「eth」の検索結果

Schools of historical thought, methodology debates, and the philosophy of history. Covers the major historiographical traditions (Annales, Marxist, feminist, postcolonial, subaltern, world-systems), their methodological commitments, their contributions and limitations, and the enduring debates about objectivity, narrative, and the nature of historical knowledge. Use when evaluating how different historians approach the same subject, understanding why historical interpretations change over time, or assessing the theoretical framework underlying a historical argument.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Historical argumentation, evidence-based writing, and oral history methods. Covers thesis development for historical arguments, evidence selection and deployment, counterargument construction and rebuttal, historical writing conventions, and the methodology of oral history as both source and practice. Use when constructing historical arguments, writing analytical essays, conducting oral history interviews, or assessing the quality of historical writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluating the quality, provenance, and relevance of evidence that supports or undermines a claim. Covers source credibility, sampling quality, study design, levels of evidence (anecdote to meta-analysis), base rate integration, distinguishing primary from secondary sources, and calibrating belief to evidence strength. Use when the question is not whether an argument is valid but whether its premises are actually supported by the available data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spectroscopy, chromatography, titration, elemental analysis, X-ray crystallography, and mass spectrometry for chemical identification and quantitation. Covers UV-Vis and IR spectroscopy, NMR fundamentals, gas and liquid chromatography, gravimetric and volumetric analysis, diffraction methods, separation techniques, and quantitative error analysis. Use when identifying unknown substances, determining purity, measuring concentrations, or interpreting analytical data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bias detection and mitigation, fairness metrics, privacy frameworks, consent models, transparency requirements, and accountability structures for data science practice. Covers algorithmic bias sources, disparate impact testing, differential privacy, GDPR principles, model cards, datasheets for datasets, responsible AI frameworks, and the organizational governance needed to make ethics actionable. Use when auditing models for bias, designing privacy-preserving systems, establishing governance processes, or evaluating the social impact of data-driven decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deductive and inductive reasoning, formal and informal logical structure, validity, soundness, and rules of inference. Covers propositional logic, quantified reasoning, syllogisms, common inference patterns (modus ponens, modus tollens, hypothetical syllogism, disjunctive syllogism), and the distinction between deductive certainty and inductive probability. Use when the question is not whether a premise is true but whether the reasoning from premises to conclusion is logically valid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persuasion and rhetorical analysis grounded in classical and modern frameworks. Covers Aristotle's three appeals (ethos, pathos, logos), rhetorical situation (audience, purpose, context), argument structure (Toulmin model), logical fallacies, persuasive writing, propaganda analysis, and ethical persuasion. Use when constructing arguments, analyzing rhetoric, evaluating persuasive messages, detecting fallacies, or studying the relationship between language and power.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep symmetries and unifying principles — gauge theory, Lie groups, Noether's theorem, and the Standard Model. Constructs field theories from symmetry requirements, derives conservation laws, and traces force unification. Use when working with gauge symmetry, Lie groups (U(1), SU(2), SU(3)), conservation laws via Noether's theorem, the Higgs mechanism, or Standard Model structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NASA Systems Engineering methodology mapped to cloud operations. Use when planning, executing, verifying, or documenting OpenStack cloud infrastructure following NASA SP-6105 and NPR 7123.1 processes. Provides phase gate criteria, document templates, and cross-references for all 7 SE lifecycle phases applied to cloud deployment and operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants to discover, define, or refine their product's aesthetic identity. Triggers on "what should this feel like?", "help me figure out the vibe", "something feels off visually", "I want it to feel like [X]", "define the visual language", or when a project has no established design direction. This is the art director skill - it helps users articulate something they can feel but can't name. Also handles quick cohesion checks when the orchestrator needs one during cycle planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference guide for the Twelve-Factor App methodology — 15 principles (12 original + 3 modern extensions) for building portable, resilient, cloud-native applications. Use when evaluating application architecture, designing cloud-native services, reviewing codebases for methodology compliance, advising on configuration, scaling, observability, security, and deployment patterns. Incorporates the 2025 open-source community evolution and cloud-native reinterpretations of each factor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate whether an implementation plan can achieve its stated outcome before execution. Use to check requirement coverage, task contracts, dependencies, data/artifact flow, testability, ownership, impact coverage, and executable ordering without checking whether implementation already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and diagnoses list experiments (the item count technique), covering whether indirect measurement is warranted, control-list construction against floor and ceiling effects, design