「quest」の検索結果

Turns a set of questions (form exports, helpdesk logs, meeting Q and A, chat threads, a plain list) plus the source documents the user supplies into a DRAFT FAQ grouped by theme: every answer quoted or paraphrased from a named source with a reference, verbatim quotes for dates, figures, eligibility and obligations, UNKNOWN where the sources are silent, a source register with precedence, a conflicts table and a routing list of unanswered questions to owners. Use when the user asks to "build an FAQ from these documents", "answer these questions from the policy", "turn the Q and A into an FAQ page", "group these questions and answer them from the guide" or "what do our documents say about these questions". Do not use for the manager FAQ of a changed HR policy, use policy-change-briefing instead; for checking whether a document's own claims are evidenced, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts one service catalogue entry (description, scope in and out, owners and support groups, service levels exactly as provided, request path, dependencies, charging, lifecycle) from the service team's notes, questionnaire answers or existing documents, with UNKNOWN and a question list for every field the inputs do not cover. Never invents a service level, owner or price. Use when the user asks to "write the catalogue entry for this service", "turn these questionnaire answers into a service description", "tidy this request catalogue item" or "check this draft entry for empty fields". Do not use for a how-to or known-error article, use knowledge-article-drafter instead; for operating procedures, use runbook-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a stuck or complex problem into the smallest sub-question that, if answered, unlocks the next step — then answer it and repeat until the path forward is clear. Load when a problem feels genuinely stuck, when reasoning keeps circling, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a Socratic frame. Also triggers on "I keep going in circles", "what is the real question here", "help me reason through this step by step", "unstick my thinking", "recursive questioning", "what is the root question". Based on the recursive Socratic questioning method (EMNLP 2023) which outperforms CoT and Tree-of-Thought on complex reasoning tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Match a user request to the right skill using trigger matching, project context, and conversation history. Score ambiguity 1–10 and resolve it using context signals or a single clarifying question. Load when project-orchestrator needs to route a request, or when multiple skills could match and the right one is unclear. Also triggers on "which skill should handle this", "route this request", "I'm not sure which skill to use", "disambiguate this", "skill routing". Called by project-orchestrator for request routing. For finding whether a skill exists for a capability, use skill-finder instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawの複数のIssueやPRについて、担当を分けて原因調査と修正、検証を進め、許可された範囲でマージや解決済み案件のクローズまで管理するスキル。

• 複数のIssueやPRの修復管理
• 既存の修正PRを仕上げたいとき
• 修正済みIssueの検証とクローズ

OpenClawへの自然な言葉の依頼をClaude Codeなどの外部コーディングエージェントへ振り分け、作業の開始や継続、スレッド内の会話をつなぐスキルです。

• Claude Codeをスレッドで開始
• 外部エージェントの作業を続けたいとき
• acpxから直接指示を渡したいとき

DiscordにつながるOpenClawのエージェントやセッションへ質問を送り、送信先を確認したうえで、セッション側の判断に任せる投稿や明示指定の投稿を扱います。

• Discord側のエージェントに質問したいとき
• 送信前に宛先を確認したいとき
• 投稿の判断をセッションに任せたいとき

機能開発や大規模なコード整理、PRレビューをCodex、Claude Code、OpenCodeにバックグラウンドで任せ、進捗監視と完了通知まで扱うスキル。

• 機能開発をバックグラウンドで任せたいとき
• 別の作業場所で大規模なコード整理をしたいとき
• コーディングエージェントにPRレビューを頼みたいとき

AIへの依頼文から目的や不足情報を整理し、作業範囲に合うECCのコマンドやスキルを提案します。診断と改善理由を添え、そのまま貼り付けて使える依頼文に書き直します。

