4,001 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Add a new feature, put work behind a feature flag, roll something out (per organization, for everyone, cloud or self-hosted), revert or kill a feature, or make a big change to existing behavior such as a new engine. Use BEFORE writing the feature code, and when finishing or removing a rollout.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Feature planning and implementation with 4 adaptive phases (Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute). Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Writes testable requirements in EARS notation, atomic tasks, atomic Conventional Commits, and requirement traceability. Ships deterministic Python validation scripts so structural gates are enforced by code, not memory. Features an independent Verifier (author != verifier, evidence-or-zero), a discrimination sensor, a decision log (STATE.md), a test-coverage matrix, and a self-improving lessons layer. Stack-agnostic and tool-agnostic. Use when (1) planning features, (2) implementing with verification and atomic commits, (3) validating an implementation against a spec. Triggers on "specify feature", "discuss feature", "design", "tasks", "implement", "validate", "verify work", "UAT", "record decision", "pause work", "resume work". Do NOT use for pure architecture decomposition analysis or standalone technical design documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to get featured on the App Store or understand the editorial process. Also use when the user mentions "get featured", "App Store editorial", "App of the Day", "Today tab", "Apple featuring", or "how to get Apple to feature my app". For launch strategy, see app-launch. For ASO optimization, see aso-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a PRD for an AI-powered feature, covering the things normal PRDs miss. Use when asked to spec an AI/LLM feature, write a PRD for a feature that uses a model, or plan an AI capability (assistant, summarizer, generator, classifier). Produces an AI feature PRD — problem & UX of uncertainty, model approach, eval criteria, guardrails, fallback behaviour, the data flywheel, and cost/latency budget.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement feature flags for progressive feature rollout using LaunchDarkly, Unleash, or custom solutions. Control feature visibility, perform A/B testing, and enable trunk-based development. Use when implementing gradual rollouts, feature toggles, or experimentation platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract battery features for degradation analysis and health monitoring in MATLAB. Covers cycling test features, differential curves (IC/DV/DT), and measurement statistics. Use when working with battery cycling data, SOH estimation, RUL prediction, or any battery test data analysis in MATLAB. Triggers on battery* functions such as batteryTestDataParser, batteryTestFeatureExtractor, batteryMeasurementFeatures, batteryDifferentialCurves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This is an advanced version of TDbasedUFE, which is a comprehensive package to perform Tensor decomposition based unsupervised feature extraction. In contrast to TDbasedUFE which can perform simple the feature selection and the multiomics analyses, this package can perform more complicated and advanced features, but they are not so popularly required. Only users who require more specific features can make use of its functionality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to refactor Java code to adopt modern Java features (Java 8+) — including migrating anonymous classes to lambdas, replacing Iterator loops with Stream API, adopting Optional for null safety, switching from legacy Date/Calendar to java.time, using collection factory methods, applying text blocks, var inference, or leveraging Java 25 features like flexible constructor bodies and module import declarations. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for modern Java development; Apply best practices for modern Java development in Java code; Modernize Java code with records pattern matching or switch expressions; Replace legacy idioms with modern Java features; Adopt Java 8+ language features safely. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, inspect, and reuse Featuretools automated feature engineering workflows for EntitySets, DFS, feature matrices, primitive authoring, feature inspection, and selection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for Feast feature store tasks: feature repositories, definitions, CLI, retrieval, materialization, serving, RAG/vector search, integrations, and Feast contributor workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a feature implementation plan from an existing feature specification (or equivalent context) through a facilitated team conversation. Use when the user wants to plan how to implement, build, deliver, or ship a feature that has already been specified. Does not specify what the feature should do — use plan-a-feature first. