「assessment」の検索結果

60-Second Stock Snapshot — fast assessment with signal, key factors, and levels without launching subagents

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investment Thesis Generator — builds a complete, structured investment thesis with bull/bear cases, catalyst timeline, entry/exit strategies, position sizing, and asymmetry assessment for any publicly traded stock.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a GitHub issue and produce a structured implementation plan. Fetches issue details, explores the codebase, identifies affected layers (UI, BLoC, Repository, Client), and outputs a step-by-step plan with files to modify, testing strategy, and risk assessment. Works for bugs, features, and tasks. Invoke with /plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI creative director with recursive self-assessment. Generates concepts using world-class methodologies (SIT, TRIZ, Lateral Thinking, bisociation), scores against 6 weighted criteria with Cannes/D&AD/HumanKind calibration, and recursively refines until the 9+ threshold is reached. Accepts briefs in any format — text, voice transcript, PDF, or raw notes. Use when the user asks to generate creative concepts, brainstorm campaign ideas, develop a Big Idea or campaign platform, evaluate or critique existing creative work, find consumer insights, or shares a brief for ideation — including activations, PR-stunts, brand utility, experiential, and non-advertising ideas. Calibrates against a library of 569 legendary campaigns (P01-P18 pattern map) to detect saturation and ensure originality. Do not use for media planning, production budgeting, brand identity/logo design, copywriting final drafts, or market research data collection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze source code statically to detect potential functional bugs including null dereferences, incorrect condition checks, unreachable code, inconsistent state updates, logic errors, resource leaks, and type mismatches. Report suspicious code locations with detailed explanations, severity levels, and confidence assessments. Use when reviewing code for bugs, performing code audits, or when the user asks to find bugs, detect issues, analyze code for problems, or perform static analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies and analyzes conflicts in software requirements including logical contradictions, technical incompatibilities, resource constraints, timeline issues, data conflicts, and stakeholder priority mismatches. Use when reviewing requirement sets, specifications, user stories, or project plans to detect conflicts that could block implementation or cause rework. Provides detailed conflict analysis with resolution strategies and impact assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate vendors with comparison matrices, TCO analysis, risk assessment, reference check templates, and negotiation strategies

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build business cases with cost-benefit analysis, ROI calculations, risk assessment, implementation timeline, and stakeholder analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TRIGGER THIS when conducting performance reviews, writing manager feedback, creating self-assessments, building peer feedback, developing PIPs, creating development plans, or handling difficult performance conversations. Helps write constructive, specific, actionable feedback that develops performance and documents performance management appropriately.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO optimization with keyword analysis, readability assessment, technical validation, content quality. Use for search rankings, blog posts, content audits, or encountering keyword density, readability scores, meta tags, schema markup errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for security vulnerabilities. Use when the user says 'security review', 'security audit', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'pentest the code', 'OWASP check', or any variation of wanting a security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break down full ARR (ACL Rolling Review) reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains ARR reviewer fields (Paper Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Comments/Suggestions) and numeric scores (Confidence, Soundness, Excitement, Overall Assessment, Reproducibility). Splits weaknesses and comments/suggestions into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The order of operations for an Active Directory penetration test: setup, collection, exploitation, post-processing. Use this whenever you are planning or driving an AD assessment and need to know what to run before what and why (map before you exploit; harvest easy credentials before spraying to avoid lockouts; collect the graph before you reason about paths). Covers phase sequencing with standard tooling: netexec/nxc, impacket, certipy, bloodyAD, kerbrute, BloodHound CE. Invoke it at the start of an engagement, when deciding the next phase, or when a step feels out of order.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a preliminary, evidence-based EU AI Act readiness assessment across AI-system inventory, territorial scope, operator roles, prohibited-practice screening, risk classification, transparency, high-risk controls, general-purpose AI obligations, governance, and implementation milestones. Use when an organization needs to triage an AI use case, vendor, model, product, or portfolio for Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; prepare an AI inventory, gap register, implementation roadmap, or counsel briefing; assess provider, deployer, importer, distributor, product-manufacturer, authorised-representative, or GPAI-provider responsibilities; or re-check readiness after regulatory or product changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build evidence-oriented readiness checklists for frameworks such as SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR, with gaps and remediation priorities. Use when the user needs an internal readiness assessment or control-mapping plan; do not use it to certify compliance or replace an auditor or counsel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, execute, document, and retest authorized security assessments of AI agents and multi-agent workflows using safe adversarial cases, synthetic identities, canaries, and evidence-based findings. Use when defining red-team rules of engagement, assessing prompt injection or excessive agency, testing tool and identity boundaries, evaluating memory or cross-agent attacks, scoring a campaign, or verifying remediation in an approved environment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aggregate a retort run's findings.jsonl into a machine-readable assessment.json summary with severity counts, penalty score, requirement coverage, and top findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Ichthyologist. Use when a task calls for Ichthyologist judgment. Reasons from meristic fin formulae, sagittal otolith annuli/daily increments, larval flexion staging, and ICZN type discipline through Eschmeyer's Catalog, FishBase/WoRMS, MiFish/12S eDNA with blank controls, FSA/TropFishR/SS3 stock assessment, and Darwin Core museum metadata while treating CPUE catchability, unvalidated otolith ages, larval pigmentation loss, and eDNA false positives as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Immunotherapy Scientist. Use when a task calls for Immunotherapy Scientist judgment. Reasons from antigen recognition and checkpoint circuits through CAR-T/bispecific design, ASTCT CRS/ICANS grading, flow cytometry release CQAs, iRECIST response assessment, COMPASS/TIDE biomarker modeling, and JACIE/FACT IEC accreditation while treating antigen escape, pseudoprogression, tonic signaling, and step-up CRS as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Genome Engineering (CRISPR) Scientist. Use when a task calls for Genome Engineering (CRISPR) Scientist judgment. Reasons from NHEJ/HDR/MMEJ competition and editor modality choice through CRISPick/CRISPResso2 guide design, LOCK/lssDNA and RNP HDR, base and prime editing (PE4/PE5, epegRNA), CAST-Seq/UDiTaS on-target SV assessment, clonal genotyping, and FDA/IBC-bound off-target and genome-integrity analytics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Environmental Health Scientist. Use when a task calls for Environmental Health Scientist judgment. Reasons from source–pathway–receptor chains, classical vs Berkson exposure error, and tiered biomonitoring (NHANES/BEs); runs STROBE-grade epi, IRIS/OEHHA/ATSDR risk assessment, AERMOD/CALPUFF, EPHT/EJSCREEN, and HIA while treating surrogate misclassification, mobility bias, and detection≠harm as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Fisheries Scientist. Use when a task calls for Fisheries Scientist judgment. Reasons from recruitment, growth, and natural and fishing mortality through state-space assessment models (SS3, SAM, JABBA), CPUE/GLM standardization, and reference points like F_MSY and B_lim under ICES and Magnuson-Stevens frameworks, while treating hyperstability, retrospective bias (Mohn's rho), unaccounted discard mortality, and misspecified M or selectivity as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Developmental Psychologist. Use when a task calls for Developmental Psychologist judgment. Reasons from developmental trajectories, measurement invariance, and familial-environmental context through age-normed instruments (Bayley, WPPSI/WISC, CBCL, MacArthur-Bates CDI), false-belief and violation-of-expectation paradigms, and lme4/lavaan growth models while treating verbal-demand confounding of theory of mind, informative attrition, adult-normed task misapplication, and parent-versus-direct-assessment divergence as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。