variants, estimators and assumption tests in the list package, and power planning for the precision penalty. Use when the user measures a sensitive attitude or behavior and asks about list experiments, item count, unmatched count, or veiled questioning, or has an implausible prevalence estimate. Deciding whether sensitivity bias exists at all goes to survey-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs multi-country survey experiments, covering case selection with a stated comparative logic, instrument localization and TRAPD translation, stimulus calibration, per-country power, and pooled versus per-country analysis with measurement-equivalence checks. Use when the user fields the same experiment in several countries, asks which countries to include, how to adapt an instrument without breaking comparability, whether to pool, or how large each country sample must be. Question wording goes to survey-design, reporting to methods-reporting, the study plan to pre-registration-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a methods section against a 45-item checklist drawn from the APSA Experimental Section rubric, JARS-Quant, CONSORT, and DA-RT. Use before submission or archiving, or to document a pre-analysis-plan deviation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize DI registrations using IServiceCollection extension methods. Group related services into composable Add* methods for clean Program.cs and reusable configuration in tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track and optimize agent specialization during methodology development. Use when agent specialization emerges (generic agents show >5x performance gap), multi-experiment comparison needed, or methodology transferability analysis required. Captures agent set evolution (Aₙ tracking), meta-agent evolution (Mₙ tracking), specialization decisions (when/why to create specialized agents), and reusability assessment (universal vs domain-specific vs task-specific). Enables systematic cross-experiment learning and optimized M₀ evolution. 2-3 hours overhead per experiment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The harnesses a campaign keeps, read outside a run: which there are and where each came from, what each is made of and what moved from its parent, what each was measured to be, trying one on a task, the audit before a promotion and the blind review at a handover, whether a part earns its place, and changing what makes a harness or what a seat is told about one. Use when the operator asks which harness is current, what a Builder changed, whether a harness is ready to promote or hand over, to run a kept harness on a task, or to change the harness contract. Reading one run is whole-run-investigation's, wording a claim attribution-and-proof's.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect, triage, de-duplicate, and raise compiler bug reports when an agent encounters a likely compiler defect during implementation, review, testing, or issue work. Use when a task surfaces an ICE, panic, wrong accept/reject behavior, miscompile, lowering/emission bug, diagnostic bug, formatter/LSP/frontend drift, or other likely compiler/tooling defect; pause current work, minimize the repro, decide whether the bug blocks the task or has a valid workaround, check whether it is already reported, and then use create-github-issue to raise the bug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate whether an OSS repo is worth long-term investment before committing time. Assesses project health, governance, community, bus factor, and trajectory. Use when deciding whether to contribute to a specific repo, choosing between multiple repos, or evaluating a project's sustainability. Not for checking if a repo accepts contributions — use oss-find-issue for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when refactoring code with poor names, when asked to improve naming, or when a user struggles to name a class/method/variable. Symptoms include -Manager/-Util suffixes, single-letter variables, process/handle/do verbs, primitive obsession, god methods with multiple responsibilities. Two modes — audit (broad scan, list opportunities) and improve (walk one specific identifier through the process).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Icarus Figures produces publication-grade figures for scientific papers — reproducible matplotlib/seaborn data figures and original TikZ method/framework/architecture figures, held to a four-axis quality bar (depth · elegance · unimpeachable · visible-gap) and exported as editable PDF+PNG+SVG with a runnable critique gate. Use this whenever a figure is destined for a paper, journal, conference submission, thesis, or report — making a plot/chart publication- or journal-ready, building a method/architecture/framework diagram or 技术路线图 (the hero figure a paper opens with), a schematic or workflow figure, or cleaning up a matplotlib/seaborn/TikZ figure that currently looks like a homework plot. Trigger even when the user never says "publication": if the figure goes into a written scientific document, this skill applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What this project has already learned the hard way, and where any new such fact belongs. Two jobs. (1) Routing: this project keeps NO per-project Claude memories — read this before writing anything down, and pick a durable home from the list here. (2) An index, by area, of non-obvious facts worth knowing before you guess: debugging rigs and measurements that lie, iOS/WebKit and the tethered iPhone, the Windows app, production and deployment, and general codebase traps. Use before setting up a browser- or server-driven debugging session, when a bug reproduces only on iPhone, in Safari or in the Windows app, before changing deployment configuration or reading store/crash data, when something behaves unexpectedly and you are about to guess why, and whenever you are tempted to record a fact for later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

配置监控和告警时使用。适用于 Prometheus / Grafana / Loki / PagerDuty / SLO 定义 / 告警规则设计。融合 Google SRE 四大黄金信号 + USE Method + 告警分级。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。