「termine」の検索結果

Build animations in React Native and Expo, making the decisions in the order that determines whether they feel right — should it animate, which thread it runs on, which properties, spring or timing, how the gesture hands off, how it degrades. Writes the implementation with Reanimated, Gesture Handler, Expo Router and expo-haptics. Use when animating anything in an Expo app, adding gestures, sheets, screen transitions, press feedback or haptics, or fixing motion that stutters on device. For web animation use `animate`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determine if proposed changes require an RFC. Use when planning significant changes, before starting major work, or when asked whether an RFC is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gets new users from signup to first real value — signup flow, onboarding, time-to-value, and the early experience that determines whether someone becomes a user or a lapsed account. Use this to design or fix signup and onboarding, diagnose why signups do not convert to active use, reduce time-to-value, or decide what a new user must accomplish first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans and scripts short-form and long-form video, and designs the packaging — titles, thumbnails, and openings — that determines whether it gets watched. Use this to script a video, plan a series, fix retention or click-through problems, design thumbnail and title concepts, or turn written content into video. For a YouTube channel specifically — idea selection, retention teardowns, and channel-level strategy — use `youtube-producer`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and improves organic search performance — technical health, site architecture, internal linking, structured data, and the content decisions that determine what can rank. Use this to run an SEO audit, diagnose why pages are not ranking or were deindexed, plan a site's URL and navigation structure, add structured data, or prioritize which SEO fixes are worth doing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determines when and how revenue is recognized — performance obligations, contract terms that change the answer, and the deal structures that create accounting problems. Use this to work out how a contract should be recognized, review a non-standard deal before it is signed, understand deferred revenue, or spot terms that would delay or reverse recognition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determine the next version, update the marketing site, and run the full release pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculating powerlifting scores to determine the performance of lifters across different weight classes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "plan team structure", "determine hiring needs", "design org chart", "calculate compensation", "plan equity allocation", or requests organizational design and headcount planning for a startup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "calculate TAM", "determine SAM", "estimate SOM", "size the market", "calculate market opportunity", "what's the total addressable market", or requests market sizing analysis for a startup or business opportunity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users determine when to hire growth talent, which profiles to prioritize, and how to structure the team for maximum leverage across the user journey.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to inspect, list, extract, unpack, or repack Bethesda BA2/BSA archives; determine archive format/version/compression; or build archive assets for an MO2 overlay. Triggers - "unpack BA2", "extract BSA", "pack archive", "inspect archive", "bgs-archive".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate 3-5 messaging variants for a value proposition, design structured A/B tests, and analyze results to determine which framing resonates most with ICP. Tests can run via LinkedIn organic posts, cold email subject line splits, or both. Pure reasoning for variant generation and analysis — the user deploys the tests through their own tools. Use when a team can't decide between messaging angles and needs data, not opinions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Call copy number variants with the GATK best-practices workflows — the somatic CNV pipeline (CollectReadCounts, DenoiseReadCounts with tangent normalization, ModelSegments, CallCopyRatioSegments) and the germline GATK-gCNV pipeline (DetermineGermlineContigPloidy, GermlineCNVCaller cohort/case mode, PostprocessGermlineCNVCalls). Covers panel-of-normals construction, AnnotateIntervals/FilterIntervals, allelic-count integration, and QS-based filtering. Use when integrating CNV calling into a GATK variant pipeline, calling rare germline CNVs from an exome cohort, deciding between the somatic and germline GATK workflows, or diagnosing why tangent normalization removed a real event or why gCNV output has low precision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the agent to reference official MathWorks Documentation and Help. Determine correct function syntax and workflows from user guides when deeper context is needed. Minimize iterations and repetitive trial and error. Use this skill to: Identify correct syntax and configuration details. Retrieve relevant, version-specific (or release-specific) information from official documentation. Consult user guides when conceptual or workflow context is needed. Apply best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

