「preserving」の検索結果

Translate content across languages while preserving brand voice and cultural nuance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an existing fix PR using the audited repro and full diff, preserving branch and approval rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clone the last quarter of the current conversation, discarding earlier context to reduce token usage while preserving recent work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clone the later half of the current conversation, discarding earlier context to reduce token usage while preserving recent work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Claude Ads contracts, scoring inputs, run bundles, capabilities, source freshness, safety, installation, uninstall, or release readiness. Use for ads validate, ads status, ads next, stale claims with missing tool access, maturity checks, ownership-manifest uninstall, preserving unrelated ads-* skills, checksum verification, preflight, QA, or release audits. Missing access must demote stale evidence for the run and block dependent release-current claims before recovery guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting, sending, or preserving email correspondence for an existing ClawHub content rights case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prompt- and template-complete Google Docs creation and editing with explicit-instruction-authoritative structural preservation, including semantic roles, relationships, comparison dimensions, and instructed extensions; full-topology native-copy routing; source-grounded per-tab adaptation for past/example references; style-preserving hyperlink and table edits; canonical smart-chip-first authoring for dates and relevant supported people or Google resources; a file-backed advisory trusted read before existing-document writes; automatic protected-control awareness; direct connector APIs by default; DOCX-first import only when no supplied Google Doc template/reference constrains the output; and checked-in code mode only for exact native dropdown mutation. Use when Codex must create, edit, fill, adapt, redesign, or verify Google Docs without overriding explicit user/template instructions, adding unrequested document scope, or carrying stale reference facts into a new deliverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or auditing how an agent becomes useful after launch — AGENTS.md overlays, role files, skills, rig specs, workflow specs, startup checklists, refocus messages, "rig context" surface. Covers the 4 failure modes that make startup context fail (old rig spec misses current operating mode; current agents never told about new guidance; startup file as dumping ground; orchestrator transmits implementation without preserving product intent).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring rig specs, agent specs, workflow specs, startup/context fragments, operating-mode declarations, or designing the user spec library. Covers the 4 failure modes (spec instantiates topology but not workflow/mode; spec depends on local paths and fails on another host; agents modify specs as one-off files instead of preserving reusable intent; validation proves YAML shape but not whether topology can run) and the validation-vs-runtime-realization distinction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconcile bounded Stripe payment and payout records with supplied business records while preserving object IDs, currency, time zone, and discrepancy evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add cursor-following fluid WebGPU distortion over an existing image with the Shaders library's ImageTexture and CursorRipples components. Use when a hero, gallery, or media panel needs a water-ripple mouse effect; when replacing a drifting CSS spotlight or flashlight reveal; or when a prompt says to borrow only the shader interaction from a Shaders.com reference while preserving the current brand, image, copy, and layout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reveal marked-up text word by word as scroll progress advances, while preserving semantic inline links, emphasis, responsive line wrapping, and reduced-motion readability. Use for headlines, quotes, manifestos, product statements, onboarding messages, or editorial passages where scrolling should pace comprehension rather than simulate typing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply a prompt-agnostic execution and verification loop to any substantial task while preserving the original request. Use when the user asks to fan out work, use subagents or independent reviewers, loop until done, benchmark against references, apply a harsh critic, compare candidates blind, improve an existing prompt with verification, or continue until explicit quality gates pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a visual or interaction technique you already built into a reusable web-design skill, by isolating the one mechanism that makes it work while reproducing its approved reference exactly around that focus, and packaging it with a demo that proves both the mechanism and the visual fidelity. Covers finding the mechanism, naming the technique plainly, disclosing the verified runtime and renderer, auditing reference layers, carrying real numbers instead of adjectives, preserving owned staging, keeping expensive gotchas, declaring the boundary against neighbouring skills, and browser-verifying before claiming it works. Use when a page, canvas scene, shader, scroll effect, layout system, or hover interaction turned out well and should become a skill rather than staying in one project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive spreadsheet creation, editing, and analysis with support for formulas, formatting, data analysis, and visualization. When Claude needs to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv, etc) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Reading or analyzing data, (3) Modify existing spreadsheets while preserving formulas, (4) Data analysis and visualization in spreadsheets, or (5) Recalculating formulas

