「deep-research」の検索結果

读取调研outline，为每个item启动独立agent进行深度调研。禁用task output。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qianfan Deep Research Agent for complex research tasks. Combines information retrieval, multi-source analysis, content synthesis, and report generation. Use when user needs in-depth research, analysis reports, or comprehensive investigation on complex topics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent research orchestration: split a research goal into parallel sub-goals, run each via headless `claude -p` subprocesses, aggregate results into a polished report file. Use for systematic web/document research, competitive or industry analysis, batch link/dataset processing, and long-form evidence synthesis. Triggers: "深度调研", "deep research", "wide research", "多 Agent 调研", "系统调研".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gated checklist to choose or review a library, framework, storage, data format, model, build-vs-buy or architecture. Run favorites-search before external research when installed. Compare candidates and trade-offs; select within authorization or return user-owned choices. Use for 用哪个 / 选什么框架 / 要不要自建 / A 还是 B / 这个方案行不行 and before committing to one. Research reports → deep-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs adversarial due-diligence on a benchmark the user envies — a founder, KOL, company, or product whose success looks inflated — splitting marketing bubble from real signal, then mapping the validated playbook onto the user's own resources. Use for 尽调/对标/拆解 a competitor, 抄/偷师 their playbook, or suspecting 水分/泡沫 in claims. Prefer over deep-research when debunking inflated claims, not a neutral briefing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clones and audits competitor repositories into evidence-based intelligence with file:line citations. Use to track competitors, add a competitor repo, review competitor code, compare capabilities, build a competitor landscape, or check for code updates: 竞品分析 / 竞品 / competitor scan / analyze competitor / compare with X / latest competitor code. Not for market research without code (use deep-research).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates reusable, source-traced research reports and coordinates provider/mode lanes with original exports. Use for 深度研究, 调研报告, literature reviews, market or company research, and ChatGPT/Kimi/UniFuncs research routes. Technology choice uses tech-selection; competitor code uses competitors-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source research with source triangulation and fact-checking. Use for any research task requiring 3+ sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research and discovery before building something new. Explores local projects for reusable code, researches competitors, reads forums and reviews, analyses plugin ecosystems, investigates technical options, and produces a comprehensive research brief. Three depths: focused (30 min), wide (1-2 hours), deep (3-6 hours). Triggers: 'research this', 'discovery', 'explore the space', 'what should I build', 'competitive analysis', 'before I start building', 'research before coding'. Not for cited fact-checking research reports (a separate harness does those); this is pre-build product discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want to monitor known sources on a schedule and feed the good stuff into your second brain. Configure sources once (YouTube, RSS/newsletters, subreddits, Hacker News, Bluesky, Mastodon, X, LinkedIn, keyword searches); each run fetches only what's new, scores it against your stated focus, writes one digest to the vault, and auto-captures high-signal items into raw/. Everything else waits in the digest until you promote it. Modes — run, digest, promote, add / sources / pause, doctor, schedule (daily launchd or systemd job). Triggers on "/radar," "run my radar," "check my sources," "what's new from my sources," "add a source," "monitor this channel," "watch this subreddit," "track this account," "daily digest," "promote item 4," "radar doctor." Complements second-brain (radar fills raw/, second-brain compiles it) and deep-research (standing surveillance vs a one-off dive).