United Arab Emirates Governance, Risk & Compliance advisor — a jurisdiction-first compliance router. In the UAE, WHERE an organization sits determines its law: mainland (Federal PDPL, Decree-Law 45/2021 — executive regulations still pending), DIFC (DP Law No. 5 of 2020 as amended 2025, with a private right of action), ADGM (DP Regulations 2021), CBUAE-licensed financial institutions (consumer-data residency, outsourcing approvals), healthcare (ICT Health Law data localization), and government/CNI (UAE IA Regulation, Cyber Security Council; Dubai ISR, ADHICS). Use for any UAE / Dubai / Abu Dhabi / Emirates compliance question: UAE data protection, DIFC or ADGM privacy, free-zone vs mainland obligations, health-data residency, CBUAE cyber and outsourcing rules, market entry ("expanding to the UAE"), breach notification, gap assessments, and mapping UAE requirements to ISO 27001 / NIST CSF / SOC 2. Trigger for any UAE privacy, cybersecurity, or regulatory question even if no framework is named.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Saudi Arabia Governance, Risk & Compliance advisor — a compliance router that first determines WHICH Saudi regulations apply (NCA ECC-2:2024, Saudi PDPL, NCA Cloud Cybersecurity Controls, SAMA Cyber Security Framework, CST cloud framework, DCC/OTCC/TCC), then guides framework-specific compliance. Use for any Saudi Arabia / KSA compliance question: NCA Essential Cybersecurity Controls, SDAIA and the Personal Data Protection Law (نظام حماية البيانات الشخصية), PDPL breach notification and data transfers, SAMA compliance for banks/insurers/fintechs, cloud data residency in the Kingdom, CST CSP registration, government/CNI cybersecurity obligations, market-entry compliance ("expanding to Saudi Arabia"), gap assessments, and mapping Saudi requirements to ISO 27001 / NIST CSF / SOC 2. Trigger for any KSA, Riyadh, Vision 2030 compliance, NCA, SDAIA, SAMA, or Saudi data protection question even if no framework is named.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a judge/grader and human-labeled data, and wants to measure how well the judge agrees with humans, detect systematic biases, determine whether automatic evaluation can replace human review, or build a human-reduction roadmap. Also use when the user mentions calibration, TPR/TNR, judge validation, inter-rater agreement, Cohen's kappa, bias detection, or "is my automatic evaluation trustworthy." Merges the calibrate and align functions into one skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determines whether a specific AI-agent action, output, recommendation, or proposed commitment remains admissible for execution or institutional reliance under current authority, delegated scope, evidence, facts, policy, risk, escalation, and revocation conditions. Use this Skill before an enterprise or regulated AI agent executes, updates records, triggers workflows, communicates externally, or before an institution relies on an agentic output in a way that creates consequence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list, UK OFSI, UN list, PEP list, adverse media hit, etc.), or asks to clear a screening hit / reduce false positives / determine whether a flagged name is actually the listed party. Use even when the user describes the task casually — "is this person actually on the sanctions list", "did we get a real match", "clear this alert", "I have a hit on X" — these are all screening-adjudication tasks. Produces a deterministic determination with full audit trail (structured JSON + human-readable narrative). Designed for use by compliance analysts and screening systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screens a dismissal — proposed or already done — against the unfair dismissal framework for England & Wales, and shows where it is exposed. Structures the qualifying-service question, the automatically-unfair categories (no qualifying period), and a Burchell / Polkey / band-of-reasonable-responses analysis for a solicitor to verify — it does not determine fairness. Surfaces specific procedural risks. Use when the user says 'is this unfair', 'screen this dismissal', 'ordinary unfair dismissal', 'automatic unfair dismissal', or wants a structured fairness review before or after dismissal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

a skill that determines whether a given subject matter qualifies for copyright protection under EU law by applying the Cofemel two-step test (concept of work + originality), grounded in fifteen CJEU judgments (including the most recent Mio/Konektra and Calinescu) and the four EU directive provisions on originality. It argues from one of two positions: pro-rightsholder (establishing that the work is original) or pro-alleged-infringer (contesting work status or originality via the four exclusion grounds — technical function, rule-dictated outcome, sweat of the brow, idea/functionality). It includes sector-specific modules for photography, software/GUI, sporting events, databases, applied art, functional texts, derivative works/critical editions, and multimedia works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a security incident, data breach, or actively exploited vulnerability raises the question "who must we notify, where, and by when?" Screens one incident across the EU reporting regimes — NIS2, GDPR, DORA, and the Cyber Resilience Act — determines which duties fire for each involved entity's roles, resolves the receiving authority per regime and member state from served national law, and produces a deadline table in which every duty, authority, and deadline is cited from official publisher text fetched live through the Ansvar Gateway MCP connector. Never answers from model memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite incident response and legal compliance guidance for data breaches under GDPR Articles 33 & 34. Use when: (1) User reports a data breach or security incident — including "is this even a personal data breach?" triage, (2) User asks about breach notification obligations or deadlines, (3) User mentions "72 hours", Art. 33, Art. 34, or notification requirements, (4) Discussion involves security incidents affecting personal data, (5) User needs breach risk assessment using ENISA methodology, (6) User mentions "Data Breach" or "Incident" or "Data Leakage" or "Ransomware" or "Exfiltration", (7) User needs to determine Controller vs Processor obligations, (8) Cross-border breach scenarios requiring Lead SA determination, (9) User needs a mitigation playbook or immediate response recommendations, (10) User needs audit-ready breach documentation (.docx) or an EDPB-template-aligned breach notification / evidence file — including follow-up and withdrawal notifications, (11) Breach involves an AI system requiring AI Act Art. 73 serious incident screening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。