980 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan against the project's language and documented decisions. Run BEFORE /build on non-trivial features in repos that have (or should have) a CONTEXT.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
系统架构师（阿奇 Archi）——专注于系统设计、架构决策记录（ADR）、API 设计和技术选型的权衡分析。从需求收集到深入设计，提供完整架构方案。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a CONTEXT.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for significant technical choices—frameworks, data stores, API shapes, ML platform decisions. Use when documenting a decision, onboarding, or superseding a prior approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following the Michael Nygard format. Captures context, options considered, decision rationale, and consequences. Use when making technology choices, framework selections, or any architectural decision that future developers need to understand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is story X ready to implement'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When a GDD is revised, scans all ADRs and the traceability index to identify which architectural decisions are now potentially stale. Produces a change impact report and guides the user through resolution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided, section-by-section authoring of the master architecture document for the game. Reads all GDDs, the systems index, existing ADRs, and the engine reference library to produce a complete architecture blueprint before any code is written. Engine-version-aware: flags knowledge gaps and validates decisions against the pinned engine version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read a story file and implement it. Loads the full context (story, GDD requirement, ADR guidelines, control manifest), routes to the right programmer agent for the system and engine, implements the code and test, and confirms each acceptance criterion. The core implementation skill — run after /story-readiness, before /code-review and /story-done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate approved GDDs + architecture into epics — one epic per architectural module. Defines scope, governing ADRs, engine risk, and untraced requirements. Does NOT break into stories — run /create-stories [epic-slug] after each epic is created.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用于根据 package.json、lockfile、配置、env 示例、路由、API client 或 server routes、schema、组件、测试、CI、构建/部署配置、ADR、changelog 或迁移说明等事实源同步前端项目文档。不要用于单纯润色普通文案；中文触发词包括 文档同步、更新 README、docs sync、环境变量文档、命令清单、API 文档同步。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when synchronizing frontend project documentation with source-of-truth files such as package.json, lockfiles, config, env examples, routes, API clients or server routes, schemas, components, tests, CI, build/deploy config, ADRs, changelogs, or migration notes. Do not use for general prose polishing only; Chinese triggers include document synchronization, update README, docs sync, environment variable documentation, command list, API Document synchronization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a dental hygienist — full-mouth periodontal charting and staging, sequencing scaling and root planing across quadrants, deciding whether a finding needs escalation back to the dentist, or building a home-care compliance plan for a patient with active periodontal disease.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract knowledge, guidelines, and ADRs from one or more completed spec directories into the project documentation system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write documentation developers actually use: READMEs, API docs, ADRs, runbooks, and docs-as-code workflows. Use when writing or improving technical documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage Architecture Decision Records using the Michael Nygard format. Triggers: you need to document architecture decisions, record technical choices, explain why a technology was chosen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit your project's documentation health and identify gaps. Scans for README, changelog, API docs, ADRs, runbooks, onboarding guides, and diagrams. Triggers: you need a documentation audit, want to check doc coverage, find missing documentation, or assess documentation quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a monthly content calendar across channels using the Content Marketing Matrix (Dave Chaffey, Smart Insights) - Entertain/Inspire/Educate/Convince. Every post gets a quadrant label. The monthly calendar must hit 40% Educate, 40% Inspire+Convince, 20% Entertain. Produces a week-by-week posting schedule with topics, formats, channels, and asset links. Use when the user says "content calendar", "social calendar", "plan next month's content", "what should we post", "content plan", "editorial calendar", "schedule posts for the month", or wants a structured posting plan for LinkedIn, Twitter, email, or blog. Reads brand voice, ICP, and past learnings from knowledge/. For writing the individual posts, see linkedin-post, newsletter-writer or content-writer. For the campaign this sits inside, see campaign-brief. For the end-of-month review, see retro.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate diagrams of any kind from a description, ticket, spec, or file. Outputs Mermaid syntax (renders natively in GitHub, Notion, Confluence, Obsidian, Slack with apps) plus an optional single-file HTML preview that renders the diagram in the browser. Use this skill when the user says: - "draw a flowchart", "create a diagram", "visualize this flow" - "sequence diagram", "state diagram", "ER diagram", "class diagram" - "user journey", "mindmap", "timeline", "gantt", "org chart" - "sankey", "quadrant chart", "git graph" - or pastes a ticket / spec / description and asks for a visual Picks the right Mermaid diagram type for the input, asks if ambiguous, then emits clean syntax + an optional preview file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。