「ieee」の検索結果

Insert, format, and cross-reference academic citations in Word (.docx) documents. Supports GB/T 7714-2015, IEEE, APA 7th.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate context-aware quality checklists for code review and QA using IEEE 1028 base standards plus LLM contextual additions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format citations across academic styles (APA 7, Chicago, Vancouver, IEEE) using CSL processors and R tooling. Convert between citation styles, generate in-text citations and reference lists, and validate formatting against style guides using citeproc, knitcitations, and Quarto's built-in citation engine. Use when rendering a Quarto or R Markdown document with formatted citations, converting a bibliography between citation styles, generating a standalone reference list, or setting up citation infrastructure for a multi-document project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants to download paper PDFs by DOI(s). Triggers: "下载这个/这几个 DOI的 PDF/全文", "把这个 DOI 列表全部下下来", "批量下 dois.txt", "download paper(s) for DOI(s) …", "bulk-download from this Web of Science / WoS savedrecs export". Routes each DOI through publisher TDM APIs (Wiley/Elsevier/Springer) then OA fallbacks (OpenAlex/Crossref/Unpaywall), and — when --use-browser-fallback is set — a final Playwright pass that reuses institutional cookies for ACS/RSC/IEEE/AIP/IOP/APS/Science. DO NOT use for paper *search* (use Semantic Scholar / arXiv instead), Zotero import / metadata sync, or downloading *all references of* a single paper (use the ref-downloader skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Place pre-screened literature citations into a LaTeX or Word manuscript, or restyle the citations already in one. Three modes: (1) inline placement — inline \cite{}/\citet{}/\citep{} with a compiled references.bib, for author-date journals (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago author-date, IEEE, Vancouver); (2) footnote placement — full formatted \footnote{} or OOXML footnotes for legal and notes styles (Bluebook, OSCOLA, Chicago, APA, McGill) with Id./supra short forms; (3) restyle — convert existing footnote citations from one style to another. This skill is manual-invoke ONLY — trigger ONLY when the user explicitly runs /cite-placement or explicitly names the "cite-placement" skill. Do NOT auto-trigger on general citation, footnote, or reference requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrical and Electronics Drafter — sizing a conductor and conduit for a panel or feeder circuit against NEC ampacity and fill tables, building a schematic/elementary diagram or one-line diagram on IEEE 315/ANSI Y32.2 symbols, cross-referencing wire numbers between a schematic and a panel wiring diagram, sizing a PCB trace against IPC-2221 current tables, or QC-checking an electrical drawing set before issuance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SciPilot Skills 家族成员，负责科研数据可视化——但定位不是"画图工具"， 而是"可视化顾问"。先做数据剖析（列类型/样本量/分布/异常值/分组结构/相关性）， 再结合用户的论证目标推荐图型，主动拦截科研画图的经典错误（小样本画均值柱掩盖 分布、双 Y 轴、饼图、Y 轴不当截断、rainbow 色图、把分类点连成折线等），最后 产出 Nature / Science / IEEE / Elsevier / PNAS / 中文核心期刊级别的成图。 覆盖纯数据图：折线、柱状、散点、箱线 / 小提琴、热力图、误差棒、分布图（直方 图 / KDE）、相关性矩阵 / 散点矩阵、多面板组合。技术栈 matplotlib + seaborn + SciencePlots（静态）+ plotly（交互）。中英文双语，中文模式自动配置 Noto Sans CJK / Source Han Sans / SimHei 并修复负号方框，支持中文期刊"宋体正文 + Times New Roman 数字"混排。默认色盲安全配色 + 冗余编码 + 灰度预览。出图后做 "视觉自检闭环"：渲染 PNG 预览→程序自检缺字/文字裁切/刻度重叠→AI 读图复核遮盖 与子图对齐→回改重渲，直到通过。 当用户的任务涉及以下任何情况时主动触发：论文配图、科研画图、数据可视化、 不知道用什么图、怎么展示数据、用什么图好、期刊投稿图、figure、出版级图表、 matplotlib、seaborn、plotly、误差棒、显著性标注、色盲安全配色、矢量图导出、 中文论文图表、多面板。**即使用户只是给一批数据问"这个怎么画"或"用什么图 好"，也应使用本技能——本技能首要能力是"判断该用什么图"，其次才是绘制。** 不做示意图、流程图、架构图。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate IEEE 830 SRS from raw requirements. Use when the user says "write SRS", "generate requirements doc", "analyze requirements", "I have raw requirements from a client", or pastes a client email/chat/PRD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate IEEE 830 SRS from raw requirements. Use when the user says "write SRS", "generate requirements doc", "analyze requirements", "I have raw requirements from a client", or pastes a client email/chat/PRD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 6 of the SRS workflow. Reads approved plan files and generates a complete IEEE 830-compliant SRS — one file per section, no word limit. A full SRS may span 300+ pages across all files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 6 of the SRS workflow. Reads approved plan files and generates a complete IEEE 830-compliant SRS — one file per section, no word limit. A full SRS may span 300+ pages across all files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

学术论文参考文献管理与格式核对。输入是参考文献列表（混乱格式）、BibTeX/RIS 文件、DOI 列表、或正文+引用混合时使用。功能包括：统一格式（format）、格式检查（check）、生成 BibTeX（bibtex）、格式互转（convert）、DOI 验证（verify）、正文引用位置核对（inline）。覆盖期刊/会议/学位/标准/数据集/预发表/网页 7 种文献类型，GB/T 7714 与 APA/IEEE/Nature 多种风格。不适用于：正文段落润色（用 academic-writing）、图表生成（用 academic-figure）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert LaTeX papers between journal/conference templates for journal resubmission or template switching (e.g., Springer → MDPI, IEEE → Nature, IPOL → CVPR) through a privacy-preserving anonymized workflow. Use when the user provides a LaTeX .tex/project plus a target template directory or .tex file. Assume the input is not anonymized unless the user explicitly says it is already anonymized. Preserve privacy sentinels exactly; never open mapping.private.json except as a local script argument.