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want to capture into, compile, query, lint, or connect your personal Second Brain. Wraps the Karpathy LLM Wiki schema (Obsidian or any markdown vault) — raw/ (unprocessed sources), wiki/ (AI-compiled interlinked topic pages), outputs/ (generated artifacts). Tool-agnostic in design but defaults to a vault at ${SECOND_BRAIN_VAULT:-$HOME/Documents/SecondBrain}/. Six modes — capture (drop something into raw/), compile (process unprocessed raw files into wiki pages, update INDEX.md), query (answer a question from the wiki, save to outputs/), lint (orphans / contradictions / stale / unprocessed raw / topic gaps), connect (suggest new wikilinks between pages), search (quick lookup). Triggers on "/second-brain," "/sb," "capture this," "save this to my brain," "compile the wiki," "process raw notes," "query my wiki," "ask my brain," "lint the wiki," "find connections," "search my notes." Complements deep-research (external corpus) — this is the internal corpus.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you or another skill needs to fetch the content of a social media post by URL — tweet, X thread, LinkedIn post, Instagram post, TikTok video, Bluesky post, Reddit thread, Mastodon status, Threads post, Hacker News thread. Returns normalized structured data (author, posted_at, text, engagement counts, media URLs, replies if requested) regardless of platform. Tries strategies in order: direct API (Bluesky, Mastodon, HN, Reddit), agent-browser with modal dismissal (LinkedIn, X preview), Wayback Machine (older posts), paid APIs (ScrapeCreators / Apify — only if env keys present). Triggers on "/social-fetch <url>," "fetch this tweet," "fetch this post," "what does this LinkedIn say," "read this thread," "pull this post." Used by deep-research (citing specific posts), jab-hook (inspiration account analysis), business-brainstorm (competitor / operator commentary).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want to model personal financial scenarios — house purchase + rental income (ADU, bedroom rentals, house-hacking), renovation budgets, monthly cash flow, big-purchase decisions, savings/investment what-ifs for a household. Ships with a house scenario template; other scenarios (refi, car, education, retirement, side income) slot in as templates. Outputs markdown scenario comparison tables. Saves scenarios to ~/Documents/personal-cfo/ with an index in ~/.config/makerskills/personal-cfo/archive/. Composes with decide, deep-research (rental comps, rates), business-brainstorm, second-brain. Triggers on "/personal-cfo," "model this scenario," "house math," "rental forecast," "monthly cash flow," "what if I rent out the ADU," "compare these housing scenarios," "should we buy this house," "house-hack math," "renovation budget."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want multiple expert perspectives on a founder/operator question — a simulated board of advisors (Jason Fried, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Jensen Huang, Bob Iger, Paul Graham, Naval Ravikant, Sara Blakely). Bring a real decision — "should I raise prices?", "hire my first employee?", "raise or bootstrap?", "kill this project?" — and the council weighs in through documented frameworks, surfaces disagreements, and synthesizes a recommendation. Also use for 'maker council,' 'board of advisors,' 'what would Bezos do,' 'what would Jason Fried say,' 'channel Naval,' 'ask the council,' or how a famous founder would approach a problem. Optional live-research pass via deep-research / watch-video / last30days. Marketing questions go to marketing-skills' marketing-council. Archives to ~/.config/makerskills/maker-council/archive/. To commit to a direction, hand off to decide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want to pressure-test a potential new business, product, or side project against the serial-founder filter. Not "marketing ideas for a product" (that's marketing-skills:marketing-ideas) — this is "should this business exist + can you win it." Runs the idea through a structured framework (problem, audience, wedge, monetization, moat, portfolio fit, distribution, energy fit, opportunity cost), checks domain availability via /domain, optionally triggers /deep-research for market validation, and outputs a viability brief: build / sleep on it / pass. Archives every idea to ~/.config/makerskills/business-brainstorm/archive/ so past work is searchable. Triggers on "/business-brainstorm," "/brainstorm," "new business idea," "should I build X," "pressure test this idea," "validate this idea," "is X a good business," "what about a [type] for [audience]."