superset bug themselves, add a feature to Superset, or prepare a PR against superset-sh/superset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage and review open GitHub issues and PRs against project templates and contribution guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculate and model paid-media CPA, CPL, CPC, CPM, ROAS, MER, break-even targets, contribution margin, LTV:CAC, impression-share opportunity, budgets, forecasts, and experiment economics. Use for PPC math, ad calculator, break-even analysis, ROAS calculator, CPA calculator, budget forecast, LTV CAC, or MER.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the contribution workflow for Apache Beam, including creating PRs, issue management, code review process, release cycles, and rigorous evaluation rules for high-risk core component changes. Use when contributing code, creating PRs, or modifying core Beam components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the contribution flow is in scope: opening an issue, drafting or editing a PR body, splitting a change into chained/stacked PRs, or auditing a PR before requesting review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses a research paper outline (.qmd file) against structured criteria from Kosuke Imai's empirical research guide. Evaluates the abstract and section outline for: research question clarity, stated contributions, hypotheses and testable implications, data description, planned results and inferential approach, and robustness checks. Detects causal papers from the abstract and conditionally assesses identification strategy only when causal framing is present. Produces a structured markdown report with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL assessments and actionable suggestions. Use when asked to assess, evaluate, review, or check a paper outline, abstract-and-outline, or research plan in a .qmd file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a fast 2-agent pre-submission check for an economics paper — focuses on contribution, identification, and causal overclaiming. Completes in ~1 minute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes expert academic paper summaries for social science research, particularly political science and applied statistics. Use when asked to summarize, review, or create a reading summary of an academic paper, PDF, or research article. Accepts a file (PDF or text format) or a directory of papers. Produces a structured markdown summary — approximately 400–600 words — covering primary contributions, major questions and answers with point estimates, methods and data, and limitations and robustness. Includes BibTeX citation retrieved from Google Scholar and keyword metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a paper's contribution novelty, identify best-fit SSCI journal fields and ABS star rating, and recommend 20 target journals. Trigger when user says "paper submission" / "paper-submission" / "投稿评估" / "期刊推荐" / "target journal" / "选刊".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deeply analyze any empirical economics PDF using the five-question framework (五问框架): research question, identification strategy, core estimand, robustness logic, and scholarly contribution. Converts the PDF to Markdown, dispatches 5 parallel sub-agents (one per question), then compiles a 2000–3000 Chinese-character report with a transferable methodology checklist. Optimized for empirical economics papers in top journals (AER, QJE, JPE, RFS, RoF, JFE, etc.). Use this skill whenever the user wants to: - systematically analyze an empirical economics paper - apply the 五问框架 (five-question framework) to a paper - extract transferable research design elements from a top-journal paper - understand a paper's identification strategy, estimand, or robustness logic - run /five-questions, /five-q, or /paper-five-q-analysis - "帮我做五问分析", "用五问框架分析这篇论文", "analyze this paper with the five-question framework"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。