「retrospective」の検索結果

Generate a backward-looking retrospective of vault activity (addressed callouts + Log entries) over a time window (1w / 1m / 1q), overlay with newsflow + earnings transcripts + price action, and rank trade ideas by the gap between official narrative and market reaction. Output is an immutable Research note. Use when user says "retro", "retrospective", "what did I do this week/month/quarter", "review activity against market", or "recommend trades from recent research".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware with per-person contributions, praise, and growth areas. Use when asked for weekly retro, what shipped this week, or engineering retrospective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware: breaks down per-person contributions with praise and growth areas. Use when asked to "weekly retro", "what did we ship", or "engineering retrospective". Proactively suggest at the end of a work week or sprint. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are conducting a post-engagement retrospective for a penetration tester.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

コーディングの作業ログを振り返り、ファイルの探しやすさ、自動チェック、指示文、ツール利用などを点検して、次回に向けた環境改善案を重要度順に整理するスキル。

• 時間がかかった開発作業の振り返り
• 繰り返すミスの自動チェックを探したいとき
• エージェント向け指示を整理したいとき

Run the ECC engineering process retroactively against an existing project slice. Audit current state, reconstruct past decisions, produce a four-axis gap register (thinking, coding practice, missing features, technology selection), then execute fixes forward through the plan-TDD-review pipeline. Use when adopting ECC mid-project, taking over an inherited codebase, or asking what was missed and what would have been built differently from day one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly engineering retrospective. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ranks any list of impediments and their countermeasures using a value-stream scoring model (ROI, Cost to Implement, Ease of Deployment, Risk Factor) and a fixed prioritization formula. Use when someone asks to prioritize, rank, sequence, or triage impediments, countermeasures, remediation items, risks, findings, gaps, action items, or backlog entries; or mentions value-stream prioritization, A3 / lean countermeasure ranking, ROI vs. effort scoring, or building a remediation / improvement backlog. Works with GHQR findings, audit results, retrospective action items, risk registers, architecture review gaps, or any free-form `{impediment, countermeasure}` list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-session environment retrospective driven by OMC's own instrumentation — trace timelines, friction reports, logs, and plan notepads. Every finding lands on the surface that owns the fix (deterministic check, steering volume, tooling, or information access); nothing is written without user approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy and configure Zeek (formerly Bro) to passively analyze network traffic, generate structured connection/DNS/HTTP/SSL/file logs, detect anomalous behavior, and write custom scripts for organization-specific threats. Use for passive monitoring at network choke points, feeding SIEM/threat hunting with protocol metadata, or retrospective log analysis during incident response; not a substitute for inline IDS/IPS or host agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects prompt injection using regex signature matching, heuristic scoring for structural anomalies, and DeBERTa-based transformer classification, flagging direct injections (system-prompt overrides, role-play escapes) and indirect injections (encoded payloads, obfuscation) per OWASP LLM Top 10 (LLM01:2025). Use for input validation layers in chatbots/agents/RAG pipelines, or for retrospectively classifying injection attempts in logs or incident investigations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/em:postmortem — Honest analysis of what went wrong. Use after a failed launch, missed quarter, or bad hire to run a blameless 5-Whys retrospective with a change register — e.g. dissecting why the Q3 release slipped six weeks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:post-mortem <decision> — Honest retrospective on an executed decision, scored against original assumptions and dissent. Closes the strategic sprint loop. Use when a decision hits its 90-day review checkpoint or its kill criteria trigger — e.g. scoring last quarter's pricing change against its pre-committed success metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

任务完成后的反思与经验沉淀。仅在任务非平凡且出现调试、失败修复、反复试错、明显误判或可复用教训时使用；简单执行、查询、常规 CI 通过等无新增经验的任务可跳过。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate concise daily standups, reflection prompts, and weekly retrospectives for individuals or teams. Use for planning a day, surfacing blockers, reviewing user-provided entries, or drafting a check-in without assuming prior history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

工作流组合：当一个任务明显需要多件思想武器接力时，提供四种标准组合模式（新项目启动、复杂问题攻坚、方案迭代优化、阶段复盘），定义调用顺序、每步交接物和终止条件。触发信号包括从零启动、疑难攻坚、迭代优化、阶段复盘；单一 skill 就够用时不触发。 English: Workflow patterns. When a task clearly needs several skills in sequence, pick one of four standard patterns (project kickoff, hard-problem assault, iterative improvement, stage retrospective) that fix the order, the handoff artifact between steps, and the stop condition. Skip when a single skill suffices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

批评与自我批评：在工作完成、阶段验收、收到批评或同类错误反复出现时，对成果和过程做诚实、具体、基于事实的审视，输出可执行的改进项，并处理外来批评而不辩解。触发信号包括 review、复盘、审查、"帮我看看有没有问题"、"你确定吗"；任务刚开始或只是单步查询时不触发。 English: Criticism and self-criticism. After delivery, at a review checkpoint, on receiving criticism, or when the same mistake recurs, examine the result and the process honestly and concretely, produce actionable fixes, and accept valid criticism without defensiveness. Triggers include review, retrospective, audit, "check this for problems", "are you sure"; skip at the start of a task or for one-step lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Team minutes, retros, and decision history to keep: meeting minutes, scrum/sprint records, retros, decisions, and follow-up history. Use when the user says: operating-rhythm, operating rhythm, meeting minutes, meeting history, scrum record, sprint planning, sprint review, sprint retrospective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run a launch retro / post-mortem", "compare launch results vs targets by channel", or "decide what to keep or kill for the next launch"; produces a structured D1/W1/M1 retrospective — a per-channel actual-vs-target table (UTM-attributed own analytics as the truth column, platform self-reported numbers as reference, every figure labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated), a 5-Whys chain on the single largest miss, keep / kill / change decisions per channel, 3-5 actionable learnings for the next launch, and an outcome snapshot submitted to the launch registry. Not for return math (CPA / ROI) — use roi-calculator; not for the stakeholder-facing report writeup — use report-generator; not for a metric deep-dive — use performance-analyzer. 发布复盘/渠道归因/5-Whys/keep-kill

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs retrospective or prospective clinical cohort study protocols for biomedical and clinical research. Always use this skill when the user needs a cohort-based study plan rather than a general study idea, evidence summary, or mechanistic experiment design. Focus on cohort appropriateness, enrollment logic, baseline time-zero definition, follow-up structure, endpoint definition, variable collection, confounding control, and a coherent primary statistical analysis line. Do not invent data availability, follow-up completeness, outcome ascertainment quality, sample size adequacy, or causal interpretability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

For a repository in the babysitter-users catalog, locate its babysitter processes and any committed runs (.a5c/runs/<runId>/) and perform a retrospective on a chosen run -- what went well, what failed, process suggestions, quality of effect design, breakpoint patterns -- mirroring the /babysitter:retrospect workflow but applied to an external repo. Invoke when asked to "retrospect on repo X's run", "analyze how someone else used babysitter", or "review an external babysitter run".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a 复盘 (fupan), the structured project review widely used in Chinese companies: review the goal, assess the result, analyse why, and draw rules for next time, with a blame-free tone and owned actions. Use when asked 帮我做复盘, 项目复盘, 活动复盘, 复盘会怎么开, or a fupan or retrospective in Chinese. Produces the 复盘 document in Chinese with goal versus result, root causes split into controllable and uncontrollable, lessons stated as reusable rules, and an action list with owners and dates, plus a meeting agenda.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a retrospective on a coding session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CP-7 retrospective: audit checkpoints, evidence quality, action items, and harvest candidates. Closes the V-model cycle and feeds the next run. Use via /retro after ship, escalate, or significant session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。