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants an evidence-based research memo, literature review, market/policy/technical landscape, or a multi-source decision brief with citations, trade-offs, and a clear conclusion. Best for tasks that need synthesis across multiple external sources, iterative follow-up research, or a reusable written artifact. Do not use for quick factual lookups, single-source summaries, simple Q&A, summarizing one document the user already provided, plan-only requests where the user explicitly defers the actual research, or when the user wants a short answer with no need for cited evidence (a short but evidence-backed conclusion is still a brief memo, which this skill covers). Chinese trigger examples: "帮我调研", "深度研究", "综述报告", "技术选型分析", "竞品研究", "政策分析".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PPT 生产 Agent：理解场景 → 推荐风格 → 先出大纲 → 定义页面 → 双通路交付（PPT 内容稿 / 逐页视觉图 / 信息图组图）。当用户要做汇报、路演、培训课件、提案、咨询报告的演示文稿，或要把大纲/文章做成 slides、deck、PPT、信息图、小红书图文、可视化传播图时使用。支持指定风格或从风格库推荐，支持 image 模型逐页出视觉稿。前身为 notion-infographic（v2）并吸收 ppt-designer 的设计原则。不用于：pptx 文件的纯技术操作（拆分/合并/提取，用宿主 pptx skill）、演讲稿或文章本体的写作（用 wechat-article-writer）、需要先做研究的内容调研（先走 deep-research 再回来）、单张海报或 logo 设计。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

资深产品经理助手，提供 PRD/MRD/BRD 创作与评审、产品策略、留存增长、竞品分析、功能优先级，以及 grill-me-to-doc 逐轮访谈。用户要求“逐个问我”“先把需求问清楚”“grill me”“把想法变成产品文档”时进入 grill-me-to-doc：先读仓库证据，每轮只问一个决策，给推荐答案与理由，记录决策和未决项，支持 resume，产出结构化 PRODUCT-DOC；文档完成且用户批准前硬停止，任何时候都不写实现代码。即使未提“产品”，讨论 App 功能、增长或商业模式也应触发。不用于：单纯代码实现、系统架构深设（用 solution-architect）、需多源引用的市场调研（用 deep-research）、纯营销文案。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

专业微信公众号文章助手，支持四个独立且可组合模式：article 写正文；image-prompts 从文章生成版本化、provider-neutral 的图片提示词 manifest 与稳定占位符，但不调用生图；layout 把文章和 manifest 确定性转换为微信安全的内联 HTML；full-pipeline 串联正文、提示词/占位符和排版。用户提到公众号、微信文章、推文、配图提示词、图片 manifest、公众号排版、内联 HTML 或完整图文流水线时触发。支持企业官号、个人技术博客、活动回顾和产品评测。不用于：带引用的研究报告（用 deep-research）、PPT/组图（用 deck-studio）、英文文章、仅润色一小段。永不自动发布，永不把提示词或占位符声称为已生成图片。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill instead of WebSearch for ANY question requiring web research. Trigger on queries like "what is X", "explain X", "compare X and Y", "research X", or before content generation tasks. Provides systematic multi-angle research methodology instead of single superficial searches. Use this proactively when the user's question needs online information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct multi-round deep research on any GitHub Repo. Use when users request comprehensive analysis, timeline reconstruction, competitive analysis, or in-depth investigation of GitHub. Produces structured markdown reports with executive summaries, chronological timelines, metrics analysis, and Mermaid diagrams. Triggers on Github repository URL or open source projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional deep research report generation — multi-agent collaboration with parallel chapter writing, automatic latest-data targeting, multilingual output, and built-in quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when performing web research beyond a simple single search -- looking into topics, comparing options, investigating questions, finding recommendations, or any task where effective use of Exa, Firecrawl, and Reddit tools matters. Triggers on "research", "look into", "investigate", "compare", "find out about", "search for", "find information", "what do people think about", "what are the best", "look up", or multi-source search tasks. Also invocable explicitly by deep-research team members via the Skill tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks for "deep research", "research team", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "investigate thoroughly", "compare X vs Y in depth", or needs synthesis across multiple sources with verification. It spawns a coordinated team of researcher agents across multiple rounds, with the lead triaging findings and creating targeted follow-up tasks. Scales from Focused (2 researchers, 1-2 rounds) to Comprehensive (4 researchers, 3-4 rounds with cross-verification). Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。