「risk」の検索結果

Expert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT incident classification or reporting, threat-led penetration testing (TLPT), ICT third-party risk management, Register of Information, contractual provisions with ICT providers, ICT concentration risk, oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers (CTPPs), or any DORA RTS/ITS obligation. Also trigger for: "DORA gap analysis", "DORA readiness", "Art. 6 ICT risk framework", "Art. 17 incident reporting", "Art. 26 TLPT", "Art. 28 third-party policy", "Art. 30 contractual provisions", "Register of Information CIR 2024/2956", "critical TPSP designation", "DORA vs NIS2", "DORA simplified framework", or EBA/ESMA/EIOPA digital resilience guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) advisor covering all four functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST AI RMF, AI risk management, AI trustworthiness, GOVERN function, MAP function, MEASURE function, MANAGE function, AI RMF Playbook, AI risk profiles, responsible AI, AI bias management, AI transparency, AI explainability, AI reliability, AI safety, NIST AI 100-1, AI risk assessment, AI incident response, or alignment to EU AI Act, ISO 42001, or NIST CSF via AI RMF. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any NIST AI RMF or AI governance risk question should use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify AI systems under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and determine compliance obligations. Use when asked to assess AI risk level, check if an AI system is prohibited, determine high-risk status, identify GPAI model obligations, map provider/deployer responsibilities, or build an AI Act compliance roadmap. Covers the full classification decision tree (Prohibited → High-Risk → Limited → Minimal → GPAI), obligations by role (provider, deployer, importer, distributor), compliance timelines, and DACH-specific considerations (German works council, BaFin, BSI, BNetzA). Triggers on phrases like "classify this AI system", "is this high-risk under the AI Act", "AI Act risk assessment", "EU AI Act compliance", "prohibited AI practice", "GPAI obligations", "AI Act timeline".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and operationalize implementation readiness for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act Annex III, including provider and deployer obligations, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration. Use when users say things like “we classified this as high-risk, what now?”, “build an EU AI Act readiness plan”, “assess our Annex III compliance gaps”, “what do providers/deployers of high-risk AI need to implement?”, “prepare for conformity assessment”, or “create a high-risk AI implementation roadmap.”

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create YOUR personal guarantee on top of the product's guarantee for risk reversal. Triggers on: "create a guarantee", "guarantee for my affiliate", "risk reversal", "money back guarantee", "what guarantee can I offer", "reduce buyer risk", "guarantee copy", "how to guarantee", "affiliate guarantee", "personal guarantee", "risk-free offer", "satisfaction guarantee", "results guarantee".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the security slice). Use when the user mentions 'AI risk,' 'AI governance,' 'NIST AI RMF,' 'AI compliance,' 'ML governance,' 'model risk management,' 'AI fairness,' 'AI bias,' 'algorithmic accountability,' 'AI Bill of Rights,' 'EU AI Act,' 'AI transparency,' 'model card,' 'AI red team,' 'AI safety,' 'responsible AI,' 'model drift,' 'concept drift,' 'AI monitoring,' 'AI incident,' or needs to assess or govern an AI / ML system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and search for similar utility/invention patents based on product information. Trigger when users mention utility patent detection, patent infringement risk, patent similarity search, patent screening, invention patent search, patent risk assessment, TRO (Temporary Restraining Order) risk analysis, utility patent, invention patent detection, patent infringement risk, patent search, TRO risk, Ruiguan. Even if the user does not explicitly say "utility patent", trigger this skill whenever their need involves checking whether a product may infringe existing utility/invention patents before selling in a target market.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Churn risk identification and intervention — scans health signals for at-risk accounts, classifies risk level (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM), and produces an intervention sequence per risk type. Use when asked to "find at-risk accounts", "who might churn", "build a churn prevention plan", "identify churn signals", or "rescue this account".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Risk Assessment & Position Sizing — analyzes volatility, drawdown, correlation, liquidity, smart contract, regulatory, concentration, and unlock risks with crypto-specific position sizing calculators and a composite Risk Score (0-100, higher = safer)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes structural interest rate exposure with fixed/floating mismatch, basis risk, and cap/floor adequacy assessment. Use when modeling structural rate risk, analyzing basis risk, or evaluating interest rate hedging needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates settlement risk in cross-border transactions with time zone analysis, CLS participation, and Herstatt risk mitigation. Use when managing settlement risk, analyzing CLS eligibility, or evaluating cross-currency settlement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates geopolitical