「executor」の検索結果

Split a multi-call LM workflow by cognitive load, not by accuracy: let one strong model make the few reasoning decisions and a cheap model do the many mechanical executions (Aider architect+editor, DSPy optimizer-LM vs task-LM, vLLM speculative draft+target, LangGraph supervisor+worker are the same shape). Use when designing or cost-optimizing a pipeline that calls an LM many times, when deciding which steps need a strong reasoner vs a cheap executor, or when adding an escalation valve for when the cheap tier degrades. Search keywords: reduce LLM cost, cheaper model, lower token cost, model cascade, route to cheap model, strong model plus cheap model, LLM cost optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute Python code in a safe sandboxed environment via [inference.sh](https://inference.sh). Pre-installed: NumPy, Pandas, Matplotlib, requests, BeautifulSoup, Selenium, Playwright, MoviePy, Pillow, OpenCV, trimesh, and 100+ more libraries. Use for: data processing, web scraping, image manipulation, video creation, 3D model processing, PDF generation, API calls, automation scripts. Triggers: python, execute code, run script, web scraping, data analysis, image processing, video editing, 3D models, automation, pandas, matplotlib

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns and best practices for integrating ROS2 systems with web technologies including REST APIs, WebSocket bridges, and browser-based robot interfaces. Use this skill when building web dashboards for robots, streaming camera feeds to browsers, exposing ROS2 services as REST endpoints, or implementing bidirectional WebSocket communication between web UIs and ROS2 nodes. Trigger whenever the user mentions rosbridge, rosbridge_suite, roslibjs, FastAPI with ROS2, Flask with rclpy, WebSocket for robot telemetry, MJPEG streaming, WebRTC for robots, REST API wrapping ROS2 services, web-based robot control, browser robot interface, robot dashboard, CORS configuration for robots, or any web-to-ROS2 bridge pattern. Also trigger for authentication on robot web interfaces, rate limiting sensor streams, video streaming from robot cameras to browsers, or running async web frameworks alongside the ROS2 executor. Covers rosbridge_suite, FastAPI, Flask, WebSocket, and WebRTC approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides and generates LangChain4j tool and function calling patterns: annotates methods as tools with @Tool, configures tool executors, registers tools with AiServices, validates tool parameters, and handles tool execution errors. Use when building AI agents that call tools, define function specifications, manage tool responses, or integrate external APIs with LLM-driven applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transfer full task ownership to a fresh agent with a verified brief and explicit release. Use for replacing the current executor, including a directly assigned task with no work card; not for supervising a helper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Register this agent and terminal with Reach for cards, calls and wake-ups. Use when asked to join, connect, or become reachable, or when a manually opened agent lacks `SNO_EXECUTOR_ADDR`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove that a reported run caused its intended real effect. Walk the executor path from entry to effect, capture one observable per hop, and report a result a no-op could not produce.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PL (Project Lead) role sub-skill for supervising in-flight executors. Loaded ONLY through the pl core routing table; NEVER auto-load from context, never invoke directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANUAL-ONLY: load solely when the human owner types `/cos`, uses `$cos`, or asks you to act as the Chief of Staff (COS). The COS is the one agent the owner talks to; it coordinates the owner and the per-project Project Leads (PLs). A task card, charter, or dispatch makes you an executor, not COS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Carry out a released charter to a proven result: plan only as much as the work needs, do the work through the project's own workers, prove every success check with a recorded real run, get one independent review, and close honestly. Invoke explicitly as `$deliver <charter>` (Codex) or `/deliver <charter>` (Claude, Cursor), or the way your agent invokes a skill, or when a dispatch names you the executor of a charter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, revise or review a charter: the one document that tells an executor what to deliver, what is out of bounds, what the owner already decided, and how each success check will be proven. Use when work needs a written brief before someone else does it, or when asked to write, change or check a charter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagram design reference library (14 types — architecture, flowchart, sequence, state, ER, timeline, swimlane, quadrant, nested, tree, org chart, layers, venn, pyramid). In ppt-master this is consumed by the Executor when hand-authoring diagram-type SVG pages — it is NOT a standalone HTML generator here. Read for deep per-type layout conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experiment executor and monitor for academic research. 2-agent system covering code experiments (ML training, statistical analysis, ETL, simulation) and human studies (surveys, field studies, interviews). 4 modes: run (execute + monitor code), manage (track human studies), validate (statistical interpretation + reproducibility verification), plan (Socratic experiment design). Use when a researcher wants to run or monitor a research experiment, manage or resume a human-subject study, check the statistics or reproducibility of research results, or design an experiment or study, in English or Chinese (e.g., 跑實驗、管理研究、驗證結果、規劃實驗).