「fix」の検索結果

Learn project rules from accumulated fix patches in .unikit/code/patches/. Analyzes past mistakes, extracts prevention points, classifies each as a coding rule (→ RULES.md) or a per-skill workflow rule (→ skill-context), and proposes them for approval. Use when the user wants to turn past fixes into rules — "evolve", "evolve the rules", "learn from past mistakes", "learn from the fixes", "analyze the patches", "what rules should we add from recent fixes". Best run after several /unikit-fix sessions have left patches behind. This derives rules from accumulated patch history — to add a single rule by hand use /unikit-rules, and to promote mature RULES.md entries into the knowledge base use /unikit-memory migrate-rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Produces a diagnostic report; mk:fix owns remediation and mk:build-fix owns compile/build failures. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively suggest when the user reports errors, unexpected behavior, or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. NOT for applying fixes without investigation (see mk:fix); NOT for step-by-step evidence-based reasoning (see mk:sequential-thinking).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build error triage: detect language, load fix patterns, auto-retry. Use for 'build failed', 'fix compilation', 'type error'. Chains into mk:verify. NOT for runtime errors (see mk:fix); NOT for architectural debugging (see mk:investigate).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Tamanu pre-release verification checks: verify that hotfixes on the current release branch are merged forward to main, and that hotfixes from prior release branches are included in the current release. Use when the user wants to run "pre-release checks", verify hotfix integrity before cutting or shipping a Tamanu release, confirm a release/X.YY branch is safe to release, or check that no hotfix has been orphaned (left on neither main nor the current release). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review+fix protocol with optional pre-core git diff review and safety guardrails (unsoundness, invariants, footguns, incidental complexity). Use when prompts say "/tw-fix this PR", "fix current branch", "fix this diff", "repair CI red", or "apply a minimal patch", and when crash/corruption/invariant-break issues need correction with a validation signal. Stop only after self-review exhausts actionable changes, each full cycle reaches post-self-review rerun plus terminal diff-review closure, and two consecutive zero-edit full cycles are clean.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a fix you made for a whole class of bugs into help for others: reverse-search GitHub for people hitting the same symptom, pick the 3-5 best live threads and post one tailored answer or gist each, no copy-paste fan-out. Use after a verified class fix. Triggers: /share-fix, /sf, share the fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical patterns for writing custom MSBuild targets. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing custom target authoring anti-patterns, reviewing MSBuild target definitions for correctness, diagnosing broken SDK target chains across files (e.g., Directory.Build.targets silently redefining SDK targets), fixing targets that replace CompileDependsOn instead of extending it with $(CompileDependsOn), fixing query targets that return stale results due to Outputs vs Returns misuse, fixing missing Inputs/Outputs causing unnecessary rebuilds, fixing missing FileWrites registration. Covers DependsOnTargets vs BeforeTargets vs AfterTargets, the Build→CoreBuild three-level pattern, hooking into the build pipeline, the $(XxxDependsOn) chain-extension pattern. DO NOT USE FOR: incremental build tuning (use incremental-build), parallelization (use build-parallelism), general anti-patterns (use msbuild-antipatterns), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for managing MSBuild item groups: Include/Remove/Update semantics, item metadata, batching with %(Metadata), transforms, per-item filtering, and cross-product batching pitfalls. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing item group anti-patterns in .csproj files, reviewing item management for correctness, fixing CS2002 duplicate file warnings from SDK globbing, fixing targets that run more times than expected due to cross-product batching, fixing Include vs Update misuse on SDK-globbed items, fixing FileWrites registration for generated file clean support, moving generated files to IntermediateOutputPath. DO NOT USE FOR: target chain architecture (use target-authoring), property patterns (use property-patterns), incrementality (use incremental-build), general anti-patterns (use msbuild-antipatterns), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a GitHub issue into a tested fix on a branch with an open PR: read the issue as the contract, find the root cause, write the failing test first, fix, prove it, review the diff against the issue, push and open the PR only after GO. Merging stays with pb-ship. Use for "fix issue 42", "bug fix from this issue", "turn this issue into a PR".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document and type a Sentry API endpoint. Write or fix @extend_schema decorators, specify response TypedDicts, type request parameters, correct type drift between the declared schema and the runtime response, and validate the generated spec. Use when asked to "document an endpoint", "add OpenAPI docs", "add/fix @extend_schema", "type an endpoint response", "fix the response type", "fix type drift", "reuse a response type", "split an overloaded endpoint", "specify the response schema", "add a TypedDict response", "migrate a legacy api-docs path", "fix a parameter type", or "make an endpoint public" / "promote an endpoint" (promotion is one section here).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/review-fix をループ実行し、CONVERGED になるまで自動修正を繰り返す。スコープ引数は /review-all と同じ（wt / PR #N / pr:N / vs:<branch> / git range / ファイル列挙、デフォルトは比較ブランチとの差分）。最大イテレーション数を数値で指定可能。Use when user says 'レビュー収束まで繰り返して', 'review-fix-loop', '自動修正ループ', or '収束するまでレビュー'.

