本文へ移動
cccskills

「overhead」の検索結果

68 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Multi-agent exploration-to-PR pipeline for safely exploring, fixing, and shipping a feature or CLI. Use when the user says: "explore X", "test and ship X", "run the pipeline on X", "run /feature-pipeline on X", "let's properly investigate X", "stress-test X and file issues", or "take X through the full pipeline." Also triggers on: "find what's broken in X", "test X end-to-end", "do a sandbox review of X", "file issues for X and fix them." Do NOT use for single-file bug fixes or one-off edits — the overhead is only justified when exploration, planning approval, and CI watching all matter. Manages state via scripts/state.sh (jq required). Five phases: LIGHTER explores → ORCHESTRATOR drafts PR → HEAVIER plans (user approves first) → ORCHESTRATOR commits → HEAVIER sandbox review → LIGHTER iterates CI → LIGHTER drift check + summary. Four mandatory stop hooks (M1–M4) gate each phase transition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree232026年10月13日 更新

Estimate the full development cost of an existing codebase from lines of code, architectural complexity, and team-composition overhead. Use for 'how much would this cost to build', 'what did this codebase cost', development-cost or build-cost estimates, calendar-time estimates, and Claude/AI ROI on a delivered codebase. Estimates by measured LOC and complexity, not by ticket volume.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LazyIsEfficient/agentic-os172026年7月17日 更新

tiny-fix

無料

Low-ceremony workflow for trivial, low-risk changes: typos, comments, CSS/styling tweaks, string changes, single-line fixes with no logic impact. Use to avoid the overhead of the full feature workflow when the change cannot break anything. If during the fix the change turns out to touch logic, security, config, or schema, stop and escalate to the feature-workflow skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

siva01c/claude-plugins162026年9月26日 更新

Read-only audit of the project's agent-tree structural overhead vs the context window. NOT for cost tracking (budget skill); NOT for read/compact decisions (mk:context-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

Runtime router for context decisions: read-more/stop/ask/assume/delegate, minimal read-set, compaction timing. Model: Write/Select/Compress/Isolate. NOT for agent-tree overhead audit (context-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

Runtime router for context decisions: read-more/stop/ask/assume/delegate, minimal read-set, compaction timing. Model: Write/Select/Compress/Isolate. NOT for .codex/ overhead audit (mk:context-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

Read-only audit of .codex/ structural overhead: 'remove X save Y tokens' vs the context window. NOT for cost tracking (budget skill); NOT for runtime read/compact decisions (mk:context-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

Runtime router for context decisions during a task — decide read-more / stop / ask / assume / delegate, pick a minimal read-set, and time compaction. Front-page mental model is Write / Select / Compress / Isolate; a lazy pattern index routes to 25 context-engineering patterns, one reference per decision. Use when context is near budget, a long session is degrading, you must choose what to read for a task, or you are deciding /compact vs /clear vs a sub-agent. NOT for structural .claude/ overhead audits (see mk:context-audit); NOT for owning persistence (see mk:memory); NOT for USD cost (see mk:budget).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

Benchmark multi-agent coordination systems with experiment design, power analysis, human rating protocols, bootstrap confidence intervals, and reproducible reporting. Use for salvage latency, recovery fidelity, coordination overhead, and protocol comparison studies. NOT for ML model benchmarking, web-product A/B testing, survey design, or general-purpose data science.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Audit one or all supported agent harnesses (claude, codex, opencode, pi, omp, antigravity, cursor, grok) for config efficiency, hook overhead, permission friction, plugin and MCP cost, skill metadata portability, dead config, and measured session friction. Use when invoked as `$optimize-harness [harness ...] [focus]`, or when the user asks to optimize or compare agent harness configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

phatblat/dotfiles122026年10月13日 更新

Marketing operations manager handling budget planning, financial reporting, meeting preparation and follow-up, vendor management, and administrative workflows for marketing and communications departments. Designed for SME leaders who need to minimize time spent on operational overhead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hartmut-ux/ai-marketing-team122026年7月2日 更新