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute approved, bounded work in an isolated implementation conversation and return a structured evidence receipt. Use with inherited history or an explicitly identified source; no particular planning, testing, or review skill is required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate approved, bounded work through a same-directory Codex App fork: create and name the execution task, ask it to run spec-executor, route decisions through Codex Task Messenger, validate the returned receipt, and archive a completed child. The source may come from any planning workflow. Requires Codex App task tools and codex-task-messenger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MEMO-ONLY prior-work overlap advisory: surfaces the two ADVISORY taxonomy signals neither a tool nor a model can decide from the paper alone — ADV-TRIVIAL-COMBINATION (standard A+B+C / 缝合 stapling) and ADV-DUPLICATE-PUBLICATION (repackaged / duplicate submission). The executor RETRIEVES candidate prior work (DBLP fuzzy-title + boolean · WebSearch · WebFetch) from the paper's own title + contribution spans in the evidence ledger; TWO fresh cross-model codex reviewers (one per axis) LAY OUT the overlap side-by-side against each anchored contribution claim. It NEVER rules 'trivial' or 'duplicate' (that is a human judgment) and absence of a match is NOT evidence of originality. Emits novelty-duplication-advisory.memo.md + an info-only findings mirror; carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS novelty-check, reframed from 'is MY idea novel' to 'here is the overlap a reviewer should weigh'. Triggers: "novelty advisory", "duplication check", "prior-work overlap", "is this stapling", "缝合", "查重", "重复发表", "duplicate submission".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Citation-integrity forensics: is every reference real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited work actually supports? Catches hallucinated references (no paper at the claimed arXiv id/DOI/venue, fabricated authors/year), metadata drift (wrong year/venue/version), and wrong-context citations (a real paper cited for a claim it never makes — or argues against). A hot zone for machine-generated papers. Decidable at L0 (text + canonical sources). Span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); the executor gathers canonical facts (DBLP / arXiv / DOI), then one FRESH cross-model thread per cited key proposes findings; reviewer != adjudicator. Emits citation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "citation forensics", "check the references", "hallucinated citations", "wrong-context citation", "verify references", "引用核对".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute programs on a compiled transformer stack machine where every instruction fetch and memory read is a parabolic attention head. Demonstrates that transformer attention + FF layers can implement a working computer. Use when user mentions "llm-as-computer", "lac", "stack machine", "compiled transformer", "percepta", "parabolic attention", "execute program", or asks to run/trace programs on the transformer executor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clerk Backend REST API explorer and executor. Browse tags, inspect endpoint schemas, and execute authenticated requests. Use when listing users, managing organizations, or calling any Clerk API endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for ephemeral WebAssembly (WASM) and isolated micro-runtime sandboxes to securely execute AI-generated code, validate database migrations in-memory, and perform sub-millisecond fuzzing / Panduan ahli sandbox WebAssembly (WASM) efemeral dan micro-runtime terisolasi untuk eksekusi kode AI yang aman, validasi migrasi database in-memory, dan fuzzing sub-milidetik.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick among candidate outputs (code, configs, plans) by running them on diverse inputs and clustering by behavioural fingerprint, rather than by textual aggregation or log-probability. Activates when an executor returns multiple plausible candidates that need disambiguation, when output-majority voting would be the default choice, or when reviewing generated code that has not yet been validated. The 2026 evidence (Semantic Voting, arxiv 2605.08680v1) is that any execution-based selector dominates output-majority voting by 19-52pp; sketch-generated inputs beat random fuzz by 11.3pp. Triggers: "pick the best candidate", "majority vote on code", "select from N samples", "validate the generated output", "behavioural verification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing asyncio Python code — async/await coroutines, concurrent I/O with asyncio.gather, task creation and cancellation, semaphore rate limiting, producer-consumer queues, async context managers, async generators, WebSocket servers, aiohttp web scraping, async database operations, run_in_executor for blocking calls, or testing async code with pytest-asyncio. Covers FastAPI and aiohttp patterns, synchronization primitives, timeout handling, and common pitfalls like event loop blocking and missing await.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a ChatGPT/Codex Plugin workflow needs deterministic computation, file processing, repository checks, package inspection, or other work that should be actually executed with host-native Python instead of answered from unverified reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。