「qualitative」の検索結果

Compare evaluated runs in a retort experiment along factor dimensions. Surfaces effects of each factor, aggregates across replicates, and highlights cells that diverge qualitatively — complementing (not replacing) retort's ANOVA analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic trade idea generation framework, fundamental quantitative and qualitative screening pipeline, catalyst-driven trade structuring, macro-to-micro idea translation, 20-60 day long-short portfolio management process

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select colormaps and qualitative palettes for scientific figures using perceptual-uniformity, color-vision-deficiency safety, and luminance-monotonicity criteria. Covers Crameri scientific colormaps, viridis/cividis/magma, Okabe-Ito categorical, ColorBrewer, and the rainbow/jet critique. Use when choosing palettes for heatmaps, scatter, networks, or any encoding where color carries quantitative or categorical meaning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review EXISTING test code for quality, smells, and testability issues. Detects test smells across six dimensions — readability, reliability, diagnostic value, design, AI-generated, and coverage — analyzes testability of application code, and backs the qualitative smells with mutation testing. Use when: "review my tests," "test quality audit," "test smells," "testability analysis," "are these tests any good." Not for: generating new tests — use `ai-test-generation`. Not for: testing AI features in your product — use `ai-system-testing`. Related: unit-testing, shift-left-testing, coverage-analysis, ai-test-generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducting user research: interview guides, usability test plans, qualitative analysis, persona creation, journey mapping. Use when research design or analysis is needed; complements Echo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse text complexity across quantitative, qualitative, and reader-task dimensions with scaffolding recommendations. Use when selecting texts, assessing readability, or planning reading support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

🇺🇸 User Interview & Cold-Start Operations Playbook — Battle-tested framework from HeyGen's 937 interviews to PMF. Complete SOP for user screening, interview execution, Beta testing methodology, cold-start user operations, churn analysis, and user grading systems. 🇨🇳 用户访谈与冷启动运营实战手册 — 基于 HeyGen 937 场访谈验证的 PMF 方法论。包含用户筛选、访谈执行、Beta 测试设计、冷启动用户运营、流失分析、用户分级体系完整 SOP。 🇯🇵 ユーザーインタビュー＆コールドスタート運営プレイブック — HeyGenの937回インタビューで検証されたPMF方法論。ユーザースクリーニング、インタビュー実行、Betaテスト設計、コールドスタートユーザー運営、離脱分析、ユーザーグレーディング。 🇰🇷 사용자 인터뷰 & 콜드 스타트 운영 플레이북 — HeyGen 937회 인터뷰로 검증된 PMF 방법론. 사용자 스크리닝, 인터뷰 실행, Beta 테스트 설계, 콜드 스타트 사용자 운영, 이탈 분석, 사용자 등급 시스템. Triggers: "user interview" | "user research" | "customer discovery" | "PMF" | "product-market fit" | "beta test" | "beta testing" | "cold start users" | "cold start operations" | "churn analysis" | "user grading" | "用户访谈" | "用户调研" | "冷启动" | "冷启动运营" | "Beta测试" | "流失分析" | "用户分级"

用户访谈与需求验收框架，覆盖原始证据、方案、优先级及回访交接。HeyGen 做 937 次访谈找到 PMF 的完整方法论。覆盖访谈招募、问题设计、 访谈执行、数据合成、决策驱动。从 gingiris-user-interview 提炼。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codify project review rules as deterministic guards — ast-grep structural rules (with TDD-style rule tests) for mechanical checks, REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md for qualitative ones, wired into the project gate / wf verify. Use when the user wants to define review rules, turn a repeated review finding into a lint/guard, or set up ast-grep in a project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cyber Risk Quantification engineer for CyberRadar. Implements FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) methodology, Monte Carlo simulation for loss distribution modeling, financial impact quantification in multi-currency (SAR, USD, EUR, GBP), loss exceedance curves, risk treatment ROI calculation, insurance premium optimization, and board-ready financial risk reporting. Transforms qualitative risk assessments into monetary terms for executive decision-making. Triggers on: CRQ, FAIR, Monte Carlo, financial impact, loss modeling, risk quantification, cyber insurance, risk treatment ROI, financial risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户需要判断一家公司是否具备持久的竞争优势时激活此skill。典型触发：用户在分析某只股票/公司时问"这门生意好不好""护城河够不够深""这个商业模式能不能持续赚钱"；或用户试图从PE/财务指标出发评价一家公司却理不出头绪。 不适用于：纯财务建模（DCF计算）、已明确在能力圈外的公司（应先回能力圈框架）、短期交易择时决策。 关键语言信号："这个生意模式怎么样""为什么这家公司能一直赚钱""竞争对手能不能抢走它的市场"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates market bubble risk through quantitative data-driven analysis using the revised Minsky/Kindleberger framework v2.1. Prioritizes objective metrics (Put/Call, VIX, margin debt, breadth, IPO data) over subjective impressions. Features strict qualitative adjustment criteria with confirmation bias prevention. Supports practical investment decisions with mandatory data collection and mechanical scoring. Use when user asks about bubble risk, valuation concerns, or profit-taking timing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uses OpenSEO as the measured SEO data plane for keyword volume and difficulty, SERPs, ranked keywords, backlinks, local SEO, rank tracking, Search Console, GA4, and site audits. Use for measured SEO metrics, indexing evidence, organic analytics, local rankings, backlink profiles, or rank trackers. Prefer OpenSEO over guessed metrics when connected; otherwise continue with qualitative web research and mark numeric metrics unknown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover keyword opportunities with MEASURED volume, keyword difficulty, CPC, and intent from OpenSEO, then write them into brand/keyword-plan.md. Use this skill whenever someone asks for keyword difficulty, KD, search volume, keyword ideas with metrics, striking-distance opportunities from Search Console, or SERP-validated keyword priorities. For qualitative research without an OpenSEO connection, use mktg's keyword-research instead (metrics will be unknown). Triggers: "keyword difficulty", "search volume", "keyword opportunities", "striking distance keywords", "measured keyword research".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a research study. Use when the user says "study design", "design my research", "what research method should I use", "how do I test this hypothesis", "research plan", "methodology section", "experimental design", "survey design", "qualitative study design", "how to structure my study", "sample size", "data collection plan", or needs to plan how to test a research question or hypothesis - even if they don't explicitly say "study design".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in ODEs and PDEs covering solution methods, qualitative analysis, and applications to physics and engineering