• 曖昧な開発依頼を具体化したいとき
• 依頼文に完了条件と検証を加えたいとき
• 作業に合うECCの構成を選びたいとき

曖昧な機能要望や影響の大きい変更を、作業範囲・前提・リスクとともに整理し、期待する動作と検証方法が明確な受け入れ基準や引き継ぎ資料にまとめるスキル。

• 曖昧な機能要望を整理したいとき
• 認証変更やデータ移行の受け入れ基準作成
• 別のエージェントやチームへの実装引き継ぎ

チームの開発に合うGitのブランチ運用を選び、コミットやプルリクエストの書き方、履歴の整理、変更の衝突解消、リリース管理まで手順を整えるスキル。

• 新規プロジェクトのブランチ運用選定
• コミット文とPR説明の統一
• PR前にローカルの履歴を整理したいとき

H100やH200のGPU在庫を調べ、固定料金の見積もり依頼や調達状況を確認します。端末の認証解除と、明示的な許可に基づくノード検証にも対応します。

• H100やH200の在庫確認
• 固定料金の見積もりを依頼したいとき
• 見積もりや調達の進捗確認

A multi-frame gamified mobile-app prototype — three phone frames on a dark showcase stage. Frame 1: cover / poster, Frame 2: today's quests with XP ribbons and a level bar, Frame 3: quest detail. Vivid quest tiles, level ribbon, bottom tab bar. Use when the brief asks for a "gamified app", "habit tracker", "RPG-style life app", "level-up app", "daily quests", "XP / streak app", or "ELI5-style explainer app".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify a material user-owned product decision before substantive implementation commitments. Use only when request and named/governing evidence still leave a choice that would materially change scope, platform support, user-facing surface, data/API contract, domain values, project placement, or cross-system architecture; also use when a truncated request omits such a choice. On the initial turn, inspect only named or governing requirements evidence, then ask directly without loading: prefer structured input; ask one blocking outcome question or at most three coupled questions; wait. After the answer, load the body before write or delegation. Do not use for implement/build/fix/debug/refactor work when expected behavior is settled, plan/design deliverables owned by Plan, complexity/greenfield/integration alone, agent-owned technical choices, locally discoverable facts, reversible defaults, permission to begin, or stop/no-tool turns. Never re-ask supplied facts or turn clarification into refusal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk through a Data Subject Access Request (or deletion, portability, correction request) and draft the response — verify identity, locate data system-by-system, assess exemptions, draft the acknowledgment and substantive response letters. Use when a DSAR comes in, the user pastes an access/deletion/portability/correction request, or says "DSAR came in", "access request", "right to be forgotten", or "someone wants their data".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upload one Kleros-ecosystem file per paid request to IPFS through the Kleros x402 gateway for $0.01 USDC on Base mainnet. Use for dispute evidence, MetaEvidence JSON, court/dispute/arbitrator policies, Curate item metadata, juror justifications, or any artifact a Kleros contract or subgraph will reference by CID. Trigger when the request mentions Kleros, court, arbitrator, dispute, juror, Curate, Proof of Humanity, evidence, meta-evidence, justification, explicitly names this gateway or skill, or asks to test or validate it. Do NOT use for generic IPFS/CID requests without Kleros context; recommend a general-purpose pinning service. Each request accepts exactly one file: different bytes require separate paid uploads, while identical bytes should reuse one CID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activation requires either supplied .NET coverage reports/percentages/line, branch, or condition metrics, or an explicit request to collect .NET coverage for analysis. USE FOR: interpreting that evidence, including Cobertura data, partial conditions, plateaus, target arithmetic, project-wide coverage-backed CRAP, and coverage-backed refactoring safety. Analyze supplied reports directly without rerunning tests or installing tools. DO NOT USE FOR: requests with neither coverage evidence nor explicit coverage-collection intent, including hypothetical change-survival questions (use test-gap-analysis); CRAP or refactoring safety for one named target (use crap-score); or requests owned by test-tagging, find-untested-sources, test-anti-patterns, run-tests, or code-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review GitHub pull requests with detailed, multi-perspective code analysis using parallel subagents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a PR, asks for code review on a pull request, mentions "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", or references a PR number or GitHub PR URL. Do NOT use for local uncommitted changes — this skill only reviews pull requests on GitHub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate educational practice questions from lecture notes to test student understanding. Use when users request practice questions, exam preparation materials, study guides, or assessment items based on lecture content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts or opens a GitHub pull request, runs changed-area preflight checks, and commits validated preflight repairs, and routes Azure DevOps repositories to the backlog-management pull request protocol. Use when a user asks to prepare, create, or update a pull request on GitHub or Azure DevOps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stress-test a decision or claim through a sharp, fair Q&A — the questions a good lawyer or skeptical friend would ask before you commit. Use when asked to cross-examine me, ask me hard questions about this, interrogate my plan, or make me defend this. Produces a sequenced line of probing questions (from clarifying to challenging to the killer question), space to answer, and a debrief on where your answers were strong, evasive, or exposed a gap — so weaknesses surface in private before they surface in public.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Request a reasonable accommodation at work or in education — frame it around the barrier and the adjustment (not your diagnosis), cite the right process, and navigate the back-and-forth constructively. Use when someone says 'I need a workplace accommodation', 'request reasonable adjustments', 'ADA/Equality Act accommodation', or 'how do I ask for accommodations for my disability/condition'. Produces the request letter, a barriers-and-adjustments map, disclosure guidance, and a plan for the interactive process. Not legal advice — routes to the formal process and to advocacy where needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate educational practice questions from lecture notes to test student understanding. Use when users request practice questions, exam preparation materials, study guides, or assessment items based on lecture content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, review, or improve Core Data persistence in apps that have not adopted SwiftData. Use when working with NSManagedObject subclasses, NSFetchedResultsController for list-driven UI, NSBatchInsertRequest / NSBatchDeleteRequest / NSBatchUpdateRequest for bulk operations, NSPersistentHistoryChangeRequest for persistent history tracking and multi-target sync, NSStagedMigrationManager for staged schema migrations (iOS 17+), NSCompositeAttributeDescription for composite attributes (iOS 17+), or when integrating Core Data threading with Swift Concurrency. For Core Data + SwiftData coexistence or migration, see the swiftdata skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。