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not refine or stress-test an already-written plan — use iterative-plan-review. Runs its resolution rounds to completion and holds its questions until after they finish; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Separate a messy working tree with multiple tangled features into clean, focused PRs. Use when: (1) Working tree has uncommitted changes from multiple features mixed together, (2) Need to create a PR for just one feature from a mixed working tree, (3) "git stash pop" fails with "already exists, no checkout" for untracked files, (4) Pre-commit hooks block commits due to unrelated untracked files with errors, (5) Interface changes in one feature break consumer files from another feature in the same working tree. Covers git stash workflows, branch separation, conflict resolution, and pre-commit hook workarounds. Never stack PRs — always target main.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DevOps 与站点可靠性工程 (SRE) — 平台 / 基础设施 / 可靠性工程师的认知操作系统, 覆盖软件交付 + 运维全生命周期 (CI/CD 与发布工程 trunk-based + 渐进式发布 canary/blue-green/feature flag + GitOps Argo CD/Flux / 基础设施即代码 Terraform/OpenTofu/Pulumi/Ansible + policy-as-code OPA / 容器与编排 Docker/Kubernetes + Helm/Kustomize + service mesh Istio/Linkerd / 可观测性 Prometheus + Loki + OpenTelemetry + Honeycomb + eBPF + RED/USE / SLO-SLI-error budget 与可靠性工程 Google SRE 学科 + 容量规划 + 优雅降级 / 事件管理与 on-call 事件指挥 + PagerDuty + runbook + 无指责复盘 + MTTR / 云平台与 FinOps AWS/GCP/Azure + 成本优化 + 弹性伸缩 / 平台工程与开发者体验 IDP + Backstage + golden path + Team Topologies / DevSecOps 与供应链安全 shift-left + SBOM + SLSA + sigstore + Vault / 韧性与混沌工程 fault injection + game day + 安全科学 / DORA 指标与工程效能 部署频率 + 变更前置时间 + 变更失败率 + Accelerate 研究 / 数据库与有状态运维 schema 迁移 + 备份容灾) — 不含 通用应用开发 / 纯云销售认证速成 / 'DevOps = 跑 Jenkins 的岗位' 窄化误解 / ITIL 工单文化传统运维 (旧范式仅做边界) / 把手工运维 ClickOps 当稳态 (是 toil, 本 skill 核心反模式) (DevOps & Site Reliability Engineering — the cognitive operating system of platform / infrastructure / reliability practitioners who own the full software delivery + operational lifecycle, covering (a) CI/CD & release engineering (build pipelines, trunk-based development, progressive delivery — canary / blue-green / feature flags, GitOps with Argo CD / Flux), (b) Infrastructure as Code (Terraform / OpenTofu, Pulumi, CloudFormation, Ansible, Crossplane — module design, state management, drift, policy-as-code OPA / Sentinel / Checkov), (c) containers & orchestration (Docker / OCI, Kubernetes — scheduling, networking CNI, storage CSI, operators / CRDs, Helm / Kustomize, service mesh Istio / Linkerd), (d) observability (the three pillars + beyond — metrics Prometheus / VictoriaMetrics, logs Loki / ELK, traces OpenTelemetry / Jaeger / Tempo, high-cardinality observability Honeycomb, eBPF, RED / USE methods, SLO-based alerting), (e) SLO / SLI / error budgets & reliability engineering (Google SRE discipline — service level objectives, error budget policy, toil budgets, capacity planning, load shedding, graceful degradation), (f) incident management & on-call (incident command, PagerDuty / Opsgenie, runbooks, blameless postmortems, MTTR / MTTD, error budget burn), (g) cloud platforms & FinOps (AWS / GCP / Azure well-architected, multi-region, cost optimization, autoscaling), (h) platform engineering & developer experience (internal developer platforms, Backstage, golden paths, self-service, Team Topologies), (i) DevSecOps & supply-chain security (shift-left, SAST / DAST, SBOM, SLSA, sigstore / cosign, secrets management Vault), (j) resilience & chaos engineering (chaos experiments, fault injection, game days, resilience engineering / safety science), (k) DORA metrics & engineering effectiveness (deployment frequency, lead time, change failure rate, MTTR, the Accelerate research), (l) databases & stateful operations (schema migrations, backups / DR, replication); NOT generic software development / app feature coding (是 平行学科, DevOps/SRE 关注 delivery + operability 不是 product feature), NOT pure cloud sales / certification cram without operational depth, NOT 'DevOps = a job title that runs Jenkins' 的窄化误解 (DevOps 是 文化 + 实践, SRE 是 Google 对 reliability 的工程化具体实现), NOT ITIL-heavy 传统运维 工单文化 (是 被 DevOps 取代的旧范式, 仅做边界标注), NOT manual ops / ClickOps as a steady state (是 toil, 本 skill 的核心反模式).) Master OS — automated mastery of DevOps & Site Reliability Engineering — the cognitive operating system of platform / infrastructure / reliability practitioners who own the full software delivery + operational lifecycle, covering (a) CI/CD & release engineering (build pipelines, trunk-based development, progressive delivery — canary / blue-green / feature flags, GitOps with Argo CD / Flux), (b) Infrastructure as Code (Terraform / OpenTofu, Pulumi, CloudFormation, Ansible, Crossplane — module design, state management, drift, policy-as-code OPA / Sentinel / Checkov), (c) containers & orchestration (Docker / OCI, Kubernetes — scheduling, networking CNI, storage CSI, operators / CRDs, He
