77 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Seven-role depersonalised panel review of framework artefacts (KUD, criterion bank, LT definition, crosswalk, scope-and-sequence) in sequential-isolation mode. Gate rule mean>=88 AND no role<70.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a five-level rubric with coherent logic for a learning target within a developmental band. Use for Manning methodology programmes where Competent = success. For general curriculum rubrics, use criterion-referenced-rubric-generator instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies provider credentials via NPI MCP, searches Medicare coverage policies via CMS Coverage MCP, and maps clinical evidence to policy criteria with MET/NOT_MET/INSUFFICIENT assessment, per-criterion confidence scoring, and documentation gap analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experience-based and environment-based learning design drawn from Dewey and Montessori. Covers Dewey's criterion of continuity and interaction, the reflective-thinking cycle, Montessori's prepared environment, sensitive periods, child-led inquiry, the role of self-correcting materials, project-based learning, and the relationship between autonomy and discipline. Use when designing hands-on activities, arranging learning spaces, integrating classroom work with real experience, or evaluating whether a lesson is genuinely experiential versus merely "activity-based."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Foundations of digital signal processing — sampling, aliasing, the Nyquist criterion, quantization, convolution, the discrete Fourier transform, FFT, FIR and IIR filter design, windowing, spectral leakage, and practical issues in fixed-point versus floating-point implementation. Use when designing filters, analyzing spectra, choosing sample rates, reasoning about aliasing, or implementing DSP algorithms on a microcontroller, DSP chip, or host CPU.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes a QA specification (specs/qa/QA-<N>-<slug>.md) written by /plan-qa: drives every step with the plan's drivers, verifies each Expected line mechanically ([assert]) or by evidence-backed judgment against the plan's written criterion ([judge]), pauses at named operator handoffs, and writes the results artifact QA-RESULTS-<N>-<slug>.md. Use only when the user asks to run or execute a QA plan — never trigger automatically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Source pre-2016 cinema with gothic/occult sensibility, literary texture, and historical grandeur — build watchlists, curate Criterion/MUBI picks. Uses Perplexity for film discourse, Exa for web search, Firecrawl for scraping. Triggers on film recommendations, watchlist, gothic cinema, occult film, arthouse, pre-2016 movies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a tensegrity system by identifying compression struts and tension cables, classifying type (class 1/2, biological/architectural), computing prestress equilibrium, verifying stability via Maxwell's rigidity criterion, and mapping biological tensegrity (microtubules, actin, intermediate filaments). Use when evaluating tensegrity in architecture, robotics, cell biology, or any system with isolated compression in continuous tension.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Risk Assessment & Position Sizing — volatility profile (beta/ATR/HV), historical drawdowns, correlation analysis, liquidity risk, position sizing tables (fixed %, volatility-adjusted, Kelly Criterion), and VaR estimates. Returns Risk Score (0-100, higher = safer). Triggered by "trade risk <TICKER>".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits whether a machine-readable regelrecht law model is faithful to the LETTER of the wettekst — and strictly separates the wettekst (leading) from the toelichting (Nota/Memorie van Toelichting; explanatory, not a norm). Runs in critical passes per article/lid and detects four deviation classes: toelichting-bleed (a modeled criterion that the letter only states as an open norm, or not at all), missing verbatim elements (a word/condition such as a "tenzij" or a qualifier dropped from the model), wrong legal_basis anchoring (an endpoint hung on a "kapstok"-article while the operative norm lives elsewhere), and verbatim-drift in text: (an ingetrokken/older redaction). Also detects positief-lid vs uitsluitings-lid conflicts and checks the chapeau for an explicit derogation rule ("zo nodig in afwijking van het eerste lid") before judging precedence. Classifies every finding as modelfout (fix), wettekst-gevolg (report, do not fix), or letter-vs-toelichting-question (jurist decides what is leading + revision signal). Use when the user wants to know if a model is "dicht bij de letter", mentions letter vs toelichting/bedoeling, fidelity, "natuurgetrouw", or before trusting feature outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read a story file and implement it. Loads the full context (story, GDD requirement, ADR guidelines, control manifest), routes to the right programmer agent for the system and engine, implements the code and test, and confirms each acceptance criterion. The core implementation skill — run after /story-readiness, before /code-review and /story-done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure Dynamic Forms (field and section visibility on Lightning record pages) and Dynamic Actions (button and action visibility rules) in Lightning App Builder — enabling Dynamic Forms, converting page layout fields with the Upgrade Now wizard, writing field visibility rules (field value, profile, permission, record type, device), and controlling action bar visibility. NOT for page layout design or record type assignment — use admin/record-types-and-page-layouts. NOT for a full layout-to-Dynamic-Forms migration across record types or profiles — use admin/dynamic-forms-migration. Keywords: flexipage, fieldInstance, fieldItem, uiBehavior, visibilityRule, booleanFilter, UiFormulaCriterion, actionOverrides, profileActionOverrides, page activation, org default page, App Builder Upgrade Now.