「arm」の検索結果

Designing lead magnets that earn the email. The discipline of building gated content (ebooks, templates, checklists, swipe files, mini-courses, free tools) that delivers genuine standalone value while qualifying the lead and warming them for what comes next. Honest about thin-bait (overpromises, underdelivers), kitchen-sink-resource (everything, helps with nothing), and earned-value-magnet (delivers standalone value while qualifying the lead). Triggers on lead magnet, gated content, opt-in offer, ebook, checklist, template, swipe file, mini-course, free tool, content upgrade, freebie, opt-in, list-building offer. Also triggers when an audience is being asked for an email and the offer attached to that ask needs design discipline, when previous lead magnets converted but did not produce qualified leads, or when a lead magnet is being scoped for the first time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query CPIC pharmacogenomics clinical annotations database

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when coordinating multiple AI agents with Agent Relay's workflow engine and need to pick the right orchestration pattern - covers the 10 core patterns (fan-out, pipeline, hub-spoke, consensus, mesh, handoff, cascade, dag, debate, hierarchical) plus 14 specialized ones, with decision framework and accurate SDK/YAML examples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to test their LLM/agent application for safety and security vulnerabilities — jailbreaks, prompt injection, PII extraction, harmful content generation, or evaluator gaming. Also use when the user mentions security testing, adversarial testing, red teaming, safety evaluation, ASR (Attack Success Rate), or "is my app safe to deploy." Outputs ASR paired with over-refusal rate and an audit document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (NIST AI 100-1 + the NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile) to a specific AI system, governance question, or impact assessment. Three modes — consult, governance plan, full assessment — all cite Subcategories (`GOVERN 1.1`) and Profile Action IDs (`GV-1.2-001`) verbatim. Use when the user mentions the AI RMF, NIST RMF, NIST AI 100-1, NIST AI 600-1, GenAI Profile, the four functions (Govern / Map / Measure / Manage), the trustworthy AI characteristics, the 12 GAI risks (confabulation, harmful bias, information integrity, CBRN, data privacy, etc.), or asks "what does NIST say about X" for an AI system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

La compétence Normalisation juridique FR nettoie un document Word rédigé en français juridique. Elle distingue deux régimes : les corrections déterministes (apostrophes courbes, guillemets français, espaces insécables, insécables des références — art. 1240, n° 21-12.345, 50 % —, ordinaux 1ère → 1re, ligatures œ, la loi dispose et non stipule, anglicismes-calques), appliquées directement ; et les réécritures de jugement (virgule avant « et », ternaires creux, formules emphatiques, harmonisations), posées en révisions Word soumises à votre acceptation. Chaque changement est consigné et restitué en tableau récapitulatif : on revient en arrière mot à mot — « défais 3, 7-10 ». La normalisation des citations reste purement formelle. Fonctionne en Cowork ou sur fichier Word.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act Knowledge Engine — authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents (including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification — general principles, Annex I, Annex III). Answers any question about the AI Act with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, incident templates, and sector-specific guidance. This skill should be used when the user asks about the "EU AI Act", "AI Act regulation", "Regulation 2024/1689", "KI-Verordnung", asks to "explain an AI Act article", "what does Article X say", "AI Act requirements", "AI Act penalties", "AI Act timeline", "GPAI obligations", "high-risk AI", "prohibited AI practices", "AI Act and GDPR", "fundamental rights impact assessment", "AI Act standards", "AI Act national implementation", "AI literacy", "serious incident reporting", "Digital Omnibus", "AI regulatory sandbox", or any question about EU artificial intelligence regulation. Also triggers on German terms: "KI-Gesetz", "KI-Verordnung", "Hochrisiko-KI", "KI-Kompetenz", "Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung", "GPAI-Verhaltenskodex". For assessment workflows that produce a classification decision rather than a knowledge answer, offer to run a structured risk-tier classification in-session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Soft drifting gradient blobs — a warm ambient glow. A bold, canvas-based effect from Open Design's html-ppt fx pack — for slides and launch videos. Guards prefers-reduced-motion (does not start). One per screen; on web use sparingly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a restorative practice protocol for addressing harm, rebuilding trust, and restoring relationships. Use when managing conflict, behavioural incidents, or relationship breakdown between students.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing or recalibrating game balance: build a source-driven Monte Carlo balance lab (Rust + rayon) that extracts live game data, simulates human playstyles (AFK→pro), emits win-rate/economy verdicts with confidence intervals, and bruteforce-tunes parameters. Trigger on unfair levels, unreachable shops, farm exploits, interest-curve cliffs, post-content recalibration, or CI balance JSON diffs. Keywords: balance lab, Monte Carlo, win rate, difficulty curve, economy career, playstyle simulation, Resource extraction, GDScript parser, bruteforce tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert patterns for 2D/3D camera control including smooth following (lerp, position_smoothing), camera shake (trauma system), screen shake with frequency parameters, deadzone/drag for platformers, look-ahead prediction, and camera transitions. Use for player cameras, cinematic sequences, or multi-camera systems. Trigger keywords: Camera2D, Camera3D, SpringArm3D, position_smoothing, camera_shake, trauma_system, look_ahead, drag_margin, camera_limits, camera_transition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing or recalibrating game balance: build a source-driven Monte Carlo balance lab (Rust + rayon) that extracts live game data, simulates human playstyles (AFK→pro), emits win-rate/economy verdicts with confidence intervals, and bruteforce-tunes parameters. Trigger on unfair levels, unreachable shops, farm exploits, interest-curve cliffs, post-content recalibration, or CI balance JSON diffs. Keywords: balance lab, Monte Carlo, win rate, difficulty curve, economy career, playstyle simulation, Resource extraction, GDScript parser, bruteforce tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert patterns for 2D/3D camera control including smooth following (lerp, position_smoothing), camera shake (trauma system), screen shake with frequency parameters, deadzone/drag for platformers, look-ahead prediction, and camera transitions. Use for player cameras, cinematic sequences, or multi-camera systems. Trigger keywords: Camera2D, Camera3D, SpringArm3D, position_smoothing, camera_shake, trauma_system, look_ahead, drag_margin, camera_limits, camera_transition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive performance analysis, bottleneck detection, and optimization recommendations for Claude Flow swarms

