「waste」の検索結果

Lightweight outcome tagging for meetings — won, lost, stalled, great, or noise. Use whenever the user says "tag this meeting", "mark that as a win", "that one was a loss", "tag yesterday's call as stalled", "mark this great", "that meeting was noise", "label that meeting", or any time they describe a meeting outcome in passing. Tagging takes 5 seconds and unlocks /minutes-mirror correlation analysis — the more meetings get tagged, the smarter mirror gets at telling the user what behavior patterns lead to wins. Surface this skill any time the user mentions a meeting result, win, loss, or wasted time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when targeting Resources, Conservation & Recycling or deciding whether a resource-efficiency/circular-economy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the materials-and-waste circularity contribution bar, material-flow-analysis expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to audit SpriteKit game code for common issues — physics bitmask issues, draw call waste, node accumulation, and action leaks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit model delegation and subagent effectiveness for a session — which models handled which subagent types, per-type success rates and average durations, and wasted delegations (heavy models on trivial work or types that consistently fail) — using the Agent Monitor workflow intelligence API. Use when reviewing how a session delegated work across models and subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the martech stack for gaps, overlaps and wasted spend, with a consolidation plan. "audit our martech stack"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Status match and status challenge rules for airlines and hotels. Covers free direct matches, paid concierge via statusmatch.com with fees, card-granted status, and critical lifetime/once-per-N-years restrictions that make wasted matches expensive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen a Medicare/Medicaid claims corpus for fraud, waste, and abuse and produce ranked, fully-cited investigation referrals for an SIU / program-integrity team. Use when asked to run a fraud sweep, screen claims for FWA, find billing anomalies, or generate investigation referrals over a claims dataset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate material procurement lists from CWICR data. Calculate quantities with waste factors, group by supplier categories, and create purchase orders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assist with quantity takeoff using CWICR data. Calculate quantities from dimensions, apply waste factors, and suggest related work items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cost discipline for recurring /loop runs. A loop multiplies per-iteration cost by iteration count, so waste compounds. Encodes cache-aware pacing (avoid the 300s dead zone), event-driven-over-polling, a no-change short-circuit, a compact state handle carried between ticks, and a stop condition. Use when a /loop is running or being set up — especially long-lived or frequently-firing ones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a diff for what Honey would cut — over-engineering (speculative generality, hand-rolled stdlib, single-caller abstractions) and over-verbosity (dead code, narration, redundant comments). Outputs a terse delete-list, one line per finding, with the line count each cut saves. Use when asked to review, trim, or de-bloat a change, or before opening a PR. Quality lever only — it finds waste, not correctness bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before removing code that looks redundant, wasteful, or "wrong" based on log observations or code review instinct, grep the test suite for tests whose names describe the exact behavior you're about to remove. A test whose title literally describes the "weird" thing (e.g. "calls play() even when player reports playing", "retries even when first call succeeded", "skips cache even when fresh") is a load-bearing workaround, and the production log you're reacting to is probably the workaround working as designed — not a bug. Use when: (1) Tempted to remove a function call that "looks redundant" based on a production log, (2) About to "simplify" a conditional that seems to always take the same branch, (3) Reviewing code and thinking "why would anyone write this?", (4) A log line shows a state that seems impossible or contradictory (e.g. playing=true but positionMs=0 for seconds), (5) CI surfaces a failing test whose name describes exactly what your fix removed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor changed code to reduce duplication, complexity, and wasted work. Use for diffs, commit ranges, PRs, paths, staged changes, or working-tree changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The systematic discipline of reviewing AI-generated and human-written marketing content for quality, accuracy, consistency, and effectiveness. This isn't proofreading—it's strategic quality control that catches issues before they damage brand, waste spend, or miss opportunities. In an era where AI can generate content at scale, QA becomes the bottleneck— and the moat. Speed without quality is just fast failure. Every piece of content is a brand promise, and QA ensures that promise is kept. Content QA operates at multiple levels: tactical (spelling, grammar), strategic (message alignment), technical (platform compliance), and brand (voice, tone). The best QA catches what the creator couldn't see because they were too close. Use when "review content, QA, quality check, proofread, check copy, content review, brand compliance, verify content, fact check, review before publish, content approval, final review, qa, content-review, quality-assurance, brand-compliance, proofreading, content-quality, review" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds orphaned, idle, and underutilized cloud resources across AWS, GCP, or Azure accounts. Use when someone needs to audit cloud spending, find unused EBS volumes, stale snapshots, unattached IPs, idle load balancers, or oversized RDS instances. Trigger words: cloud waste, orphaned resources, unused volumes, cloud audit, infrastructure cleanup, cloud bill analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever you need to reason like John D. Rockefeller, founder of Standard Oil and American oil industrialist. Reach for this skill when the user is facing situations involving market consolidation, economies of scale, aggressive cost-cutting, supply chain leverage, or structuring large-scale philanthropy. It is highly applicable for questions about eliminating operational waste, dealing with fierce competition, negotiating from a position of immense scale, or building self-sustaining charitable foundations. Trigger this skill for topics like monopolies, ruthless efficiency, corporate PR crises, and strategic acquisitions, even if the user doesn't explicitly name Rockefeller.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever reasoning about manufacturing, scaling production, pricing strategies, operational efficiency, vertical integration, or labor compensation. Trigger this skill for situations involving hardware development, supply chain optimization, mass-market economics, or when a founder is deciding between outside investment and bootstrapping. Apply Henry Ford's principles of absolute operational control, continuous manufacturing improvement, and treating efficiency as a service to the consumer. Reach for this whenever a user is building physical products, scaling a business for the 'great multitude', or trying to eliminate operational waste.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show whether each skill is earning its context-window cost — combined tokens-used view sorted by waste. Use when the user asks 'are my skills worth it', 'what's my context budget', 'which skills are dead weight', or wants to audit skill value, token cost, or usage. Trigger with '/janitor-value'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a warehouse for stale, unused, or redundant tables via the analyze_storage_costs MCP tool. Classifies waste patterns and table categories, computes safety tiers, and handles category drill-downs and lineage follow-ups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spending analysis and custom budget builder. Analyzes spending patterns using 50/30/20 rule, zero-based budgeting, or envelope method. Categorizes expenses, identifies waste, suggests cuts, and produces a 12-month budget. Use when the user says "/finance budget", "build me a budget", "analyze my spending", "where is my money going", or asks about expense optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit existing infrastructure for security issues, waste, and misconfigurations. Use when asked to "audit my infra", "check cloud setup", "infra review", "are we wasting money", "security check on infra", or "review my terraform".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize existing CLAUDE.md, SKILL.md, agent definitions, and other AI-facing files for Claude comprehension and economy. Scope: optimization of existing content only — not upstream sync, not read-only auditing. Measures baseline metrics, delegates to the ai-doc-optimizer agent with file-type-specific context, runs independent verification via second agent, measures post-optimization metrics, and presents comprehensive before/after report. Supports iterative mode for large targets. Use when improving prompt effectiveness, reducing token waste, or rewriting instructions for LLM consumption. Invoke with /optimize-claude-md <file-or-directory>.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run CodeBurn locally or as an MCP server so agents can inspect token usage, cost, model mix, project spend, and budget waste across coding tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。