docs/PLAN 配下の計画書ファイル（tasks.json v2）のフォーマット不整合を検出・修正し、 ダッシュボードでの表示問題を解決するスキル。 スクリプトによる自動チェック（構造・整合性・パースシミュレーション）を第一手段とし、 解決しない場合は LLM エージェントが原因を調査する。 Trigger: 計画書が壊れた, プランの修正, 計画書のフォーマット直す, /dev:fix-plan, plan fix, plan broken, ダッシュボードに表示されない

AutoFixture and NSubstitute Integration Guide - Implementing Auto-Mocking. Use when you need to automatically create mock objects and simplify testing of complex dependency injection. Covers AutoNSubstituteDataAttribute, Frozen mechanism, Greedy construction strategy. Includes customized handling for special dependencies like IMapper (AutoMapper/Mapster). Keywords: autofixture nsubstitute, auto mocking, AutoNSubstituteDataAttribute, auto-mocking, Frozen, AutoNSubstituteCustomization, AutoFixture.AutoNSubstitute, Greedy, fixture.Freeze, Received(), Returns(), IMapper, AutoMapper, Mapster, mapper testing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete guide for AutoFixture and Bogus integration. Use when you need to combine AutoFixture with Bogus to generate test data that is both anonymous and realistic. Covers SpecimenBuilder integration, hybrid generators, test data factories, and circular reference handling. Keywords: autofixture bogus integration, autofixture bogus, bogus integration, Faker, EmailSpecimenBuilder, PhoneSpecimenBuilder, NameSpecimenBuilder, realistic test data, semantic data, hybrid generator, HybridTestDataGenerator, OmitOnRecursionBehavior, circular reference

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-fix issues found by code review in REVIEW.md. Spawns fixer agent, commits each fix atomically, produces REVIEW-FIX.md summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawのIssueやPRを点検するボットを運用し、報告の確認から修正ジョブの作成、権限や検証条件に沿った自動修正・マージまで扱います。

• IssueやPRの点検報告の確認
• 既存の報告から修正ジョブを作成
• GitHub Actionsの失敗調査

失敗するテストを先に実行し、最小限の実装で成功させてからコードを整理する開発手順を支援。網羅率80％以上の確認と検証結果の記録まで扱うスキル。

• テストから新機能を実装したいとき
• 不具合を再現してから直したいとき
• テストを保ちながらコードを整理

Claude Codeのファイル編集時に、Planktonで自動整形とコード検査を行う設定を支援するスキル。残った違反の自動修正や再検査、検査ルールの保護も扱います。

• 編集のたびに整形・コード検査したいとき
• 残った検査違反の自動修正を設定
• 検査設定のルール緩和を防ぎたいとき

機能追加や不具合修正などの開発を、規模に応じて調査・計画・テスト・レビューへ振り分けます。計画承認とコミット確認を組み込む、関連スキル共通の手順です。

• 機能追加と不具合修正の手順を揃えたいとき
• 変更規模に合わせて工程を選びたいとき
• 設計書からMVP開発を進めたいとき

H100やH200のGPU在庫を調べ、固定料金の見積もり依頼や調達状況を確認します。端末の認証解除と、明示的な許可に基づくノード検証にも対応します。

• H100やH200の在庫確認
• 固定料金の見積もりを依頼したいとき
• 見積もりや調達の進捗確認

Fix security vulnerabilities found by a Strix pentest (open-source CLI or app.strix.ai cloud) — triage by severity, patch the root cause rather than the symptom, and re-run Strix to prove each fix actually closes the exploit. Handles injection, XSS, SSRF, broken access control, IDOR, and other validated findings. Use after a Strix scan reports findings, or when the user asks to remediate, patch, or fix security issues from a strix_runs report, vulnerabilities.json, findings.sarif, or a cloud scan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments. This skill runs loop engineering: auto-triggers Copilot Code Review via GraphQL (no @copilot mention), triages every open thread (Copilot, humans, advanced-security) with a fix / decline / escalate rubric, dispatches parallel fix sub-agents that obey the repo build/test/lint conventions, commits per iteration, replies+resolves citing the pushed SHA, then re-triggers until HEAD is reviewed with zero threads awaiting the agent's reply (remaining open threads are explicit hand-offs to the human — escalated declines, design tradeoffs). You merge a clean PR; the bot runs it. Trigger phrases: "address copilot comments", "run a copilot review loop", "fix this PR", "iterate on copilot feedback". Repo-agnostic, gh CLI + PowerShell. Full autopilot needs repo Triage/Write; external PR authors get single-iteration mode plus manual re-trigger (UI 🔄 or substantive-commit push).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to fix, debug, or make a specific feature/module/area work end-to-end. Triggers: 'make X work', 'fix the Y feature', 'the Z module is broken', 'focus on [area]'. Not for quick single-bug fixes — this is for systematic deep-dive repair across all files and dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。