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tones down visually aggressive or overstimulating designs, reducing intensity while preserving quality. Use when the user mentions too bold, too loud, overwhelming, aggressive, garish, or wants a calmer, more refined aesthetic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest attributes, Xunit.SkippableFact, xunit.abstractions/extensibility consolidation, and Xunit.Combinatorial/StaFact compatibility. Do not use for framework conversion or a runner-only migration. For xUnit v3 MTP filter syntax, also use migrate-vstest-to-mtp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert .NET tests from xUnit.net v2/v3 to MSTest v4 while preserving VSTest or MTP. Use for replacing xunit packages, Fact/Theory/InlineData/MemberData, assertions, IClassFixture/ICollectionFixture, ITestOutputHelper, TestContext cancellation, traits/Owner, skips, timeouts, and xUnit parallelization. Also use when a "convert xUnit to MSTest" request may already be migrated: inspect and report the no-op. Do not use for xUnit v2-to-v3, MSTest upgrades, NUnit/TUnit conversion, or runner-only VSTest-to-MTP migration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert .NET tests from NUnit 3/4 to MSTest v4 while preserving VSTest or MTP. Use for replacing NUnit/NUnit3TestAdapter packages, Test/TestCase/ TestCaseSource/Values attributes, constraint assertions, SetUp/TearDown, OneTimeSetUp, SetUpFixture, FixtureLifeCycle, TestContext, categories, retries, timeouts, and NUnit parallelization. Also use when a "convert NUnit to MSTest" request may already be migrated: inspect and report the no-op. Do not use for NUnit version upgrades, xUnit/TUnit conversion, MSTest upgrades, or runner-only VSTest-to-MTP migration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install, configure, update, or upgrade vendored anti-slop Oxlint plugins. Use when adding anti-slop, picking up upstream rules or fixes, or migrating an existing installation while preserving local customizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect or rewrite prose that sounds formulaic while preserving source facts, voice, and format. Use for de-slopping, humanizing, prose audits, or a final writing-quality gate. Do not use it as an authorship detector or to evade disclosure requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate any Obsidian vault as a living, self-rewriting second brain (an evolution of Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern: sources rewrite existing pages, contradictions reconcile automatically, scheduled agents maintain the vault while you sleep). Use this skill whenever the user asks Claude to read, write, update, search, or manage their Obsidian vault - including saving notes from conversation, creating daily entries, updating kanban boards, logging dev work, managing people notes, capturing decisions, tracking deals, or maintaining any vault structure. Also triggers when the user wants to bootstrap a new vault from scratch, run a vault health check, or drop a _CLAUDE.md into their vault so all Claude surfaces share the same operating rules. Includes a research toolkit (7 commands: /x-read, /x-pulse, /research, /research-deep, /notebooklm, /youtube, /podcast) for AI-powered research via Grok, Perplexity, NotebookLM, YouTube, and podcast feeds - findings save to the vault automatically following the AI-first vault rule. Use proactively whenever the conversation produces information worth preserving (decisions, people met, projects started, tasks completed, lessons learned, research findings).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely remove intermediate files from completed research sessions while preserving important data

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review or de-slop concrete changes in ccch1mneyyy/dsh-TUI at maintainer level: PR numbers or URLs, branches, commit ranges, patch files, staged or unstaged worktrees, and scoped repository-hygiene requests. Use for evidence-first correctness, contract, repository-rule, process, and behavior-preserving cleanup review, including debug residue, dead or duplicate code, speculative abstractions, stale comments or tests, and unrelated diff churn. Do not use for abstract designs with no concrete repository artifact; use audit for repository-wide assessments and vuln-check for security-only checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。