「repositories」の検索結果

Audit and improve CLAUDE.md files in repositories. Use when user asks to check, audit, update, improve, or fix CLAUDE.md files. Scans for all CLAUDE.md files, evaluates quality against templates, outputs quality report, then makes targeted updates. Also use when the user mentions "CLAUDE.md maintenance" or "project memory optimization".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct external recon using OSINT techniques to map an organization's external attack surface without touching target systems, gathering DNS records, certificate transparency logs, search results, social media, code repositories, and breach databases into a target profile. Use for the passive info-gathering phase of a pentest, external footprinting, or collecting employee/email intel for a social engineering campaign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cmux package architecture, refactor layering, dependency inversion, file organization, DocC documentation, package design discipline, testability, and Swift 6 concurrency rules. Use before adding or meaningfully rewriting Swift files, Swift packages, coordinators, services, repositories, or public package APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Trigger only when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do not trigger for general maintainer lists or non-security ownership questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KubeSphere OpenPitrix application management Skill. Use when users ask about KubeSphere App Store, OpenPitrix, Helm/YAML application templates, application repositories, app versions, app releases, categories, review states, repository sync, or troubleshooting application installation and upgrade issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Docker Hub operations -- manage organizations, repositories, teams, members, and webhooks via the Composio MCP integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Docker Hub tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): repositories, images, tags, and container registry management. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Trigger only when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do not trigger for general maintainer lists or non-security ownership questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with GitHub and GitLab repositories through resident gh/glab/git auth on the agent computer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce this repository's TypeScript backend module architecture standards. Use whenever creating, modifying, refactoring, or reviewing backend code under `server/`, including routes, services, modules, repositories, shared backend code, and backend tests. Do not apply these rules to frontend code or non-backend scaffolding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compiles any research input — PDF papers, GitHub repositories, experiment logs, code directories, or raw notes — into a complete Agent-Native Research Artifact (ARA) with cognitive layer (claims, concepts, heuristics), physical layer (configs, code stubs), exploration graph, and grounded evidence. Use when ingesting a paper or codebase into a structured, machine-executable knowledge package, building an ARA from scratch, or converting research outputs into a falsifiable, agent-traversable form.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates Spring Boot 3.x configurations, creates REST controllers, implements Spring Security 6 authentication flows, sets up Spring Data JPA repositories, and configures reactive WebFlux endpoints. Use when building Spring Boot 3.x applications, microservices, or reactive Java applications; invoke for Spring Data JPA, Spring Security 6, WebFlux, Spring Cloud integration, Java REST API design, or Microservices Java architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

必须用于通过对话管理当前专家实例的 Skill，包括查找、检查、安装、导入、更新、编辑、列出、恢复或删除。支持 skillhub.cn/skills/... 页面 URL、SkillHub CLI、本地及上传文件、SKILL.md、ZIP/TAR、Git/GitHub 和普通下载 URL；也用于把 PDF、Markdown、文档、代码、图片等任意资料整理成新 Skill。Must use for conversational Skill management from files, URLs, Git repositories, archives, or SkillHub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI namespace attacks through --extra-index-url resolution ordering, NuGet feed priority exploitation when multiple package sources are configured without clear directives, Maven and Gradle repository ordering where artifact resolution traverses repositories sequentially, Go module proxy abuse through GOPROXY misconfiguration, Ruby gems namespace squatting, and Docker image tag confusion with unqualified image references. Provides complete proof-of-concept methodology using safe callbacks including DNS canary via interactsh or Burp Collaborator and HTTP beacon with no destructive payload. Covers reconnaissance techniques for discovering internal package names through GitHub repository analysis, error message harvesting, JavaScript source map extraction, lock file parsing, job postings mentioning internal tools, and package manifest inspection. Directly references and builds upon Alex Birsan's seminal 2021 dependency confusion research. Each ecosystem section includes registry-specific exploitation mechanics, configuration vulnerabilities, and defensive countermeasures for engagement reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced API exploitation methodology focused on business logic abuse and sophisticated attack patterns that bypass traditional security controls. Covers business logic bypass through API call chaining and workflow manipulation. Addresses GraphQL-specific attacks including batching for credential brute-force, query depth exploitation, and introspection abuse. Includes pagination exploitation for data exfiltration, webhook hijacking for SSRF and data interception, and resource exhaustion through algorithmic complexity attacks. Covers race conditions in API transactions using parallel request techniques. Provides comprehensive JWT manipulation including algorithm confusion, kid injection, jku/x5u abuse, and claim tampering. Details API key leakage detection across source repositories, client-side code, and error messages. Covers undocumented endpoint discovery through predictable naming, debug routes, and source map analysis. Tooling includes Arjun, ParamSpider, jwt_tool, and GraphQL Voyager. Designed for authorized penetration testers targeting business logic layers that automated scanners miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Use when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do NOT use for general maintainer lists, non-security ownership questions, or threat modeling (use security-threat-model).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the connected iPolloWork GitHub service to inspect repositories, pull requests, issues, reviews, and Actions, then route focused work to the review, CI, or publish skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when LoopX must manage a multi-PR or multi-MR delivery program across one or more repositories: inventory current change requests, reconcile new/merged/closed or retargeted work, preserve requirement and dependency priorities, maintain a roadmap document, or monitor material lifecycle/check/review changes over time. Use provider-neutral snapshots and one grouped continuous monitor; do not use for deep per-PR code review, approval, commenting, or merge actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert .NET projects and solutions (.sln, .slnx) to NuGet Central Package Management (CPM) using Directory.Packages.props. USE FOR: converting to CPM, centralizing or aligning NuGet package versions across multiple projects, inlining MSBuild version properties from Directory.Build.props into Directory.Packages.props, resolving version conflicts or mismatches across a solution or repository, updating or bumping or syncing package versions across projects. Also activate when packages are out of sync, drifting, or inconsistent -- even without the user mentioning CPM. Provides baseline build capture, version conflict resolution, build validation with binlog comparison, and a structured post-conversion report. DO NOT USE FOR: packages.config projects (must migrate to PackageReference first) or repositories that already have CPM fully enabled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and optimize application data access that uses Entity Framework Core (EF Core). Use for EF Core performance and correctness reviews of services, repositories, imports, and background jobs: slow or memory-heavy queries, excessive round-trips, hidden SaveChanges, premature materialization, dynamic query construction, result-graph tracking, bulk writes, DbContext lifetime or overlapping operations, search semantics, paging, raw SQL, and model/index coverage. Use whether or not EF Core owns the schema. For EF Core, not Dapper or raw ADO.NET.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Protocol for sending queries, delegating tasks, and sharing context between independent Squad instances across different repositories

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic Review Pipeline Orchestrator - Coordinates systematic literature review automation Manages the complete 7-stage PRISMA 2020 pipeline from research question to RAG system Delegates to specialized agents (I1, I2, I3) while enforcing human checkpoints Use when: conducting systematic reviews, building knowledge repositories, PRISMA automation Triggers: systematic review, PRISMA, literature review automation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured literature review using a parallel fleet of Librarian agents. Searches top journals, working paper repositories (NBER, SSRN, IZA), and traces citation chains from key papers. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants to survey existing research on a topic — not to find datasets or write a paper. Triggers include: "review the literature", "find related papers", "what's been done on X", "search for papers on", "do a lit review", "find papers about", "what papers should I cite", "who has written about this", "survey the literature", "find prior work on", or any request to locate and summarize academic publications on a topic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for reviewing configured repositories' pull requests. Use for manual or scheduled PR triage, approval, or merge decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。