「medium」の検索結果

Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes advisory editorial style diagnostics (sentence-length variation, configured phrase lists, vocabulary sampling) that never infer authorship or affect scoring. Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes AI content detection (burstiness, phrase flagging, vocabulary diversity). Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research what people are actually saying about a topic in the last 30 days across Reddit, X / Twitter, YouTube, Hacker News, dev.to, Medium, and other public discourse platforms. API-free; uses WebSearch with platform-targeted site operators plus recency filters. Produces DISCOURSE.md (a structured brief) and JSON output the writer can consume. Complements blog-researcher (which focuses on authority sources) with a recency-and-engagement lens. Use when user says "blog discourse", "discourse research", "what are people saying about", "research what people are saying", "voice of customer", "social listening", "30-day research", "trend research", "what's the discussion on", "real-time research", "practitioner discourse", "/blog discourse".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Constraint-based reconstruction and analysis (COBRA) for metabolic models; use when you need to simulate growth/production, analyze flux ranges, or run knockout and medium studies from SBML/JSON/YAML models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies real, evidence-audited, topic-specific research gaps in medical research by first retrieving and verifying literature from trusted sources, then mapping the current evidence landscape, rejecting pseudo-gaps, and converting only medium/high-confidence gaps into study-ready research opportunities. Always require real literature retrieval before formal gap claims. Never fabricate references, metadata, or findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transcribe audio segments to text using Whisper models. Use larger models (small, base, medium, large-v3) for better accuracy, or faster-whisper for optimized performance. Always align transcription timestamps with diarization segments for accurate speaker-labeled subtitles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

结构化压力测试一个论点（devil's advocate / 魔鬼代言人）：把论点拆成显性断言与隐性假设（A1/A2 编号）， 逐条在用户给定的证据材料里检索带出处的反方论证，标 High/Medium/Low 风险等级，补基础比率外部视角， 最后给出「可监测的证伪信号」清单；输出结构化 findings + 人读叙事双层结果。找不到反证时如实声明「未找到」， 绝不编造。复刻自 LinqAlpha（对冲基金 AI 产品）公开的 Devil's Advocate 架构，叠加 CIA 结构化分析技术与 RAND 假设规划。当用户要「压力测试 / 唱反调 / 找盲点 / 拆假设 / 挑战这个论点 / bear case / 红队这个方案 / 上投委会前过一遍 / pressure test my thesis」，或拿着投资论点、IC memo、研究结论、商业决策要人挑刺时， 用本 skill——即使用户没说出"魔鬼代言人"这个词。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor competitor signals and surface strategic implications for your roadmap. Use when asked to monitor competitors, track the competitive landscape, produce a competitive briefing, or understand what has changed in the market this week or month. Produces a structured intelligence brief with high/medium/low priority signals, roadmap implications, and a strategic landscape summary. For a single competitor announcement use competitor-signal-tracker; for a one-off deep dive use competitor-teardown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when medium-to-large changes need explicit requirements, technical design, and task planning before implementation, especially for multi-module work, unclear acceptance criteria, or architecture-heavy requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write structured strategic documents for small and medium businesses: SWOT analyses, lean business plans, OKRs, competitive analyses. Each mode has a defined structure and quality bar. Use whenever a business asks to articulate strategy, set goals, analyse competition, plan for growth, do a SWOT, write OKRs, or build a lean business plan. Produces actionable documents, not generic frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterate on a PR until actionable CI passes and high/medium review feedback is addressed. Use for PR CI failures, review feedback, or green-check loops; do not wait for human approval, draft status, or merge gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-format content adaptation. Turning one substantial piece into many derivative formats (blog series, email sequences, social posts, webinars, podcasts, video shorts) without losing the original's value or producing AI-slop variants. The discipline of adaptation per medium rather than mass-blast distribution. Triggers on content repurposing, content adaptation, cross-format content, content atomization, content multiplication, content distribution across formats, source-piece-to-derivative, video shorts from blog, email from whitepaper, podcast from article, blog series from research. Also triggers when a flagship piece is shipping but the team has not planned how to extend it across formats, when repurposing is happening but the derivatives feel mass-produced, or when AI-assisted repurposing is producing slop variants of strong source pieces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced content and topic research skill that analyzes trends across Google Analytics, Google Trends, Substack, Medium, Reddit, LinkedIn, X, blogs, podcasts, and YouTube to generate data-driven article outlines based on user intent analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses a legal argument, submission, or piece of structured reasoning from the perspective of a judge reading it cold under time pressure. Produces a structured seven-part assessment: what the case appears to be about, immediate points of confusion, what feels strong, what feels weak, what is assumed but unproved, a provisional confidence level (low/medium/high), and what would be needed to persuade. The skill does not