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate behavioral/feature documentation for web apps using code-first analysis. Reads source code via tree-sitting to produce _FEATURES.md, with optional visual verification via browser automation. Companion to tree-sitting. Use when documenting app behavior, creating feature inventories, generating behavioral ground truth for agents, or before modifying UI code. Triggers on "map features", "document app behavior", "feature inventory", "what does this app do".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit feature engineering code for leakage, quality issues, and pipeline correctness. Use when asked to "audit our feature pipeline", "is there data leakage", or "find feature quality issues".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating a new feature development task — scaffolds a structured task file at .claude/tasks/{feature-name}.md with phased breakdown (Design, Implementation, Testing, Documentation), acceptance criteria, context preservation, and TaskCreate tracking. Activates on "create a feature task", "set up development tracking", "plan a feature implementation", or when preparing work for python-cli-architect or python-pytest-architect agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VNX feature-execution kickoff preflight. USE THIS when starting or resuming a feature or track from its plan: checking worktree/queue/staging health, finding the first promoteable dispatch, and handing off to @t0-orchestrator. Reads the feature's track + plan doc from Horizon's tracks DB (`vnx horizon`, alias `vnx objective`); the repo FEATURE_PLAN.md/PR_QUEUE.md are generic examples, not the source.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey the whole tdmcp project and produce a prioritized list of NEW features it could implement — across artist controls, CLI/DX, AI/LLM integration, and TouchDesigner depth. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm, discover, survey, list, or audit what features/tools/effects/controls/commands/prompts/capabilities tdmcp *could* add, asks 'what could we build / what's missing / what are the opportunities / ideas for the project', or wants a feature backlog or gap analysis. Also for follow-ups: re-run, refresh, update, re-survey, deepen, or re-prioritize the backlog, or survey just one surface (e.g. 'CLI ideas only'). This is the IDEATION harness — it produces a list to decide from; it does NOT build. When the user has already chosen a feature and wants it implemented/shipped/added, use tdmcp-pipeline instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply MCAF feature-spec guidance to create or update a feature spec under `docs/Features/` with business rules, user flows, system behaviour, verification, and Definition of Done. Use when the user asks for a feature spec, executable requirements, acceptance criteria, behaviour documentation, or a pre-implementation plan for non-trivial behaviour changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Top-level orchestrator for Flutter feature specification. Runs the full uninterrupted pipeline: prd → techspec → tasks in one shot. Use when the user says "spec a feature", "write a spec for", "start feature spec", "plan a feature", or wants to go from idea to implementation-ready tasks without typing three separate commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a Flutter feature Product Requirements Document through a structured clarify-plan-draft workflow. Outputs a PRD using the repository template under `.claude/tasks/<feature-name>/prd.md`. Use when the user says "create a PRD", "write requirements", "define the feature", "start a feature spec", or wants to specify a feature before techspec/tasks/start-job.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 1 of the feature-pipeline suite — stress-test a CLI command, feature, flag, or module as a developer seeing it for the first time, then file GitHub issues for every distinct finding. Use when someone says "explore X", "test X", "find issues with X", "what's wrong with X", or after /feature-pipeline init. Also triggers standalone as /fp-explore <feature> when you want just the exploration phase without the full pipeline. Reads the target feature from .fp-state.json (or the argument if provided). Completes in one bounded turn and prints the M1 stop hook so the user decides whether to continue to /fp-plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a concise feature spec for engineering handoff. Use when the user says "write a spec", "feature spec", "one-pager for eng", "spec this out", "write up this feature", "I need to hand this off to engineering", "shape this up", or wants a concise technical brief - even if they don't say "feature spec".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。