Runs tests and handles failures. Triggered when: test execution, verification, test failures, CI checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
957 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Runs tests and handles failures. Triggered when: test execution, verification, test failures, CI checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides fault tolerance patterns for Spring Boot 3.x using Resilience4j. Use when implementing circuit breakers, handling service failures, adding retry logic with exponential backoff, configuring rate limiters, or protecting services from cascading failures. Generates circuit breaker, retry, rate limiter, bulkhead, time limiter, and fallback implementations. Validates resilience configurations through Actuator endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix misleading Flutter/Dart test failures where expected data is empty ([]) or default values instead of the mocked response, caused by stale Mockito generated mocks or missing stubs being silently swallowed by try/catch in provider/repository code. Use when: (1) Test expects non-empty data but gets [], (2) Mock stubs for a method are set up but the code under test returns fallback/empty results, (3) A PR added new methods to a service class and tests that previously passed now fail with misleading "expected X, actual: empty" assertions, (4) "Generated files are out of date" CI error alongside test failures. The root cause is MissingStubError thrown by unstubbed mock methods, caught by production try/catch blocks, causing silent fallback to empty state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Locate root causes of failing regression tests by analyzing code changes, error messages, and test dependencies. Use when regression tests start failing after code changes, investigating test failures in CI/CD, debugging flaky tests, or understanding why previously passing tests now fail. Analyzes git diffs, stack traces, test output, and dependency changes to produce structured markdown reports ranking likely causes. Triggers when users ask to find why tests are failing, debug regression failures, investigate test breakage, or analyze failing test suites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instruments programs to record execution information for deterministic replay debugging. Use when debugging hard-to-reproduce bugs (race conditions, timing issues, intermittent failures, heisenbugs), reproducing production failures, or analyzing complex execution sequences. Records non-deterministic events (I/O, threading, randomness, time) to enable exact replay of program executions. Supports Python, JavaScript, Java, and C/C++ with both custom instrumentation and existing replay tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instruments programs to capture execution traces specifically for reproducing reported bugs, enabling consistent replay and diagnosis of failures. Use this skill when you need to reproduce a bug, capture execution traces for debugging, instrument code to record program behavior, generate replay scripts for bug reproduction, diagnose hard-to-reproduce failures, or perform deterministic replay of program execution. Triggers when users ask to instrument code for tracing, capture execution traces, reproduce bugs, generate replay scripts, or enable deterministic debugging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explains runtime errors and compilation failures with actionable debugging guidance. Use when Python or Java code throws runtime exceptions (NullPointerException, TypeError, AttributeError, etc.), compilation errors (syntax errors, type mismatches, import failures), or dependency issues. Analyzes error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and provide concrete fixes with examples. Distinct from test-related errors - focuses on errors during normal code execution and build processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and explain why Isabelle or Coq proofs fail, identifying the root cause such as type mismatches, missing assumptions, incorrect goals, unification failures, or inapplicable tactics. Use when the user encounters proof failures, error messages in formal verification, stuck proof states, or asks why their Isabelle/Coq proof doesn't work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies non-deterministic or unreliable tests through static code analysis and test result analysis. Use when Claude needs to find flaky tests, analyze test reliability, or investigate intermittent test failures. Supports Python (pytest, unittest) and Java (JUnit, TestNG) test frameworks. Trigger when users mention "flaky tests", "intermittent failures", "non-deterministic tests", "unreliable tests", or ask to "find flaky tests", "analyze test stability", or "why tests fail randomly".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selectively instruments code to capture runtime data for debugging failures and bugs. Use when investigating crashes, exceptions, unexpected behavior, test failures, or performance issues. Analyzes stack traces and error messages to identify suspicious code regions, then adds targeted logging, tracing, and assertions to capture variable values, execution paths, timing, and conditional branches. Supports Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, and C/C++.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug proof failures using counterexamples from Nitpick (Isabelle) or QuickChick (Coq) to identify specification errors, missing preconditions, and proof strategy issues. Use when: (1) A proof attempt fails and you need to understand why, (2) Counterexamples are generated by Nitpick or QuickChick, (3) Specifications may be incorrect or incomplete, (4) Theorems need validation before proving, (5) Missing preconditions or lemmas need identification, or (6) Proof failures need explanation and correction suggestions. Supports both Isabelle/HOL and Coq equally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the TMDb integration tests against the live TMDb API (the Integration test plan; requires TMDB_API_KEY/USERNAME/PASSWORD). Use before a PR, or after model/fixture changes, to validate against real API responses — delegates to the tooling-runner agent (Haiku) and returns counts + failures, distinguishing genuine failures from transient live-API/env issues. For mocked unit tests, use /test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix bugs and broken behavior when there is enough evidence to act on a repair path. Use for errors, crashes, incorrect results, API failures (500, 404, 403), CORS problems, database exceptions, broken rendering, duplicated