rewrite, improve, or attack the argument — it tells you how it actually lands on a sceptical, experienced reader with no prior context. Works on skeleton arguments, witness statements, letters before action, position statements, academic articles, and non-legal structured reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want to read and extract structured notes from a book — PDF, EPUB, MOBI, markdown, .txt, pasted text, or URL to a public-domain work. Reads in chunks (by chapter when a TOC exists, by 50-page blocks otherwise), extracts per-chapter TL;DR + key concepts + quotes + action items + frameworks, and offers to capture to second-brain raw/ as a highlights- file. Four modes — notes (default, chapter-by-chapter), summary (whole-book TL;DR + 3–5 takeaways), quotes (pull-quote highlights only), study (notes + Q&A spaced-rep prep). Triggers on "/read-book," "read this book," "extract notes from this PDF," "what's in this book," "summarize this ebook," "pull quotes from this." Sibling to watch-video (same content-consumption pattern, different medium).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits skills in this repo for consistency, API drift, and structural gaps. Produces a prioritized report grouped by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low). Use when asked to "audit skills", "check the skill repo for drift", or when planning bulk skill cleanup. Read-only — does not apply fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MCP threat-model artifact for a scaffolded harness. Reports allowed/denied tools, dangerous permissions count, secrets reachability, network/shell/file-write grants, default-deny posture. Verdict: clean (exit 0) / medium (exit 1) / high (exit 2). The 'enterprise gold' artifact for PR + compliance review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a PERSONAL brand needs long-form WRITTEN content that builds authority rather than sells — LinkedIn posts, X threads, Substack and Medium essays, using PAS-Insight for founders, Story-Lesson-CTA for coaches, and Hook-List-Reveal for creators, with six hook formulas and a 1-to-5 repurpose. Trigger on 'LinkedIn post', 'thought leadership', 'write a Twitter thread', 'newsletter essay', 'Substack post', 'I want to be known for this topic'. Also use when the user has an opinion and wants it turned into a post. Not for — company brand captions, see `37-social-caption-global`; paid ad copy, see `05-ad-copy-global`; short video scripts, see `04-script-video-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform a user-uploaded photograph into one horizontal collectible memory card with a large quiet editorial illustration, six integrated journaling-sticker motifs, three small English keywords beneath the left illustration, tactile paper grain, and deliberately clumsy flat color fields. Use when Codex needs to P图, edit, redraw, stylize, or turn a travel, street, landscape, lifestyle, portrait, or pet photo into a minimalist postcard-like card or sticker-card in this visual language. Preserve recognition through one same-medium identification anchor and optionally one exact place-defining landmark text shown once; never retain an unintended photorealistic patch, signature, or watermark.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliberate-choice procedure for a medium-to-high-stakes engineering fork — when the first plausible solution (the instinct, the default next-token pull) would be costly to get wrong. Fires AUTONOMOUSLY: invoke proactively whenever a fork fits, never wait to be asked — mechanical triggers include a fix failing for the 2nd-3rd time, adding a dependency, schema/migration design, deleting or deprecating things others depend on, changing a public API, choosing an architecture or stack. Refuse the premature collapse: hold real options open (urge · contrarian · synthesis · out-of-box · intuitive dots · precedent · first-principles), ground each branch in at least one fact from outside the model (codebase, docs, benchmark, spike), future-model consequences (blast radius, reversibility, maintenance, pre-mortem), collapse by deliberate choice, then try to refute the winner before acting. Log the decision and rejected branches in docs/decision_logs/. Not for routine calls — a decision worth more than one forward pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create platform-native content that resonates with each community's culture. Use when adapting technical content for WeChat, Hacker News, Reddit, Medium, Twitter/X, Dev.to, or LinkedIn. Transforms generic writing into content that feels written BY that community, not AT them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides audit findings remediation program management including finding prioritization by severity (critical, high, medium, low), owner assignment, remediation planning, deadline tracking, verification testing, closure criteria, escalation protocols, and management reporting. Covers remediation lifecycle from finding issuance to verified closure. Keywords: audit remediation, finding management, prioritization, verification testing, closure criteria, remediation tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides privacy audit report writing including executive summary drafting, findings classification (critical, high, medium, low), evidence referencing, root cause analysis documentation, recommendation formulation, management response tracking, and report distribution protocols. Covers report structure from scope definition through appendices and sign-off. Keywords: audit report, findings documentation, executive summary, recommendations, report structure, privacy audit deliverables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create original short videos using the 异质航行｜维修出发到巨尺度揭示 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。