「reviews」の検索結果

Own concrete MSBuild ItemGroup and item-expression questions. USE FOR: Include, Remove, Update, item identity and metadata, transforms, filtering, batching, duplicate or overlapping items, and reviews that verify whether those operations are correct. Generated items stay in scope when the central defect is item identity, metadata, batching, duplicate declarations, or glob/Remove/Update semantics. For a generated artifact missing from compilation or output, wrong target timing/path, or FileWrites clean tracking without a broader item-semantics defect, use including-generated-files. The item operation may be broken, suspected, or already correct. Exclude property-only issues, general incrementality with no item question, broad reviews with no concrete item concern, and non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VS-Enhanced Literature Review Strategist - Comprehensive support for multiple review methodologies Full VS 5-Phase process: Prevents Mode Collapse and presents creative search strategies Supports: Systematic Review (PRISMA 2020), Scoping Review (JBI/PRISMA-ScR), Meta-Synthesis, Realist Synthesis, Narrative Review, Rapid Review Use when: conducting any type of literature review, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, finding prior research Triggers: literature review, PRISMA, systematic review, scoping review, meta-synthesis, realist synthesis, narrative review, rapid review

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "triage launch feedback", "cluster reviews, comments, and board posts into themes", or "set up a you asked, we shipped loop"; produces a feedback theme digest (frequency, severity, representative quotes per theme), an open→planned→started→completed/declined status loop with duplicate-merge and notification rules, shipped-change announcement material, and a compliant social-proof harvest protocol (never incentivized store reviews). Not for repurposing or amplifying the harvested proof — use content-amplifier; not for executing testimonial outreach threads — use outreach-manager. 反馈分诊/状态环/社证收割/评测合规

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches the app being cloned and reads what its real users say in public reviews (App Store, Google Play, G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, Reddit, Hacker News, its own feature-request board), then ranks what they hate, what is missing and what is unsolved, turns it into a fix plan for the clone and a positioning angle you can sell. Every quote is real, verbatim and linked. Use when the user says "what do people hate about X", "read the reviews", "how do I make mine better", "find the gap", "what features are missing", "how do I position this", "make it sellable", or after /replica-diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to improve their app's star rating, increase ratings volume, optimize when and how they prompt users for a review, or recover from a bad rating period. Use when the user mentions "app rating", "star rating", "review prompt", "SKStoreReviewRequest", "In-App Review API", "ask for review", "low rating", "rating drop", "get more reviews", or "recover from 1-star". For responding to reviews, see review-management. For overall ASO health, see aso-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Single entry point that routes any ASO, App Store, Google Play, app marketing, paid UA, monetization, retention, reviews, ratings, market-intel, or app-analytics question to the correct specialist skill in this library. Use FIRST whenever the user mentions an app, App Store, Play Store, keywords, ranking, downloads, revenue, subscriptions, screenshots, icon, reviews, competitors, charts, in-app events, launch, press, or ads — but the right specialized skill is not obvious. Triggers: "/aso-router", "/aso-skill", "/aso", "aso help", "help me with my app", "I need ASO", "which skill should I use", or any ambiguous app-marketing request. Skip this router only when the user explicitly invokes a specific skill (e.g. /aso-audit, /keyword-research).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests f...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users design and facilitate product reviews that shift from status updates to strategic deep-dives, ensuring high-quality craftsmanship and organizational alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewer pool, the public posting of reviews and decisions, and how acceptance criteria weigh the interaction contribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scrape product reviews from G2, Capterra, and Trustpilot using Apify. Single script with platform dispatch. Use when you need to monitor competitor reviews, track product sentiment, or gather customer feedback from review sites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scrape product reviews from G2, Capterra, and Trustpilot using Apify. Single script with platform dispatch. Use when you need to monitor competitor reviews, track product sentiment, or gather customer feedback from review sites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and reviews SwiftUI views with modern MV architecture, state, composition, isolated previews, and migration guidance. Covers @Observable ownership, @State/@Bindable/@Environment wiring, view decomposition, ViewModifiers, environment values, .task loading, iOS 26+ handoffs, Writing Tools, clipboard availability, and performance. Use when structuring SwiftUI state, managing @Observable, composing views, previewing meaningful UI states, or correcting SwiftUI patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amazon product differentiation strategy tool. Analyze competitor weaknesses, extract pain points from negative reviews, identify unique selling points from positive reviews, and generate actionable differentiation strategies. Progressive L1-L4 analysis depth. No API key required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up systematic review monitoring across e-commerce platforms. Track new reviews, detect negative review spikes, monitor competitor reviews, and automate review response workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review strategy for TikTok Shop — encouraging reviews, responding, leveraging UGC, social proof

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check AI-generated marketing content and reviews for required disclosures under the EU AI Act, FTC rules and platform AI-label policies. Use when labelling AI ads, deepfakes, chatbots, influencer posts or testimonials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run reputation programs: reviews, sentiment, brand safety. Crisis → crisis-response; one review → review-response. "get more Google reviews"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for both analyzing existing research assets AND gathering new research from online sources. For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger when the user requests a review of frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Support both pending-change reviews and focused file reviews while applying the checklist rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write professional, empathetic responses to App Store reviews that build trust and turn critics into fans. Use when responding to negative reviews, drafting templates for common review types, or improving review management strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。