or wrong data, off-by-one mistakes, timezone/date bugs, broken forms, config-caused runtime failures, and regressions. Trigger when the user wants the bug repaired and the conversation already contains a clear failing area, a reproducible failing test, a concrete error path, or a prior diagnosis to implement. Do NOT use for new features, pure explanation, architecture discussion, broad research, or bug reports where the main need is figuring out why the behavior happens — use diagnose for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate unexpected behavior and mysterious bugs. Use when the cause of a problem is unknown and the user needs to understand WHY something is happening — symptoms like: sudden unexplained changes in metrics or behavior, works locally but not in staging/production, inconsistent or intermittent failures, correct code producing wrong results, operations succeeding but having no effect, environment-specific failures, duplicate executions, stale data, or any "why did this change?" or "why is this happening?" situation. Covers infrastructure anomalies (cache hit rates dropping, latency spikes, queue behavior shifts) as well as code bugs. The key signal is confusion about root cause, not a request to implement a known fix. Do NOT use for feature requests, known fixes, planning, or documentation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and fix mini-program failures through reproducible, evidence-driven root-cause analysis across source, state, asynchronous timing, caches, mock data, build versions, platform behavior, devices, cloud calls, and external services. Use when users report white screens, crashes, stale or jumping values, missing data, intermittent behavior, permission failures, performance stalls, device-only defects, API or cloud-function errors, source-versus-build mismatches, or regressions whose cause is not yet established. Freezes the observation environment, ranks competing hypotheses, runs discriminating checks, creates a failing regression test before repair, covers analogous states, and never hides a known failure with longer waits, swallowed errors, forced success, or cosmetic patches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit existing color usage in a codebase — find inconsistencies, hardcoded values, and contrast failures. Use when asked to "audit our color usage", "find hardcoded hex values", or "check for contrast failures".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze specific pytest failures using authoritative contracts and a cited product/test evidence chain. Use for failing test names or pytest output, distinguishing product, interface, oracle, and harness defects without automatically changing expectations or forcing an architectural redesign.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trace bugs, CI failures, and unexpected behavior from reproduced evidence to a causal mechanism and governing contract. Distinguish product, architecture, test-oracle, and harness defects; investigate intermittent failures with controlled experiments and report unresolved evidence explicitly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add controlled retries to pytest runs so agents can contain flaky tests and report final failures without rerunning whole suites by hand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses ArgoCD application sync failures using the ArgoCD REST API and Kubernetes resource diff analysis. Identifies Helm value conflicts, Kustomize overlay errors, and resource health check failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate Railway infrastructure: sign up for or sign in to a Railway account, create projects, provision services and databases, manage object storage buckets, deploy code, configure environments and variables, manage domains, troubleshoot failures, check status and metrics, set up Railway agent tooling, and query Railway docs. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Railway, signing up, creating an account, registering, logging in, deployments, services, environments, buckets, object storage, build failures, agent setup, MCP, or infrastructure operations, even if they don't say "Railway" explicitly. Also invoke this skill when the user asks to be signed up, registered, or onboarded to Railway: do not refuse — drive them through the unauthed `railway up` flow (deploys + signs up on the fly) or `railway login` (which creates new accounts on the fly).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Continuously monitor a GitHub PR for merge conflicts, CI failures, and CodeRabbit review comments, then automatically fix any issues found. Polls every 5 minutes and loops until every check is green. Use this skill whenever a PR has just been created or code has been pushed to a PR branch — it should be the default follow-up action after any PR creation or push. Also trigger on: "watch this PR", "guard this PR", "monitor CI", "keep fixing until green", "PRを監視して", "CIが通るまで 直して", /pr-guardian. When a PostToolUse hook reports that a push or PR creation just happened, proactively invoke this skill to start monitoring without waiting for the user to ask.
Diagnoses GKE persistent-storage failures — volume attach/mount errors (Regional PD on optimized VMs, fsGroup mount timeouts), disk-performance and node storage-pressure issues, slow-disk Pod-creation failures, volume-expansion problems, Local SSD / Hyperdisk Storage Pool creation errors, and Cloud Storage FUSE OOM. Use when Pods are stuck in ContainerCreating, volumes fail to attach or mount, or nodes report storage pressure. Don't use for routine storage provisioning or StorageClass/PVC authoring (see the gke-storage skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Firmware development for the 40-pin ESP32-S3-WROOM-1 camera board — the Freenove ESP32-S3-WROOM (FNK0085) and the AliExpress "ESP32-S3 CAM" / "ESP32-S3-WROOM N16R8 CAM" clones that copy its header: 20 pins a side, a 24-pin DVP camera FPC connector for an OV2640/OV3660, an on-board microSD slot on the SDMMC bus, a WS2812, two USB-C sockets (CH343 bridge and native USB), ESP32-S3-WROOM-1-N8R8 or N16R8 with 8 MB octal PSRAM. Use when working on this board or any ESP32-S3 DVP camera board: project setup, platformio.ini, the qio_opi PSRAM memory type, camera and SD_MMC pin maps, esp_camera_init failures, PSRAM not found, frame buffer allocation, SD card mount failures, which GPIOs are left once the camera is wired, strapping pins, ADC1/ADC2, flashing over the two USB ports, BOOT/RESET recovery, brownouts, or debugging why the camera, the card or the board does not work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。