risk impact on investment portfolios with sanctions exposure, conflict risk, and supply chain disruption analysis. Use when analyzing geopolitical risk, assessing sanctions impact, or evaluating political event exposure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and maintain a project Risk Register per PMBOK 8 Risk Performance Domain. Identify risks, assess probability and impact, define response strategies, and track residual risk. Use throughout the project lifecycle — not just at planning. Do not use for operational incident response or security vulnerability scanning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Allocate testing effort based on risk and failure likelihood using Google's SET/SWE/TE model. Use when user says "risk-based testing", "where should I focus testing", "test coverage strategy", "prioritize what to test", "high risk areas", or needs to decide how to distribute QA effort across a codebase - even if they don't explicitly say "risk-based".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI compliance analysis for EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, OECD, financial services regulations (SEC, FCA, FINRA, DORA, MiFID II), and other frameworks. Use when asked to generate a compliance checklist for an AI tool or use case, determine if a risk assessment is required, score an AI tool's risk level, identify where an AI tool or use case could run afoul of regulatory requirements, perform a gap analysis, recommend remediation steps, assess a vendor, draft an acceptable use policy, map training requirements, or review jurisdiction-specific AI rules. Triggers on phrases like "compliance checklist", "risk assessment", "risk score", "does this comply", "EU AI Act", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF", "AI governance", "gap analysis", "vendor assessment", "acceptable use policy", "MNPI", "AI training requirements", or any request to evaluate an AI tool or use case for regulatory compliance or risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a RAID log (risks, assumptions, issues, dependencies) line by line and returns a DRAFT review pack: which entries are stale, overdue, duplicated, ownerless, incomplete or misfiled, why, and a proposed update per line as current text against proposed text with the decision the project manager must take. Never re-rates, closes, merges or edits the log. Use when the user asks to "review the RAID log", "clean up the risk log", "health-check the RAID log before the steering meeting", "which risks are stale", "find duplicate risks" or "refresh the issue log". Do not use for setting up a new RAID log or logging a single new risk, issue or decision, use project-status-tracker instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculate portfolio risk metrics including VaR, CVaR, Sharpe, Sortino, and drawdown analysis. Use when measuring portfolio risk, implementing risk limits, or building risk monitoring systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert risk manager specializing in comprehensive risk assessment, mitigation strategies, and compliance frameworks. Masters risk modeling, stress testing, and regulatory compliance with focus on protecting organizations from financial, operational, and strategic risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculate portfolio risk metrics including VaR, CVaR, Sharpe, Sortino, and drawdown analysis. Use when measuring portfolio risk, implementing risk limits, or building risk monitoring systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, scoring, or auditing third-party SaaS / vendor relationships — running a vendor scorecard with industry tuning, tracking SLA compliance with credit-claim flags, classifying third-party risk across 4 risk vectors, preparing a tier-1 vendor review, or auditing the SaaS portfolio. Forks context so large vendor catalogs (50-500 line items) and SLA logs don't pollute the parent thread. Triggers on "vendor SLA", "vendor scorecard", "third-party risk", "TPRM", "vendor review", "supplier performance", "vendor health check", "renewal review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deeper risk assessment for a single feature or product area when the launch review found something that needs more than a line item. Structured analysis: what could go wrong, how likely, how bad, what mitigates it. Use when user says "deep dive on this risk", "risk assessment for [feature]", "what could go wrong with", or when launch-review flags a novel issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check the live status of the Strait of Hormuz from the Hormuz Strait Monitor dashboard: open, restricted, or closed status, tanker transits vs normal, stranded vessels, Brent price impact, war-risk insurance levels, cargo throughput, tanker freight rates, diplomatic developments, and global trade impact. Use this skill whenever the user asks about the Strait of Hormuz or the Persian Gulf in the context of oil, shipping, or geopolitical risk — whether Hormuz is open, chokepoint or transit disruption, Gulf tanker traffic, war-risk premiums, Middle East shipping routes, or energy supply-chain risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive market environment analysis and reporting tool. Analyzes global markets including US, European, Asian markets, forex, commodities, and economic indicators. Provides risk-on/risk-off assessment, sector analysis, and technical indicator interpretation. Triggers on keywords like market analysis, market environment, global markets, trading environment, market conditions, investment climate, market sentiment, forex analysis, stock market analysis, 相場環境, 市場分析, マーケット状況, 投資環境.