Expert-level guidance for Flutter production applications: architecture decisions (Clean/Layered/Hexagonal/Feature-First), advanced state management (BLoC/Riverpod/GetX), performance optimization (eliminating jank, memory profiling, reducing rebuild overhead), code review with design pattern enforcement, scalability assessments, native platform integration (MethodChannel/EventChannel/FFI), complex UI challenges (custom render objects, slivers), testing strategies (unit/widget/integration/golden), CI/CD pipeline architecture, build optimization, and accessibility compliance. Triggers: 'architecture decision', 'design pattern', 'performance issue', 'code review', 'production problem', 'scaling concerns', 'best practices', 'technical debt', 'refactoring strategy'. Essential for complex enterprise apps, critical production debugging, architectural refactors, or when choosing between competing technical approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Poorgramer-Zack/dart-expert-skills72026年8月11日 更新

SharedPreferences (v2.5.5) for Flutter providing simple persistent key-value storage for non-sensitive user settings and app preferences. Use this skill when storing user preferences (theme mode, language selection, font size), app settings and configuration, feature flags or A/B test assignments, simple cache data, onboarding completion status, last selected values (filters, sort options), user consent flags, or any non-sensitive data that survives app restarts. Supports String, int, double, bool, and StringList types. NOT suitable for storing tokens, passwords, API keys, or any sensitive/encrypted data (use flutter_secure_storage instead). Ideal for quick persistent storage without database overhead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Poorgramer-Zack/dart-expert-skills72026年8月11日 更新

Hive CE (Community Edition v2.19.x) NoSQL object database for Flutter providing blazing-fast key-value and object storage with TypeAdapters. Use this skill when implementing offline-first architecture, high-performance local data caching, NoSQL document-style object stores, custom TypeAdapter serialization for complex objects, lazy loading boxes for memory efficiency, encrypted boxes (HiveAES encryption), database compaction for size optimization, storing large datasets without SQL schema overhead, implementing local-first sync patterns, or migrating from SQLite to NoSQL. Supports primitive types, custom objects, lists, and maps. Ideal for apps requiring ultra-fast read/write operations (microsecond latency), object persistence without ORM complexity, or local-first data architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Poorgramer-Zack/dart-expert-skills72026年8月11日 更新

Delegate independent research, implementation, or verification in parallel when it can save time after dispatch and review overhead, or when explicitly requested. Keep decisions and final integration in the main agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ynakatsuka/dotfiles42026年10月12日 更新

Design finalization: generates production-quality Pretext-native HTML/CSS. Works with approved mockups from /design-shotgun, CEO plans from /plan-ceo-review, design review context from /plan-design-review, or from scratch with a user description. Text actually reflows, heights are computed, layouts are dynamic. 30KB overhead, zero deps. Smart API routing: picks the right Pretext patterns for each design type. Use when: "finalize this design", "turn this into HTML", "build me a page", "implement this design", or after any planning skill. Proactively suggest when user has approved a design or has a plan ready. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "build the design", "code the mockup", "make it real".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mostafasudo/appilot32026年9月14日 更新

run-trace

無料

Append structured execution traces across operational, cognitive, and contextual surfaces with minimal overhead. Load when inspecting agent runs, logging tool calls and observations, enabling post-run debugging, or pairing with structured-planning step IDs. Also triggers on "trace this run", "log execution", "agent observability", "run log", or when fault-localize needs evidence. Default-on during multi-step plans. Traces live at .agent-loom/traces/ — git-ignored by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dvy1987/agent-loom32026年8月8日 更新

Use when a carrier asks how to calculate cost-per-mile (CPM) at the fleet, truck, lane, or driver level — separating fixed vs variable costs, allocating overhead, accounting for empty miles, and using CPM to negotiate rates, build pricing tiers, or evaluate lane profitability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

x3allamerican/skills32026年5月17日 更新

gsd-fast

無料

Execute a trivial task inline — no subagents, no planning overhead

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

stateforward/emel.cpp22026年9月5日 更新

Runs an iterative, conversational product-discovery process with a founder/stakeholder: structured interview, live low-fi wireframing, a linked feature/page node-graph built up as you go, a founder-confirmed lock-in checkpoint, then a generated PRD, a Mermaid-rendered sitemap, and a mockup with a full design system (palette, typography, dark mode). Use when building or operating an AI product-discovery chatbot, or when running founder/stakeholder discovery by hand and you need the structure (interview script, node-graph schema, PRD template, design-system handoff order). NOT for implementing the spec'd product once locked — hand off to feature-specific skills (ideal-web-app-builder, tailwind-v4-expert, color-theory-palette-harmony-expert, typography-expert, dark-mode-design-expert) for that. NOT for one-shot PRD generation without an interview loop — if the founder already has a written spec, this process is unnecessary overhead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新