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional project management skill aligned with PMBOK® 6th/7th Edition standards. Use this skill when you need to define requirements (ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148), review project plans, generate progress reports with Earned Value Management (EVM), conduct risk analysis, estimate costs, or provide project health assessments. Ideal for creating comprehensive project documentation, analyzing project performance metrics (SPI, CPI, EAC), managing risks across 14 categories, and ensuring stakeholder alignment. Triggers: "create project plan", "analyze project health", "calculate EVM", "risk assessment", "requirements definition", "progress report", "cost estimation", or requests involving PMBOK knowledge areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance on writing high-quality requirements: the requirement quality characteristics and the EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax) patterns — ubiquitous, event-driven, state-driven, optional-feature, unwanted-behaviour — for unambiguous, singular, verifiable requirements, plus defect/anti-pattern review and verification & traceability. Use when authoring or reviewing requirements. Original synthesis citing EARS (Mavin et al.) and NASA public-domain guidance; not a reproduction of ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148 or the EARS paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the systems-engineering standards landscape — ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, 24748, 29148, 42010, 15026, 24765; INCOSE SE Handbook & Vision 2035; OMG SysML; SAE/EIA 1001/649/748; ECSS space standards; NATO AAP-48; CMMI; NIST SP 800-160; and more. Contains NO source content: it lists each standard's designation, title, purpose, owning SDO, whether it's redistributable, and where to get it. Use when you need to identify or locate an SE standard — most are paywalled/all-rights-reserved and cannot be packaged, so this points you to the owner (and to the open packs where one exists).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NIST Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems (SP 1500-201/202/203, v1.0, 2017). Use for engineering and analyzing cyber-physical systems (CPS) and IoT: the CPS Framework's aspect × facet grid (nine aspects of concern examined through conceptualization, realization, and assurance facets), cross-property trustworthiness risk management (safety/security/privacy/reliability/resilience together), data interoperability (syntactical/semantic/contextual, canonical models, identifiers, provenance), the timing aspect (time-interval classes, time domains, time-aware networking) and secure/resilient time (GNSS jamming/spoofing, PTP/NTP attacks, holdover, the clock-error model and Allan/MTIE metrics), plus the use-case requirements method. Bridges IT and OT under a clock. Scope limits: a 2017 living/draft document, thin on post-2017 standards and on detailed control catalogs; it names but does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 and 15288 process text or permission-licensed third-party figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Requirements Engineering Management Handbook (DOT/FAA/AR-08/32). Use for writing requirements for real-time, embedded control systems — the avionics/medical slant — via the Handbook's eleven recommended practices: system overview and boundary (monitored/controlled variables), operational concepts (use cases), environmental assumptions, change-tolerant functional architecture (dependency diagrams), safety-driven architecture revision (FHA/PSSA/fault tree), system modes, detailed behavior and performance requirements (ideal value + tolerance + latency), the four-variable model bridge to software requirements (MON/CON/NAT/REQ, IN'/REQ'/OUT', DO-178B mapping), subsystem allocation, and rationale. Carries the Isolette Thermostat and Flight Control System worked examples. Slanted toward control systems with sensors and actuators; thin on information-system / enterprise / agile requirements, on requirements-management tooling, and on the formal-methods internals of SCR/RSML/SpecTRM (it names them, does not re-teach them). Does not reproduce the IEEE/DO-178B/ARP standards it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from FAA-HDBK-006D (2020), the FAA's System Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability (RMA) Handbook for National Airspace System (NAS) hardware and software. Use for RMA figures of merit (MTBF, MTBO, MTTR, the availability variants), the bathtub curve and probability distributions, the four-stage RMA lifecycle mapped to the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS), the six-task RMA technical-management/acquisition process, service-thread criticality and the NAS-RD severity-to-target table, the RMA analysis toolbox (RBD, FMEA/FMECA, FTA, Ishikawa, Monte Carlo, Bayesian, FRACAS, ALT, reliability-growth/recovery tests), software reliability (early prediction + reliability growth), and tailorable example RMA requirements for a Program Requirements Document. Scope limits: it is FAA/NAS-specific guidance (not a requirement, by its own statement), centred on hardware-plus-software availability — it brackets out human/service/facility/communications availability, names but does not reproduce the math derivations or external standards (MIL-STDs, IEEE 1633, RTCA DO-178C/DO-278A, SAE JA1011), is thin on detailed worked numerical examples and on safety-case method, and predates any current revision beyond 006D.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Submission-grade remote-sensing Nature/high-impact journal figure workflow for Python or R. Use whenever the user asks to create, revise, audit, or polish manuscript figures, multi-panel scientific plots, map-led composites, remote-sensing image plates, sensor/product workflow figures, validation/error/uncertainty panels, or journal-ready SVG/PDF/TIFF outputs, especially for Nature-family, Remote Sensing of Environment, ISPRS, IEEE TGRS, or other high-impact venues. Before plotting, define the figure's conclusion, evidence logic, export needs, and review risks. If the user has not chosen Python or R, ask "Python or R?" and stop. Use only the selected backend for figure generation, previewing, exporting, and QA. Supports matplotlib/seaborn and ggplot2/patchwork/ComplexHeatmap. Not for dashboards or Illustrator/Figma-first infographics. Also trigger on general academic-writing figure needs even without the word "Nature", such as making figures/plots for a paper, scientific/academic plotting, data visualization for a manuscript, and Chinese phrasings like 遥感论文配图、学术写作配图、科研绘图、科研作图、地图出图、论文图表、可视化.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。