4,165 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Mescle múltiplos modelos ajustados usando mergekit para combinar capacidades sem retreinar. Use ao criar modelos especializados misturando expertise específica de domínio (math + coding + chat), melhorando performance além de modelos únicos, ou experimentando rapidamente variantes de modelos. Cobre SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task Arithmetic, mesclagem linear e estratégias de deploy em produção.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reduza o tamanho de LLMs e acelere a inferência usando técnicas de pruning como Wanda e SparseGPT. Use para comprimir modelos sem retreinamento, alcançando 50% de esparsidade com perda mínima de acurácia, ou ativando inferência mais rápida em aceleradores de hardware. Cobre pruning não estruturado, pruning estruturado, esparsidade N:M, pruning por magnitude e métodos one-shot.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load this skill whenever the project supports light/dark mode, colour theme switching, high-contrast mode, or responds to prefers-color-scheme. Under no circumstances hard-code colours that break in alternative themes. Absolutely always test colour contrast in both light and dark themes, and respect user OS-level colour preferences via CSS media queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate designs and UI requirements into robust, extensible implementations. Apply when converting designs to code, implementing components, fixing broken UI, or handling responsive layouts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate and implement Sinclair ZX80 video emulation in the EMULATORS repository, including CPU-driven display generation, display-file execution, Z80 M1/refresh/HALT/INT interactions, character and inverse-video fetches, line counter and shift register behavior, horizontal and vertical sync, collapsed display files, PAL timing, flicker, and cassette/video coupling. Use when Codex reviews or edits namespace ZX81 code for the /mZX80 model, especially ULA, ULARegisters, MemoryVideoCode, Memory, PortManager, Screen, CPU interrupt timing, raster, or video tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
プロンプト要望を対話でヒアリングして prompt-brief.json を生成するとき、target_skill と responsibility_id の確定または skill 非紐付け (standalone) の汎用プロンプト要望を構造化するときに使う。
Advogado especialista em todas as areas do Direito brasileiro: familia, criminal, trabalhista, tributario, consumidor, imobiliario, empresarial, civil e constitucional.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect NTLM relay attacks through Windows Security Event correlation by analyzing Event 4624 LogonType 3 for IP-to-hostname mismatches, identifying Responder/LLMNR poisoning artifacts, auditing SMB and LDAP signing enforcement across the domain, and detecting NTLM downgrade attacks from NTLMv2 to NTLMv1 using event log analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploys and configures CrowdStrike Falcon EDR agents across enterprise endpoints to enable real-time threat detection, behavioral analysis, and automated response. Use when onboarding endpoints to EDR coverage, configuring detection policies, or integrating Falcon telemetry with SIEM platforms. Activates for requests involving CrowdStrike deployment, Falcon sensor installation, EDR policy configuration, or endpoint detection and response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate AWS GuardDuty threat detection findings processing using EventBridge and Lambda to enable real-time incident response, automatic quarantine of compromised resources, and security notification workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes containment strategies to stop active adversary operations and prevent lateral movement during a confirmed security breach. Implements short-term and long-term containment using network segmentation, endpoint isolation, credential revocation, and access control modifications. Activates for requests involving breach containment, lateral movement prevention, network isolation, active threat containment, or live incident response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate structured post-incident reviews to identify root causes, document what worked and failed, and produce actionable recommendations to improve future incident response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill outlines methodologies for performing authorized penetration testing against AWS, Azure, and GCP cloud environments. It covers understanding the shared responsibility model for testing scope, leveraging cloud-specific attack tools like Pacu and ScoutSuite, exploiting IAM misconfigurations, testing for SSRF to cloud metadata services, and reporting findings aligned to MITRE ATT&CK Cloud matrix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs Linux memory acquisition using LiME (Linux Memory Extractor) kernel module and analysis with Volatility 3 framework. Extracts process lists, network connections, bash history, loaded kernel modules, and injected code from Linux memory images. Use when performing incident response on compromised Linux systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ADHD-friendly output shaping for subagent responses. Lead with the next action, number multi-step tasks, end with one concrete next step, suppress tangents, restate state across turns, give specific time estimates, make wins visible, matter-of-fact errors, cap visible lists to 5, no preamble or closers. Loaded by genin, jonin, anbu, tokubetsu-jonin, and chunin when shaping final responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor a class toward the Single Responsibility Principle by identifying responsibilities, grouping cohesive behavior, and extracting focused classes. Use when the user says `/srp`, asks for SRP refactoring, or runs `/refactor:srp`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatic code splitting (autoCodeSplitting), .lazy.tsx convention, createLazyFileRoute, createLazyRoute, lazyRouteComponent, getRouteApi for typed hooks in split files, codeSplitGroupings per-route override, splitBehavior programmatic config, critical vs non-critical properties.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor PR review comments and automatically classify and address reviewer feedback including code changes, questions, and nits. Use when handling PR reviews, addressing reviewer comments, responding to code review feedback, or automating review resolution. Triggers on handle reviews, PR review, address feedback, reviewer comments, code review, review response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 (Incident Response Recommendations for Cybersecurity Risk Management). Use for CSF 2.0-aligned incident response life cycles, IR roles, Community Profile priorities for DE/RS/RC and preparation, playbooks, coordination, and continuous improvement. Covers 800-61r3 only; does not replace CSF 2.0 full text, SP 800-61r2 tactical playbooks, or sector-specific breach-notification law.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0. Use for cybersecurity risk management, GOVERN, IDENTIFY, PROTECT, DETECT, RESPOND, RECOVER, Organizational Profiles, CSF Tiers, supply chain risk, enterprise risk management, incident response. Covers the CSF 2.0 document only; does not cover specific SP 800-53 controls, NIST RMF system authorization steps, or sector-specific regulations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ordnet Büroaufgaben, Korrespondenz und Fristen ohne Bindung an eine bestimmte Office-App.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-fills a customer's or prospect's security or third-party risk questionnaire from the organisation's own answer sources (prior questionnaires, answer library, policies), returning one row per question with a draft answer marked Reused, Adapted, Missing or Routed, its source, date, scope match and owner, plus the Missing list by owner. Never invents an answer, certification or control and never submits. Use when the user asks to "pre-fill this security questionnaire", "take a first pass at the customer's due diligence form", "answer this vendor assessment from our previous responses", "populate the third-party risk questionnaire" or "which questions can we reuse answers for". Do not use for screening a vendor's own answers, use vendor-risk-screening-brief instead; for RFP or tender answers use rfp-response-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads two or more supplier, bid or tender responses against a requirements list and returns a DRAFT comparison pack: a requirement-by-supplier matrix, gaps per supplier, clarification questions and neutral observations, for an evaluation panel. Never scores, weights, ranks or recommends a winner; the award stays with the panel. Use when the user asks to "compare these bids", "matrix the tender responses against our requirements", "collate the RFQ replies", "show me where each supplier falls short" or "draft clarification questions for the bidders". Do not use for scoring or weighting against agreed criteria, use supplier-evaluation-matrix instead, or for writing the requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and review native presenter classes in WordPress plugins without requiring better-data - converting DTOs or domain objects into REST arrays, admin table rows, JS config payloads, email variables, and public view models with allowlisted fields, context methods, redaction by default, locale/date/number formatting, no DTO mutation, and correct WordPress escaping boundaries. Use when adding FooPresenter, response mappers, admin-row arrays, wp_send_json payloads, rest_ensure_response data, wp_add_inline_script config, or when code returns raw DTOs, WP_Post, WC_Order, get_object_vars, json_encode, or unescaped HTML from controllers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。