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-repository coordination, synchronization, and architecture management with AI swarm orchestration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

15-agent hierarchical mesh coordination for v3 implementation. Orchestrates parallel execution across security, core, and integration domains following 10 ADRs with 14-week timeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SwiftUI framework skills — data flow (identity, Observation, state ownership), layout & containers (Layout protocol, lazy-stack performance), AlarmKit, 3D charts, rich text editing, customizable toolbars, and WebKit embedding. Use for SwiftUI state/rendering bugs, custom layouts, scroll performance, or these feature areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An implementation, which takes input data and makes it available for proper batch effect removal by ComBat or Limma. The implementation appropriately handles missing values by dissecting the input matrix into smaller matrices with sufficient data to feed the ComBat or limma algorithm. The adjusted data is returned to the user as a rebuild matrix. The implementation is meant to make as much data available as possible with minimal data loss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harmonize data management of multiple experimental assays performed on an overlapping set of specimens. It provides a familiar Bioconductor user experience by extending concepts from SummarizedExperiment, supporting an open-ended mix of st

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) is a database used for the spontaneous reporting of adverse events and medication errors related to human drugs and therapeutic biological products. faers pacakge serves as the interface between the FAERS database and R. Furthermore, faers pacakge offers a standardized approach for performing pharmacovigilance analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Graph objects from pathway topology derived from KEGG, Panther, PathBank, PharmGKB, Reactome SMPDB and WikiPathways databases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure Resource Manager development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when authoring Bicep/ARM templates, using CLI/SDK/REST, deploying stacks/registries, or securing with Key Vault/RBAC, and other Azure Resource Manager related development tasks. Not for Azure Policy (use azure-policy), Azure Resource Graph (use azure-resource-graph), Azure Portal (use azure-portal), Azure Role-based access control (use azure-rbac).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure Role-based access control development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, limits & quotas, security, configuration, and integrations & coding patterns. Use when defining custom/built-in roles, ABAC conditions, deny assignments, PIM, or ARM/Bicep-based role automation, and other Azure Role-based access control related development tasks. Not for Azure Policy (use azure-policy), Azure Security (use azure-security), Azure Resource Manager (use azure-resource-manager), Azure Portal (use azure-portal).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。