Used for command-shape or live NV-Reason-CXR chest X-ray reasoning smoke tests. Not for diagnosis or clinical reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
604 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Used for command-shape or live NV-Reason-CXR chest X-ray reasoning smoke tests. Not for diagnosis or clinical reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run inference on Fireworks AI — direct, through the Leanmcp AI Gateway proxy (aigateway.leanmcp.com) for observability, or via LiteLLM / the OpenAI SDK / raw HTTP. Covers the endpoint-and-key matrix for each route, serverless vs dedicated deployments and their cold starts, browsing and filtering the model catalogue, reasoning models that return content:null with the answer in reasoning_content, function calling, concurrency and load testing, and runner scripts where many models share one protocol with a --use-proxy toggle. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Fireworks, FIREWORKS_API_KEY, api.fireworks.ai, fireworks_ai/ model ids, accounts/fireworks/models/..., a Fireworks deployment id, the Leanmcp gateway or LEANMCP_API_KEY, app.leanmcp.com observability, or gpt-oss / kimi / glm / qwen / deepseek served on Fireworks; wants to route LLM calls through a proxy for logging or cost tracking; is debugging empty responses, 404s, scope errors, cold starts, or "the gateway isn't working"; wants to pick a Fireworks model with tool calling; or wants to sweep several models over one benchmark. Reach for it even on vague asks like "why is this model returning nothing" or "set up inference for these models" when Fireworks is in play.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply general knowledge reasoning across diverse domains — trivia, commonsense inference, analogy, and factual question answering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform closed-book frontier reasoning — complex problem solving from internalized knowledge without external retrieval or tool use.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies cognitive science frameworks for creative thinking to CS and AI research ideation. Use when seeking genuinely novel research directions by leveraging combinatorial creativity, analogical reasoning, constraint manipulation, and other empirically grounded creative strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a complete marketing campaign brief from a launch goal, ICP, and product context. Pure reasoning skill. Outputs channel plan, messaging angles, content types, timeline, and success metrics. Designed for seed/Series A founders and small GTM teams who aren't professional marketers but need to run focused campaigns. No scripts — pure reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses a legal argument, submission, or piece of structured reasoning from the perspective of a judge reading it cold under time pressure. Produces a structured seven-part assessment: what the case appears to be about, immediate points of confusion, what feels strong, what feels weak, what is assumed but unproved, a provisional confidence level (low/medium/high), and what would be needed to persuade. The skill does not rewrite, improve, or attack the argument — it tells you how it actually lands on a sceptical, experienced reader with no prior context. Works on skeleton arguments, witness statements, letters before action, position statements, academic articles, and non-legal structured reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement adaptive learning with ReasoningBank for pattern recognition, strategy optimization, and continuous improvement. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing workflows, or implementing meta-cognitive systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search past reasoning for relevant decisions and approaches
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement adaptive learning with ReasoningBank for pattern recognition, strategy optimization, and continuous improvement. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing workflows, or implementing meta-cognitive systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement adaptive learning with ReasoningBank for pattern recognition, strategy optimization, and continuous improvement. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing workflows, or implementing meta-cognitive systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides Gemini CLI delegation workflows for large-context analysis and complex reasoning using Gemini 3.0 Flash and Gemini 3.0 Pro models, including English prompt formulation, execution flags, and safe result handling. Use when the user explicitly asks to use Gemini for tasks such as broad codebase analysis, fast iterations with Gemini 3 Flash, or deep architectural reasoning with Gemini 3 Pro. Triggers on "use gemini", "delegate to gemini", "run gemini cli", "ask gemini", "use gemini for this task", "use gemini 3 flash", "use gemini 3 pro".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Makes agent reasoning visible, surfaces tradeoffs, and fades help so humans build judgment. Use when reviewing or learning from agent-written code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract abstract mathematical models from imperative code (C, C++, Python, Java, etc.) suitable for formal reasoning in Coq. Use when the user asks to model imperative code in Coq, create Coq specifications from imperative programs, extract mathematical models for verification, or translate imperative algorithms to Coq for formal reasoning and proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate Claude AI into applications with the Anthropic SDK. Use when a user asks to add Claude to an app, use Claude for text generation, build a chatbot with Claude, use Claude's long context window, implement tool use with Claude, stream Claude responses, use Claude for code generation, document analysis, or reasoning tasks. Covers Messages API, streaming, tool use, vision, system prompts, extended thinking, and batch processing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement adaptive learning with ReasoningBank for pattern recognition, strategy optimization, and continuous improvement. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing workflows, or implementing meta-cognitive systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement adaptive learning with ReasoningBank for pattern recognition, strategy optimization, and continuous improvement. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing workflows, or implementing meta-cognitive systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。