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze PowerPoint slides qualitatively using vision AI. Arguments: <deck_path> [--render] [--slides 1,5,10]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantitative agent evaluation using 4-metric framework (correctness/step_ratio/tool_call_ratio/latency_ratio) with ideal trajectory annotation and capability-categorical taxonomy. Use when measuring agent efficiency, comparing agent variants, or gating new agents through correctness→efficiency phases. Complements harness-eval (SE benchmarks) and evaluator-optimizer (qualitative rubric).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select colormaps and qualitative palettes for scientific figures using perceptual-uniformity, color-vision-deficiency safety, and luminance-monotonicity criteria. Covers Crameri scientific colormaps, viridis/cividis/magma, Okabe-Ito categorical, ColorBrewer, and the rainbow/jet critique. Use when choosing palettes for heatmaps, scatter, networks, or any encoding where color carries quantitative or categorical meaning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from MIL-HDBK-516C (Airworthiness Certification Criteria). Use for DoD air-system airworthiness planning: tailoring a certification basis, systems engineering criteria, and domain clusters for structures, flight technology, propulsion/installation, avionics/electrical/E3/diagnostics, computer systems/software, and crew systems (including applicable UAS control-station elements). Qualitative guidance handbook — not raw contractual requirements. Does not replace service airworthiness authority policy, civil FAA certification rules as authorities, or detailed JSSG/MIL performance specs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide (NASA/SP-2011-3421, 2nd ed.). Use for quantitative PRA of aerospace and safety-critical systems: the risk triplet and scenario logic stack (MLD, ESD, event trees, fault trees, minimal cut sets), Bayesian data collection and parameter estimation, aleatory/epistemic uncertainty modeling and common-cause failure (Alpha Factor, beta-factor, CCBE), human reliability analysis (THERP, CREAM, NARA, SPAR-H), context-based software risk (CSRM), physics-based and structural/phenomenological models (stress-strength, limit states, FORM/SORM, NASGRO, range safety), uncertainty propagation and importance measures (F-V, RAW, Birnbaum, DIM), and launch-abort modeling with worked PRA examples. This is the QUANTITATIVE engine beneath NASA's risk doctrine — for the qualitative RIDM/CRM decision framework use the nasa-risk pack. Thin on programme management, organisational risk governance, and non-aerospace regulatory contexts; aerospace-focused and anchored to the 2011 second edition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a user interview topic in PostHog — pick who to target (cohort, emails, or PostHog distinct IDs), draft what to ask about, and prepare the voice-agent context plus a question list. Use when the user asks to "talk to users", "check how users feel about X", "interview some customers", "set up a user interview", "run a user-research call", "find users to ask about Y", or otherwise wants qualitative feedback through a conversation. Walks the user through targeting (cohorts-list, persons-list, or accepting emails / distinct IDs directly), captures the topic, and prompts for agent context and questions before calling user-interview-topics-create. Cohort targeting is resolved to explicit emails/distinct_ids at create time — topics snapshot their audience and do not re-evaluate cohort membership later. Do NOT trigger when the user is uploading a recorded interview audio file (that's the separate UserInterview/transcript flow) or only browsing existing topics with user-interview-topics-list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。