「ax」の検索結果

Download large datasets from NCBI efficiently using EPost, history server, batching, rate limiting, and retry logic. Use when bulk-fetching tens of thousands of sequences, pulling all results of a large ESearch, designing reproducible pipelines, comparing E-utilities to NCBI Datasets v2 CLI, or implementing checksum-validated downloads. Encodes WebEnv TTL (~8h), EPost 200-ID limit, retmax caps, parallelization design, and integrity verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shotgun metagenomics workflow with host-depletion-aware QC, taxonomic profiling, functional profiling, AMR follow-up, and reproducible community output tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Species abundance estimation using Bracken with Kraken2 output. Redistributes reads from higher taxonomic levels to species for more accurate estimates. Use when accurate species-level abundances are needed from Kraken2 classification output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow for amplicon microbiome analysis including denoising, taxonomy assignment, diversity analysis, and differential abundance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when code has gone through repeated rework and may contain redundant logic, style drift, or tangled structure. Trigger when user asks for "返工收敛", "cleanup-pass", or requests a focused cleanup pass that reduces churn without changing behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when changing REPL clear/reset/resume/surface behavior (onClearTerminal, transcriptSeq remount, Ink Static paths, Ctrl+O/Ctrl+E transitions). Enforces single-owner reset transaction and prevents black-screen/flicker/duplicate-row regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after receiving WebGPT or another LLM review on a Formax todo and before sending the todo back for another pass. Produce a concise handoff response that says what we adopted, what we reject or question, and what the reviewer should specifically re-evaluate in `docs/todolist.md`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after task analysis when a non-trivial Formax repository task needs a structured `docs/todolist.md` with [x]/[ ] items, definitions-before-UI ordering, explicit non-goals, tests, and loop-ready execution slices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing or extending /config (storage, prompt injection, request params, UI-only toggles) with tests and strict UI parity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a reusable rolling execution pattern (README + TODO-INDEX) like plans/web-reference-react-refactor, and wants to run delivery in small validated loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding or modifying generator scripts that write files; keeps generated artifacts out of docs/ and aligns script defaults with ownership paths plus CI gate updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing/debugging Ctrl+O Expanded Transcript (second view) and thinking persistence in the REPL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for all frontend and web UI tasks by default to apply a business-agnostic desktop web visual style system with medium-strength guardrails; if an existing design system is present, follow it first and use this skill only as a style harmonizer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Formax repository task is non-trivial and you should analyze goals, non-goals, boundaries, data/type/interface impact, contract impact, test strategy, and whether an xhigh subagent is actually needed before writing a todo or code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing or modifying behavior that must stay consistent across TUI and Web (mode/input/tool/replay/order). Require canonical semantics first, then TUI/Web adapters, then renderer-specific UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding or changing any Approval prompt/presenter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when changing web CSS/UI styling so requirements, state ownership, and acceptance checks are locked before edits to prevent rework churn.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test for WCAG 2.2 AA compliance with axe-core + Playwright, keyboard navigation audits, screen reader testing, ARIA pattern validation, and legal compliance mapping (ADA, EAA, Section 508). Automated tools catch 30-40% of issues — this skill covers automated and manual testing together. Use when: "accessibility," "a11y," "WCAG," "screen reader," "axe," "keyboard navigation," "ARIA," "ADA compliance." Not for: cookie-consent/GDPR compliance — use compliance-testing; pixel-diff visual regression — use visual-testing. Related: playwright-automation, compliance-testing, visual-testing, ci-cd-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symfony UX TwigComponent for reusable UI building blocks -- server-rendered components with PHP classes and Twig templates. Use when creating buttons, cards, alerts, badges, navbars, or any reusable UI element with props, blocks/slots, computed properties, or anonymous (template-only) components. Code triggers: AsTwigComponent, #[AsTwigComponent], ExposeInTemplate, PreMount, PostMount, <twig:Alert />, <twig:Button>, component(), computed properties, anonymous component, HTML syntax. Also trigger when the user asks "how to create a reusable component", "how to make a component library", "how to pass props to a component", "how to use slots/blocks in a component", "how to build a design system in Symfony", "what is the HTML syntax for components", "how to create a component without a PHP class". Do NOT trigger for components that re-render dynamically on user input (use live-component), for JS behavior (use stimulus), or for page navigation (use turbo).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Layered technical-writing standard: Diátaxis structure, Google developer style sentences, STE instruction rules, Global English syntax. Use for /technical-writing or when writing or reviewing docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive expertise in cross-chain infrastructure, including LayerZero, Wormhole, Axelar, and custom bridge implementations. Covers omnichain token standards, message passing, bridge security, and cross-chain application architecture. Use when "cross-chain, bridge, LayerZero, Wormhole, Axelar, omnichain, multi-chain, chain abstraction, cross-chain messaging, token bridge, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert 3D modeling specialist with deep knowledge of topology, UV mapping, game-ready and film-ready pipelines, DCC tool workflows (Blender, Maya, ZBrush, 3ds Max, Houdini), retopology, LOD systems, and export pipelines. This skill represents years of production experience distilled into actionable guidance. Use when "3d model, 3d modeling, mesh topology, uv unwrap, uv mapping, retopology, retopo, low poly, high poly, subdivision, subdiv, edge flow, edge loops, polygon modeling, box modeling, hard surface, organic modeling, sculpting, zbrush, blender modeling, maya modeling, 3ds max, LOD, level of detail, game ready mesh, film ready, baking normals, high to low, fbx export, gltf export, texel density, 3d, modeling, topology, uv, game-dev, vfx, blender, maya, zbrush, retopology, lod, hard-surface, organic, sculpting" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MEMO-ONLY prior-work overlap advisory: surfaces the two ADVISORY taxonomy signals neither a tool nor a model can decide from the paper alone — ADV-TRIVIAL-COMBINATION (standard A+B+C / 缝合 stapling) and ADV-DUPLICATE-PUBLICATION (repackaged / duplicate submission). The executor RETRIEVES candidate prior work (DBLP fuzzy-title + boolean · WebSearch · WebFetch) from the paper's own title + contribution spans in the evidence ledger; TWO fresh cross-model codex reviewers (one per axis) LAY OUT the overlap side-by-side against each anchored contribution claim. It NEVER rules 'trivial' or 'duplicate' (that is a human judgment) and absence of a match is NOT evidence of originality. Emits novelty-duplication-advisory.memo.md + an info-only findings mirror; carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS novelty-check, reframed from 'is MY idea novel' to 'here is the overlap a reviewer should weigh'. Triggers: "novelty advisory", "duplication check", "prior-work overlap", "is this stapling", "缝合", "查重", "重复发表", "duplicate submission".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。