「research artifacts」の検索結果

Review criteria for the nw-diverger-reviewer — validates JTBD rigor, research quality, option diversity, taste application correctness, and recommendation coherence in DIVERGE wave artifacts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when opening a pull request and the diff is cluttered with .planning/ commits. Creates a clean branch filtered of GSD planning artifacts so reviewers see only code changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a GSD run failed, stalled, or produced the wrong result and the cause is unclear. Reads git history and .planning/ state and phase artifacts to diagnose root cause, then writes a report to .planning/forensics/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when onboarding someone to a finished milestone or preparing a team review. Reads ROADMAP, REQUIREMENTS, CONTEXT, SUMMARY, and VERIFICATION artifacts into one MILESTONE_SUMMARY in .planning/reports/, then offers Q&A.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when generating spec artifacts (research.md, requirements.md, design.md, tasks.md), formatting agent output, structuring phase results, or when any Ralph agent needs guidance on concise, scannable output formatting. Applies to all Ralph spec phase agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft non-prose visuals artifacts (timeline, figure specs) for a survey, grounded in evidence and using citation keys from `citations/ref.bib`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-merge paper-voice gate: inspect the reader-facing draft for planner-talk and axis-label artifacts, then route fixes to the actual source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch and normalize supported source-tutorial inputs into local, traceable text artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project completed stage Artifacts into a concise human-review block in `DECISIONS.md`; use before a Workflow checkpoint, not for Workflow routing or approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author the research plan — fundamentals first, trade ideas last; Constitution Check evaluated twice; Deviation Register with mandatory Expiry; emits the four side artifacts (brief/entities/reproduce/contracts). Technical (market_data_stage: early) theses MUST emit the entities.md bars schema before implement (Q42).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run outcome-focused Firecrawl workflows that produce deliverables such as research reports, literature reviews over published papers, SEO audits, QA reports, lead lists, knowledge bases, website design systems, and other structured web-data artifacts. Use when the user wants Firecrawl to complete a business, marketing, product, or creative workflow rather than merely scrape a page or integrate API calls into code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run outcome-focused Firecrawl workflows that produce deliverables such as research reports, literature reviews over published papers, SEO audits, QA reports, lead lists, knowledge bases, website design systems, and other structured web-data artifacts. Use when the user wants Firecrawl to complete a business, marketing, product, or creative workflow rather than merely scrape a page or integrate API calls into code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert run artifacts into calibrated interpretation and next decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user mentions Zenodo, depositing or publishing research artifacts (datasets, software, papers, posters) to Zenodo, minting a DOI for a dataset/code release, uploading files to a Zenodo record, creating a new version of a Zenodo deposit, or searching Zenodo records. Covers the full Zenodo REST API workflow — create deposition, upload files via the bucket API, set metadata, publish, version, and search — for both production (zenodo.org) and sandbox (sandbox.zenodo.org).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Register a plan artifact via the MCP backlog server. Use when you produce a document or report that downstream agents or worktree-isolated environments need to retrieve — feature-context, codebase-analysis, architect, T0-baseline, TN-verification, or research artifacts. Triggers include "store an artifact", "register a plan artifact", "write a report to the backlog", "upload artifact content".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lets agents operate Google NotebookLM/Gemini Notebook through a Python API, CLI, skill, MCP server, or REST server to create notebooks, add sources, ask cited questions, generate artifacts, and download exports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits websites for AI search visibility (GEO/SEO) and generates deployable artifacts (llms.txt, schema JSON-LD, robots.txt). 7-dimension scorecard tailored by site type and size, grounded in Princeton KDD 2024, Toronto 2025, and ICLR 2026 research. This skill should be used when optimizing for ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, or other AI search engines. Also triggered by queries about AI search optimization, generative engine optimization, llms.txt, AI crawler configuration, schema markup for AI, citation optimization, or Google AI Mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs Claude Code prompts and CC environments. Produces CLAUDE.md drafts, agent topologies, scope-authorization frameworks, halt triggers, Skills/hooks/MCP plans, chat-to-CC handoff specs, and EXECUTION_PLAN.md remediation plans. Five modes: DESIGN (new CC deployments), EVOLVE (updates from friction), RESEARCH (evaluate a CC tool/pattern), TEMPLATE (reusable artifacts), REMEDIATE (consume hygiene findings → produce + execute plan). Do NOT use REMEDIATE for direct cleanup (Cat 1–10 — use rootnode-repo-hygiene Phase 2). Do NOT use for hygiene scanning (rootnode-repo-hygiene), chat prompts (rootnode-prompt-validation), or chat Projects (rootnode-project-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when capturing research artifacts to a vault or knowledge base, formatting source citations, saving synthesized connections from a writing project, or enriching a knowledge base with produced content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing or publishing a local project as a clean GitHub repository. Covers new repositories, private staging releases, public README cleanup, updates to existing remotes, and research-code packaging without datasets, checkpoints, papers, or generated artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 1 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use this skill whenever you need to gather, consolidate, or refresh raw evidence for named skills in the registry. Trigger phrases: "collect evidence", "populate the data lake", "gather sources", "run ev-collection", "Phase 1", "compile the evidence index", "refresh the unified lake", "aggregate skill evidence", "build the evidence database". Also invoke as the first step before running ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, or ev-link-validation — nothing downstream is meaningful without a fresh, compiled index. Covers GitHub repo links, stargazer signals, YouTube showcases, arXiv papers, peer reviews, benchmark results, blog/newsletter posts, and self-attestation artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close out a review/meta branch that lands an evidence-ingest / curation batch: create the named nodes, ingest verified evidence, appraise Trust Magnitude, calibrate stars, wire suites, correct upstream naming, stage ONLY the intended artifacts (dropping CRLF churn and blocking leaks), validate, and open the PR. Use when a curation/ingest batch is verified and ready to land, or when the user says "close the review/meta branch", "land the ingest batch", "wrap up the intake PR", "/gaia-review-meta-close". Wraps the deterministic hygiene in scripts/review_meta_close.py and gates the judgment calls (calibration, Origin, suite promotion, naming, merge) behind explicit human checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。