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify-before-done — exercise the current change end-to-end against its acceptance criteria (the SDD plan's, or the ticket's) and report a per-criterion PASS/FAIL verdict, then record the outcome to memory. This is the concrete action that satisfies moflo's verify-before-done gate (`gates.verify_before_done` / `/flo -v` / `/flo -sd`). Use before `gh pr create` when the change must be proven to work, not just tested in passing. Verifies only — it does not fix; on FAIL it reports the gaps and stops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A gate before git push / deploy — assembled from your own tools (secret-grep + slop-scan + code-review + build/compile + optional worktree isolation), so AI junk (slop / bugs / secrets / uncompiled code) never reaches a remote or a production server. Turns "I hope it's clean" into a verifiable criterion. Branches: web/OSS (git push/PR) vs deploy-to-server service. Triggers — "check before push", "clean push", "gate before push", "finalize before commit", "run before deploy".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Oracle-bound spec-review check that every structured Rollout prerequisite binds to an enforcement-type acceptance criterion. A prerequisite whose `enforced-by` is missing, dangling, or points at a non-enforcement AC is a BLOCKER (hard-blocks implementation entry via the checker fan-out verdict); a prerequisite left in free prose is ADVISORY. Read-only. Runs in the spec-review fan-out before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a diff needs a requirement review — does it satisfy every stated acceptance criterion — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge. Never infers criteria from the diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load this skill whenever you are filing, reviewing, or generating accessibility bug reports — whether from automated tool output, manual testing, user reports, or testing with disabled people. The purpose of this skill is to make accessibility findings easier to report accurately, connect them to real people and tasks, and let developers reproduce, understand, and fix them without unnecessary back-and-forth. Absolutely always describe the barrier and its task impact before citing a WCAG criterion. Under no circumstances guess a disability diagnosis, treat automated tool output as a conformance conclusion, or expose secrets/personal data in a report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Process] Use when the developer wants something explained or taught, or wants to know HOW TO REVIEW a change — by default the current working tasks + changes in context, or whatever the prompt names (a plan, a subsystem, a decision, a concept, a bug). AI derives WHAT to explain from the prompt and ALWAYS delivers a teacher-and-coach review guide, high level first then detail: what was done, a VISUAL MAP (system flowchart, domain ERD, sequence diagrams), the user stories and business rules with their REAL test-case IDs, a REVIEW PATH naming which files to open first and in what order with an exit criterion per stage, the technical concepts needed to follow it, how it works, why THIS solution, every alternative option with pros/cons, the trade-offs accepted, the blast radius, HOW TO TEST AND DEMO the change, the developer's decision levers, and written challenge prompts that provoke the reader to pressure-test the work. Works at ANY scope — from one line of code to the whole project: it SIZES the target into a scope tier, DECOMPOSES a large one into understanding groups, BREAKS the work into tasks before the first deep read, and ACCUMULATES the report group by group on disk so a huge explanation stays complete instead of thinning out. Writes the full report to a single combined markdown file (plans/reports/understand-*.md) that opens with a detailed summary section — or delivers it in full in chat when Step 3 finds no git-ignored directory for it — and always summarizes it in chat. Regardless of coding level. Never interrogates, never quizzes, never blocks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use after completing any non-trivial task. The agent self-rates its output on 5 axes — accuracy, completeness, clarity, actionability, conciseness — with concrete evidence per criterion. Produces a structured 1-5 scorecard with specific improvement suggestions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-language test infrastructure for the Pump SDK — Rust unit/integration/security/performance tests, TypeScript Jest tests, Python fuzz tests, shell test orchestration, Criterion benchmarks, and CI quality gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production-grade multi-threaded Rust vanity address generator for Solana — 100K+ keys/sec using Rayon parallel iterators with solana-sdk, Base58 pattern matching, prefix/suffix support, security-hardened file output, and Criterion benchmarks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。